SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Chuckhammer

Member Since
Dec. 25, 2018
Favourite Team
Montreal Canadiens
2nd Favourite Team
Pittsburgh Penguins
Forum Posts
13
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 2, 2019 at 5:38 p.m.
Thread: Stone Duchene to habs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BurgerBoss</b></div><div>We all know that Melnyk will consider Shaw as a bad contract because he's a tad overpaid - therefore he's negative value for Sens' point of view. Lindgren makes it neutral value. So it's Tatar, Suzuki, Juulsen and 1st...that's a potential offer for Duchene, sure, maybe OTT even needs to add something to that one... But not Stone.</div></div>

Shaw’s a pretty good depth player to have and the sens will need bodies, but I’m good with offering more, as long as we don’t touch Kotkaniemi, Domi, Drouin, Gallagher, Weber, Petry, and probably Danault. The only other prospect I wouldn’t want to let go is Poehling.

But if we can get Duchene and Stone long term, it brings us to a whole new level
Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 2, 2019 at 5:28 p.m.
Thread: Stone Duchene to habs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Liguori911</b></div><div>Seriously????

Suzuki, Juulsen and 1rst round draft pick for two player whitout contract at the end of the seasons can't be consider as a good trade for MTL.
And you add Tatar sign for 3 years and shaw sign for 4 years.

Habs will REJECT this trade and not would negotiate with you either.</div></div>

It’s conditional on signing both to extensions. I love what the habs have done, but we’re still just battling to make the playoffs, not competing with Tampa, TO, Washington, and Pittsburgh. We would be way better off with Stone &amp; Duchene for the next 7 years. If anything, I agree with the guy saying that it’s not enough value to Ottawa... but both will be UFA so they’ll have to trade them or lose them