DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
19
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
DD67
Member Since
Jun. 18, 2015
Favourite Team
Pittsburgh Penguins
Forum Posts
332
Posts per Day
0.1
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 24, 2018 at 1:19 p.m.
Thread:
Transylvania Emperors
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MajesticWalrus</b></div><div>Sprong instead of rowney and you're golden</div></div>
Sprong playing 4th line minutes isn't helping his development. Rowney being available to take draws and PK gives the team options. If the one weakness at forward is #12 the team is in really good shape.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 8, 2016 at 11:08 a.m.
Thread:
Trouba
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Larkinisking</b></div><div><i>Maatta+2nd isn't bad value for Trouba, But i seriously doubt he would commit long term with Pitt. The way Dreger was talking and they way Overhardt sounded The Bruins, Rangers and Red Wings were the only teams that Trouba would commit to long term. At most Pitt would only have Trouba for 3 years not sure that he's worth Maatta for that.</i></div></div>
How much longer is the Crosby-Malkin window open though? Getting 2-3 years of Trouba matches up with it pretty well (Hornqvist is also a UFA too).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 29, 2016 at 1:50 p.m.
Thread:
Trade Deadline
Sign me up! If Honka can push his way into the lineup then you can possibly run Dumolin - Honka as the middle pair and Daley - Schultz as the new offensive zone 3rd pair.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 15, 2016 at 4:27 p.m.
Thread:
Its Simply Another
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JuniorGM</b></div><div><i>So...
Maatta- 180GP 58points at a .32 points per game
Hamilton- 276GP 132 points at a .48 points per game
If you are into advance stats Hamilton has much better ones.
Last 5 years:
Elliott- 192 games: .922sv% 2.09 GAA
Fleury- 297 games: .917sv% 2.36 GAA
Why would the flames do this? Are people that caught up in Elliott's bad start?
Also Calgary would be adding 41.73 mil total to they pay roll over these contracts while pens only add 31.25 mil. this is a god awful deal for the flames and a steal for the pens.</i></div></div>
That's all situations. Even strength it's .929 for Elliott and .926 for Fleury (2012/13 through 2015/16 so I'm not even including Elliott's poor start this year). On the PK they're still similar with Fleury at .900 sv% to Elliot's .895. Fleury has almost 60% more 4v5 TOI than Elliott to boot.
They are not drastically different from each other in terms of performance. But Fleury has established that he can be a team's #1 goalie and sustain those numbers. This is Elliott's chance to do so and he hasn't capitalized on it yet.
That total payroll figure doesn't account for the difference in term. And cost certainty has its own appeal to certain teams. Not saying the Flames are one; just that this isn't a complete negative the way you're portraying it. Also, does anyone actually think about contracts in those terms? Teams will be paying that money to somebody. Better question is does their performance merit being paid that amount.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 15, 2016 at 4:24 p.m.
Thread:
Hamilton
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JuniorGM</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>IgorKutchakokov</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JuniorGM</b></div><div><i>So pens get the better goalie and dman? Yea don't think thats a fair trade.</i></div></div>
Hahahahaha Elliott's .885 save % says otherwise. And (in this scenario) Jarry is thrown in who's probably a top-10 goalie prospect.</i></div></div>
Yup lets use a 12 game sample size instead of the last 3 years in which Elliott has had better numbers.
Last 3 seasons:
Elliot- .929
MAF- .919
11 games this year:
Elliot- .882
MAF- .910</i></div></div>
That's all situations. Even strength it's .929 for Elliott and .926 for Fleury (2012/13 through 2015/16 so I'm not even including Elliott's poor start this year). On the PK they're still similar with Fleury at .900 sv% to Elliot's .895. Fleury has almost 60% more 4v5 TOI than Elliott to boot.
They are not drastically different from each other in terms of performance. But Fleury has established that he can be a team's #1 goalie and sustain those numbers. This is Elliott's chance to do so and he hasn't capitalized on it yet.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 15, 2016 at 4:14 p.m.
Thread:
Hamilton
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>IgorKutchakokov</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JuniorGM</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>IgorKutchakokov</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JuniorGM</b></div><div><i>So pens get the better goalie and dman? Yea don't think thats a fair trade.</i></div></div>
Hahahahaha Elliott's .885 save % says otherwise. And (in this scenario) Jarry is thrown in who's probably a top-10 goalie prospect.</i></div></div>
Yup lets use a 12 game sample size instead of the last 3 years in which Elliott has had better numbers.
Last 3 seasons:
Elliot- .929
MAF- .919
11 games this year:
Elliot- .882
MAF- .910</i></div></div>
And the fact Jarry is thrown in?? No value to that?</i></div></div>
In all honesty swapping the G prospects is more about keeping the two clubs' pipelines flowing. The Flames need a prospect who'll be ready sooner rather than later. Jarry's trajectory has always been to take over for Flower. No reason to change that now. The Penguins don't need another young stud goalie for the foreseeable future. So they'll take the younger guy from Calgary who'd otherwise clog up their AHL net (which now belongs to Jarry).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 15, 2016 at 4:08 p.m.
Thread:
Doug
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Blynasty</b></div><div><i>This would be the only scenario that would make sense to me. I don't think the Penguins are looking to move Maatta just for another RHD. Flames get a goalie to build around (Elliot wasn't that guy) and a veteran defenseman that can play pretty much anywhere with anyone. Pouliot is there as a cheap player who shows promise and needs a shot, which the Penguins aren't really built to allow for. I think this trade makes much more sense for both sides than the Maatta trades being thrown around on here.</i></div></div>
That veteran Defenseman is a pending UFA. And on the PIT side, they now have 4 defenseman in need of protection from the Expansion Draft (Letang, Maatta, Hamilton, and Dumolin). Which means now instead of protecting 7F/3D they're limited to 8 skaters. With 4 being defenseman, that means they're protecting Crosby, Malkin, Kessel, and Hornqvist. A barren collection of LWs is going to be even thinner next year if/when Vegas takes Hagelin.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 15, 2016 at 9:37 a.m.
Thread:
Possible Calgary 2017-2018
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>npalley98</b></div><div><i>Pens would love this trade but after putting it in on my own they would have a real log jam at center. Plus pens need defense above anything else.</i></div></div>
In 2017-18 they don't. Cullen likely retires. Will they resign Bonino to a big payday? If not that's both bottom 6 centers needing replacement. And the internal pool of candidates is Sundqvist, Fehr, and maybe Guentzel.
I think this is a big overpayment for Fleury. A roster player, a good prospect, salary relief, and a 1st? Pens would be happy with a mid-round pick with all those other pieces still in place.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 14, 2016 at 5:14 p.m.
Thread:
Hamilton
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sqm918</b></div><div><i>Bad deal for pens</i></div></div>
Getting the relief from MAF in and of itself makes the deal worth it. Upgrading the defense is the cherry on top.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 14, 2016 at 5:13 p.m.
Thread:
Hamilton
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JuniorGM</b></div><div><i>So pens get the better goalie and dman? Yea don't think thats a fair trade.</i></div></div>
Elliott's not really working out. Better or worse MAF is consistently league average. I think both D Men would be better off in the new team's system rather than their current ones.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 31, 2016 at 12:33 p.m.
Thread:
Fleury Trade
Problem is OTT has an internal budget. No way they eat dead money on Anderson for 2 years. More likely it's the Pens that retain salary on Fleury to make the salary output the same for OTT.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 27, 2016 at 4:34 p.m.
Thread:
I'm sick of the Trouba trades, but here is one.
That's interesting. I'd rather have Connor than Lemieux but I doubt WPG is giving him up. Don't the Pens risk losing Hellebuyck to Vegas just like Murray?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 30, 2016 at 1:59 p.m.
Thread:
Pens interested in Trouba?
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div><i>Actually a fair hockey deal....just wondering if the Jets would be that interested in Fleury, and now with Murray's injury how anxious the Pens would be to trade to trade Fleury.</i></div></div>
Also would Fleury waive his NTC if WPG is on his list? Kind of doubt it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 30, 2016 at 10:34 a.m.
Thread:
Kucherov Resigned + Bishop trade
Why on Earth would Dallas make that trade? They already have too much money tied up in frequently injured goalies. And giving up Honka is insane. They don't need a Vezina caliber (when healthy) player. If they can dump salary and get league average goaltending they'd be in a much better place. And they'd still have one of their best remaining prospects in house.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 29, 2016 at 8:58 a.m.
Thread:
Kucherov pack your stuff
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LeafsFan</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DD67</b></div><div><i>Adjusted Kucherov's contract to $6.258 per year to keep it within the proper compensation band.</i></div></div>
At that point TB matches</i></div></div>
They only have $5.5m in space right now. How do they get enough to match?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 28, 2016 at 5:09 p.m.
Thread:
Kucherov pack your stuff
Adjusted Kucherov's contract to $6.258 per year to keep it within the proper compensation band.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 28, 2016 at 5:06 p.m.
Thread:
Kucherov pack your stuff
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>aktune</b></div><div><i>If this is an offer sheet compensation model, I think you owe an extra 1st rounder to make it 2 1sts, a 2nd and a 3rd. You have to take the total contract amount and divide it by the lesser value of (1) 5 yrs or (2) the contract length. So 6.5M x 6 / 5 = 7.8M.</i></div></div>
Nice catch.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 26, 2016 at 10:44 a.m.
Thread:
Trouba
Jets want a young player to keep with their developing core (Ehlers, Laine). It's Olli Maata or bust for PIT.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 15, 2016 at 5:17 p.m.
Thread:
Thoughts on these trades?
And from the Rangers perspective what exactly are they getting out of that deal? A backup goalie they don't need, a defenseman with an expiring contract, and a 1st? Not appealing to them.
Hunwick for Fehr is at least interesting. Although I don't see him improving the Penguins. Maybe he's a cheaper Ian Cole.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 18, 2016 at 10:03 p.m.
Thread:
Ryan Wilson suggestion
I think you can sign Hudler for much less than $2m at this point. Which is part of the allure of replacing Fehr; finding a cheaper option.
Forum:
NHL
Jul. 25, 2016 at 4:53 p.m.
Thread:
LTIR and Waiving
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Banks</b></div><div><i>To be placed on LTIR the player must be at the NHL level; however, a player CAN clear waivers, be kept at the NHL level, get injured and be placed on LTIR
Once a player clears waivers, there is no obligation to send the player to the minors, they can clear waivers and simply stay on the roster if management so chooses
LTIR use would allow the team to exceed the cap, while loaning the player to the minors would free up to a maximum of $950k in cap space</i></div></div>
Thank you for taking an admittedly muddled question and clarifying it so well.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 15, 2016 at 9:21 a.m.
Thread:
Next offseason
1.) Why trade Fleury for Niemii just to bury him?
2.) Who is your Expansion Draft casualty? Sheary?
It's really hard to gauge 17-18 until we're a lot closer to the Expansion draft. If players are allowed to waive their NMCs and be selected by Vegas I'd expect Fleury would be gone at the Expansion Draft. Either from Vegas choosing him or from a trade to another team that lost a goalie to expansion.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 15, 2016 at 12:23 a.m.
Thread:
Pens (With Cullen and no trades needed)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dejaystarr</b></div><div><i>Having said that, it is a lot of moving, and a few small risks. So you send down exempt players in Pouliot, Murray and Wilson. Take a pair of small(ish) risks and send down Kevin Porter and David Warsofky, neither of which are more than depth. The you take one medium risk and send down Kuhnhackl. At that point cap space should be at $505,834.
At this point you have the ability to stop having only risked Kuhnhackl, Warsofky and Porter as non-exempt and could get Dupuis on LTIR when the team had a cap hit of $72,494,166 resulting in a relief of $3,244,166.
</i></div></div>
That's only 17 skaters and 2 goalies so it's below the minimum roster size. At least I'm pretty sure the lower limit is 18 skaters and 2 goalies. So you can't waive Murray either as he's the cheapest goalie (but I see that you said you waived him but didn't in order to get to the $505,834 number).
<div class="quote">Quote: <i>That's where the professionals come in. (Not I, but the team paid ones). </i></div>
I'm not one either. Just trying to solve the puzzle same as you :)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 14, 2016 at 4:04 p.m.
Thread:
Pens (With Cullen and no trades needed)
What was your roster when you put Dupuis on LTIR?
Forum:
NHL
Jul. 14, 2016 at 12:39 p.m.
Thread:
LTIR and Waiving
Can a team Waive a player and then, once that player clears waivers, place them on LTIR? Or would they have to be recalled to the NHL level prior to being placed on LTIR?
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com