Edit Avatar
  • png, jpeg
  • Recommended minimum size 800px by 800px
  • Maximum size: 1MB
Drag image to reposition
Save
Cancel

Connor_McJesus_97

The right to Wright
Member Since
Dec 1, 2020
Favourite Team
Edmonton Oilers
2nd Favourite Team
New York Rangers
Location
Sweden
Forum Posts
285
Posts per Day
1.16
Forum Threads
73
Biography
Love me so McDraisaitl combo. Lundqvist is a beast. Edmonton should have the right to wright
Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 9:58 pm
Thread: EDM OILERS
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Pagsy8</b></div><div>didn't happen, we need a young goalie, klingberg is on the block, I updated this, lmk what u think</div></div>

Murray and Keith should get swapped. With what we gave up for Keith and with what he is earning he gotta play a top 4 role. Murray is a good signing tho. Also Pittsburgh is not doing that. They wanna win now. Send Koskinen to Buffalo for a 2nd or a another team that is bad. Also Buffalo would not really have any use of Russel. A team in a win-now mode would make more sense. Also make sure to retain on him. Kassian trade is fine. With Kuemper gone from the market plus Ullmark signed idk what to go after. Carolina just signed Andersen after aquiring Bernier so maybe there is something there you can do?
Forum: Armchair-GMWed at 6:34 pm
Thread: EDM OILERS
You forgot about Yamamoto. Doesn't matter what Hyman makes this season his aav and caphit is still 5.5 mil. Tatar will be a great signing for whoever gets him. Give him more term. 3-4 years and you've got yourself the next Toffoli contract. Shore is not getting scratched swap him with Turris who is bad and put Turris on taxi squad. Lagesson should be your 7th D and Russell you can trade him for whatever he brings you. a 5th or a 6th with some salary retained. Ekholm is worth way more I would have loved to get him for that price range but were talking a 1st plus a prospect to begin with. That is where the trade talk starts if we could get him on an extension. Even without it he would go for a 1st. Keith should get to play a top 4 role either way so we don't really need Ekholm anyways. Dumping Kassian+Koskinen would cost a 2nd for Koskinen and at least a 3rd for Kassian if not more
Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 10:18 pm
Thread: Messing with the Oilers
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>notKyleDUbas123</b></div><div>Oilers just got swept by a team that got swept. You guys just gave up assets for a 38 year old d man who was a cap dump just a few months ago, lost your best shutdown dman, and might re-sign Tyson Barrie too. Have fun paying Hyman 5.5 for 8 years.

Oh btw, McDavid is leaving</div></div>
They got swept by a team that ended up going to the Finals, Scheifele was gone for 3 games(they're not getting swept with him in) Hellebuyck wasn't as good as he was against the Oilers when he faced the Montreal Canadiens but I guess you didn't factor that in? I don't like the Smith contract but let's not get to cocky here. We saw what people said about him last year and how he proved them wrong. If he can give us good goaltending this season I take it. The last year is what it is but if he can play a backup role then with someone else being the starter you can make it work decently. Hyman shows up everygame you should know that as a Leafs fan. 8 years is alot of term but he got the spirit and he is a warrior out there. I like that. As long as we can have something happen that is good.
Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 1:28 pm
Thread: Want Tarasenko and Dougie so bad
Heard it<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>1- I DEFY you to produce ONE source saying anything resembling this.
2- Dude, he's healthy now. And played from March on with no issue.
3- You're in fantasy land.
4- Again, did you not see their picks? They went cheap, cheap, cheap, even taking some players nobody had ever heard of and expiring UFAs they have no intention of signing.</div></div>

As I said. They went conservative. But the GM can spend up to the roof if he so wishes. If they saw something in Tarasenko they are taking him no doubt. A somewhat healthy Tarasenko is a no brainer and it will attract fans. I think that no team is trading for Tarasenko as they agree with me on the price. It isn't really worth it. A 2nd plus something else. If any team thought it was worth it he would have been traded. I just don't think you should in this flatcap-era take on his 7.5m with all his surgeries. This will be his last shot. About him being recommended not to play it was in a podcast but it is not an english one. I hope to see him recover well but he hasn't been himself since the injuries.



1- Haha what?! Where did you invent that fiction from?
2- And you would be soundly rejected. Because duh.
3- Yeah, because they were able to grab Dunn, who fit with their scheme of taking on as little salary as possible. Let's not pretend that Seattle chose to make the best team.[/quote]
Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 1:04 pm
Thread: Want Tarasenko and Dougie so bad
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>I can only assume that Boqvist and a 2nd or 3rd would get it done.

If they reject my 3rd pick that is fine. Im not giving them a 2nd that will be a 33-35 pick probably. better to sign a Gusev or something instead. He could cost you 3-5m which is atleast 2.5m cheaper and you don't give up anyhing for him. Also the ownership has given the Seattle GM permission to go for it and spend up to the caproof. Im not saying they went all out this draft because they were conservative but the GM can do whatever he wants



1- Haha what?! Where did you invent that fiction from?
2- And you would be soundly rejected. Because duh.
3- Yeah, because they were able to grab Dunn, who fit with their scheme of taking on as little salary as possible. Let's not pretend that Seattle chose to make the best team.</div></div>
Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 1:02 pm
Thread: Want Tarasenko and Dougie so bad
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>I can only assume that Boqvist and a 2nd or 3rd would get it done.


He has been reccommended by doctors to not play hockey after having 3 shoulderoperations on the same shoulder. It is a big risk taking his contract on. No reason to pay more then a 3rd. Yeah Dunn is good and it made sense to pick him but Seattle will go for it immediately so if they saw something in Tarasenko they would have chosen him. Also he is a big name player that will attract fans. Could be a decent captain just like he wanted to be in St Louis.


1- Haha what?! Where did you invent that fiction from?
2- And you would be soundly rejected. Because duh.
3- Yeah, because they were able to grab Dunn, who fit with their scheme of taking on as little salary as possible. Let's not pretend that Seattle chose to make the best team.</div></div>
Forum: Armchair-GMJul 25 at 8:07