ComixZone Profile - CapFriendly

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 16 at 3:39 p.m.

Thread: Extra

That doesn't get you Tanev (especially with retention).

2nd + 5th + Stanley might do it, but Flames are after quality not quantity. If the 2nd is the key to a deal, it'll likely be a conditional 2nd that becomes a 1st with team success in the playoffs

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 2 at 1:20 a.m.

Thread: Tanev is next

That's a terrible return for Tanev.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 7 at 1:48 p.m.

Thread: Deadline Moves

Flames won't let Toronto hedge their picks that way. 1st + 5th is roughly "market value" for Tanev.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 7 at 1:47 p.m.

Thread: TDL moves

Flames say absolutely not.

Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 8, 2023 at 11:13 p.m.

Thread: goalie

Makes zero sense for Calgary.

Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 8, 2023 at 2:33 p.m.

Thread: Hanifin and Tanev

I don't think that package of 'stuff' gets you both Hanifin and Tanev, particularly at 50% retained.

Hanifin is worth at least 1st + 2nd, and may even be worth a touch more if it's with the negotiated extension (8 Years, $60M) - and Tanev is worth what Chiarot returned (Tanev is a significantly better player too), and that was a 1st + 4th.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 11, 2023 at 11:26 a.m.

Thread: Sweden Roster

This trade makes zero sense for the Flames.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 11, 2023 at 8:54 a.m.

Thread: Zadorov

Flames are (likely) after picks/prospects, not an everyday NHL'er hockey trade.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 11, 2023 at 8:38 a.m.

Thread: Zadorov Tanev Milstein special

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>westleysnipez</b></div><div>Take out Cole and Zadorov. Swap McWard for Woo and up the 4th to a 3rd. I'd do that as VAN. Which means Flames fans will want Karlsson OTT-SJS level return.</div></div>

I think the return for Tanev being a 1st round pick is fair, especially if it requires either the Flames to retain salary and/or to take back player like Beauvillier.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 11, 2023 at 8:32 a.m.

Thread: Lines with Zadorov

I don't think a 3rd and 4th + cap dump + an AHL farm hand is enough.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 11, 2023 at 8:31 a.m.

Thread: Getr Done

Both trades are brilliant for the Blues, and terrible for the other teams. Oilers and Flames say hell no.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 9, 2023 at 1:22 a.m.

Thread: Whats the price Flames fans

You probably have to give up 1st + 3rd + 3rd for Tanev and Zadorov at 50% retained, without any picks going back to Toronto. Tanev and Zadorov are near perfect targets for the Leafs, and the Flames wouldn’t be worried about taking back Klingberg.

Calgary may even be able to extract more value from those two depending on the market…but yeah, it makes a lot of sense for the Leafs. It also wouldn’t surprise me to see them target Vladar.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 7, 2023 at 10:51 p.m.

Thread: Fck them prospects lets add defense

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kinger25</b></div><div>And Minten is worth a second</div></div>

Yeah if that’s true then the Flames absolutely take that deal.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 7, 2023 at 4:51 p.m.

Thread: Fck them prospects lets add defense

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dr_Invictus</b></div><div>Calgary declines if solely for the cap issues.</div></div>

I don't think Calgary declines that.

1st + 3rd + 3rd for those two defencemen at 50% retained for the remainder of this year seems like fine value. Klingberg is on an expiring deal.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 7, 2023 at 4:49 p.m.

Thread: Pull the trigger

Calgary rejects that trade outright. Zero interest in Brodie or Klingberg.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 7, 2023 at 4:49 p.m.

Thread: Boston Bruins

Yeah, that offer for Lindy isn't enough. It's a 1st and a bunch of stuff that just isn't wanted/needed.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 7, 2023 at 4:47 p.m.

Thread: adding tanev

I don't think you need to add a 3rd.

1st round pick for Tanev (50% retained) fits the market price well enough. Flames would probably push for a 2024 1st, as you rarely see 1st rounders tossed out 3 years into the future.

Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 4, 2023 at 11:24 p.m.

Thread: A Question of Value

The deal just doesn’t address anything for Calgary.

Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 1, 2023 at 11:15 p.m.

Thread: If the rumours are true

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jfkst1</b></div><div>Convenient to ignore the two years younger and cost controlled value. Don't worry though, like most NHL players, Carlo will block a trade to Calgary.</div></div>

Two years younger, still a 2nd pairing defenceman for a 28 year old #1 centre. You can take a shot at Calgary all you want, but your evaluation of NHL talent is still horrible.

Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 31, 2023 at 5:56 p.m.

Thread: If the rumours are true

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jfkst1</b></div><div>Carlo straight up is at least as valuable as Lindholm. Younger and cheaper long term. Boston might need to trade both for cap purposes, but they wouldn't be a better team from this deal.</div></div>

Not a chance. Lindholm is worth significantly more than a 2nd pairing defenceman.

Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 8, 2023 at 3:30 p.m.

Thread: Brad Treliving MasterChef

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bg77</b></div><div>Hello ComixZone,

Thank you for the feedback!

Do you think Calgary has any genuine interest in adding William Nylander and extending him as a Flames fan, and if so what would the return be in your opinion if you guys were to sign and trade? I just look at that team and from the outside looking in, they are too good to tank and too weak upfront to lose Lindholm and Backlund for nothing, and I just thought Nylander genuinely fills that whole. If they lose those two centres plus Hanifin in free agency they are in no-man's land with some big money committed to guys like Huberdeau, Kadri, and Weegar. I completely expect some sort of re-tool. Would love to hear your opinion so I can apply it to future ideas.</div></div>

Nylander definitely scratches an itch for the Flames, but if Lindholm isn’t here then it’s a rebuild for the Flames.

I look at Toronto’s needs and wonder about a three-way:

To Toronto: Chris Tanev, Mikael Backlund (50% retained), 2024 1st round pick (PIT), 2025 3rd round pick (PIT), Owen Pickering

To Pittsburgh: Noah Hanifin

To Calgary: William Nylander (+ cap dump not named Murray if needed).

I definitely think Nylander is of interest for Calgary, just not without Lindholm. Without Lindholm, the Flames are beginning to enter tankville.

Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 8, 2023 at 12:42 p.m.

Thread: Flaming Maple Leafs

Take off Zadorov and put in Tanev. Better fit.

Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 8, 2023 at 12:41 p.m.

Thread: Brad Treliving MasterChef

Horrible trade for the Flames.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 20, 2023 at 11:23 p.m.

Thread: After the retool

Lindholm on signing an extension: “I have one year left, that’s all I’ll say”

This roster: “He’s going to sign, and he’ll do it on a hometown discount and on a non-max term deal!”

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 20, 2023 at 11:20 p.m.

Thread: Lucas Raymond to Calgary reverse

Lindholm to Detroit makes sense to me.

…not in a trade like this though. Detroit won’t and shouldn’t give up those pieces.

Could I see DET’s 2023 1st? Maaaaaybe, but not for the package proposed here.

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

ComixZone

Flames fan

Member Since

Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day