Get CapFriendly PremiumGet CapFriendly Premium
Avatar

Civil_Eng_PE

Yegor bomb
Member Since
Apr. 11, 2022
Favourite Team
Columbus Blue Jackets
Forum Posts
766
Posts per Day
1.3
Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 15 at 10:22 a.m.
Thread: Get it done Jarmo
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>hopefullynextyear</b></div><div>I think this team needs a stabilizer in order to be playing somewhat meaningful games in March and April. They look overwhelmed often and need a high end veteran in the middle of the ice. Assuming that Lindholm will sign an extension, I think Jarmo needs to make a move like this in order to prevent the season being over in December.</div></div>

TBH the season is already over... we've won 1 game in our last 11 and officially have a worst start than what we had last year where we finished with the second worst record in the league... Yes the Blues made a miracle happen and won a cup with a similar start but CBJ don't have the mindset and mental strength to pull through this. The season is over and there is no way we trade that 1st round pick anymore. Lindholm would have to sign with us in the off season as a UFA or we do a sign and trade like we did with Severson (which is not working out cause he is playing like garbage right now) if Lindholm wants a final 8 year contract for his career.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 30 at 7:15 a.m.
Thread: If Petey forces his way out next summer
KJ, imo, is untouchable right now. Other CBJ fans think Jiricek is also untouchable but I'll allow it in this instance. A trade for Petey wanting out next summer would be around a Eichel return not Tkachuk since Calgary wanted to still compete so that trade really isn't comparable. This trade would be a mini retool and to shorten any rebuild Van would have to commit to (also similar to what Buffalo has done). With that you get the following:

- a 50 pt. a season player (23-25 years old)
- a young prospect (mid 1st round)
- mid 1st round pick
- mid 2nd round pick

Now lets say EP is worth more then Eichel was at that time (Which is true since Eichel had an unknown with his neck) so lets bump that "a young prospect (mid 1st round)" to a coveted prospect who was drafted at the top of the draft (Jiricek). Then you have Cole Silinger who is the Krebs part of this trade. Then you have the 2025 1st (which should be a mid 1st rounder) and then we add a 2nd the following year.

We get this as the final trade:

From Van:

- EP

From CBJ:

- Cole Sillinger
- Jiricek
- 2025 1st
- 2026 2nd

This is the most I can see Jarmo offering IMO. I know you, based off comments already, will hate this trade but for the sake of argument I thought I would add my 2 cents.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 9 at 10:04 a.m.
Thread: Petry
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Koskinen_The_Great</b></div><div>He cant even figure out that this ACGM is from 2024-25. Petry has a 1 year left. Its looking more and more like hes a TDL or next offseason move. The guy completely ignores that bad money is coming back with Boqvist whos a 3rd pair at best replacement level defender. Hayes is a forward, with more term and had no money come back in the deal. It's illogical nonsense from these homers to compare Petry to Hayes here.</div></div>

Apologies for not seeing the year but you don't have to be an absolute **** about it. Petry will not get anything close to the return posted here unless Boqvist has another injury filled season. If he again plays 50+ games and does well on the PP2 unit there is no way he gets moved for a player similar to Petry.

Cap is and will still be a struggle next off season. Petry gets paid too much and unless you retain 50% the return he will get is a 3rd rounder max. If you retain 50% at next seasons (2024-2025) deadline when some teams may have cap space due to LTIR and a need for a 3RD you may be able to get more for him but your value of him is currently too high.

Boqvist is not an "at best replacement defender" LMFAO
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 8 at 2:31 p.m.
Thread: Petry
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Subbanator7667</b></div><div>He would be 2.3 million and that price for a 30-40 point RHD will have value. He has a 15 no trade list, so Habs have plenty of leverage. Overall, Petry will still have value and RHD are always a needed commodity around the league</div></div>

This trade retains only 1mil not the full 50%. MAYBE at 50% retained he gets a return but even at 50% its not getting the return offered in this ACGM.

The amount of times I have seen people say "This player has value at whatever retention" and then the return is 0 with that retention this summer has been often. Taylor Hall got NOTHING, Hayes (Flyers fans were saying him at 50% retained should get them a 2nd at the least) Hayes returned a 6th LMAO. Petry will not yield any return.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 8 at 2:01 p.m.
Thread: Petry
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Subbanator7667</b></div><div>How is Petry a cap dump at 2.3 million? He's still a useful 4-5 dman and at that AAV would be making below market value according to every analytic model</div></div>

This retention puts him at 3,687,500 for 2 (TWO) years. Have you seen players being traded this summer with cap hits like this for any return? Ryan Johansen got nothing in return when going to Colorado at 50% retained at 4mil for 2 years remaining, Taylor Hall practically got moved for nothing when being traded to Chicago with 6 mil AAV for 2 more years, and Kevin Hayes got 0 return when being traded to St. Louis with 3.5mil AAV left for 3 years. The answer is absolutely not that Petry get any much of a return if he is traded again. Petry also doesn't want to be in Canada you have 0 leverage in a situation like this.