DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Utah Hockey Club
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Utah Hockey Club
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
DD67
Member Since
Jun. 18, 2015
Favourite Team
Pittsburgh Penguins
Forum Posts
332
Posts per Day
0.1
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 14, 2016 at 1:40 p.m.
Thread:
Cap Could Go Up?
lolz
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 14, 2016 at 1:40 p.m.
Thread:
Cap headed down next year?
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sqm918</b></div><div><i>Dont believe everything you read.</i></div></div>
Well here it's shown as coming from two separate sources, the NHL and the NHLPA
<a href="https://twitter.com/MurphysLaw74/status/698249463463333888?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Murphy's Law</a>
Secondly, it's freaking ACGM mode. Everything is a hypothetical 'What If' on this site. Why so serious?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 12, 2016 at 4:58 p.m.
Thread:
Cap headed down next year?
Teams with dead money or bonuses could be really screwed if this happens. It would force a degree of parity because cap teams would have to send players to budget teams at good rates.
Forum:
Site Discussion
Feb. 12, 2016 at 4:30 p.m.
Thread:
Some new ideas
Similar to the Trade Partner Cap Violation notice idea, a notice if a trade puts the partner team over the 50 contact limit.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 12, 2016 at 4:24 p.m.
Thread:
Coyotes Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>exo2769</b></div><div><i>If AZ desperately needs Centers...why not trade with Chicago?</i></div></div>
Is CHI going to give up Shaw or Krueger for Boedker? I mean do they even need a $3.75m wing (probably their 3LW right?) who is also a UFA after this season?
But hey try it in your own ACGM. Can't hurt to see if it would work.
Forum:
General Fantasy Talk
Feb. 12, 2016 at 2:49 p.m.
Thread:
How do you trade ACGMs?
Just curious if anyone else has a system for rating ACGM teams? Mine is
* - Trades are literally impossible due to Cap ceiling, number of NHL Contracts limit, or gross inviability (Tanner Glass for Connor McDavid straight up)
** - Trades are severely one sided, create bad roster imbalance, or center around the needs of only one team. Acquired players are poor and/or do not fit the team well.
*** - Team is viable and decently constructed. Trades are close to fair value. Acquired players may be less than ideal but provide average value.
**** - Trades are fair value to both teams. Acquired players represent an improvement for the team. Long term questions remain about the roster.
***** - Trades are fair value and fulfill needs for both teams. Acquired players will give both teams a marked improvement / meet their respective goals. Contracts are balanced. Team will feature a high quality roster for the near and long term.
I try to use this guide with every team I rate. And I'm not afraid to change my rating if I'm convinced that my initial evaluation missed something.
How do others rate teams?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 12, 2016 at 2:24 p.m.
Thread:
Coyotes Trade
Agree Boedker is worth much more. Also just as an aside the Coyotes desperately need Centers. Bonino and Cole could be good targets for them. The question is what you'd get back.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 12, 2016 at 10:50 a.m.
Thread:
What is Schultz Worth?
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mhockey91</b></div><div><i>Schultz still has a lot of potential and I believe that other teams would pay more then that. I also don't think that Schultz would be the right answer for our team as GMJR should be interested in a more steady, reliable D to play alongside Derrick Pouliot.</i></div></div>
There's an old adage that Defenders take 300 NHL games to mature. Schultz will have that number by the end of this season. I think what you see is about what you'll get with him. And what you see is a player that was mismanaged by a bad franchise.
The other problem with this trade proposal is the Oilers have 49 of 50 NHL contracts. So you can't do a 3 for 1 swap.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 12, 2016 at 9:28 a.m.
Thread:
What is Schultz Worth?
If the oil get more than used goalie equipment for Schultz it'll be too much.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 10, 2016 at 8:53 p.m.
Thread:
This one makes sense
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rosatoa1367</b></div><div><i>As for my last post I legitametly think STL who's looking for scoring would give up Shatty for a package including Loui and a first</i></div></div>
Media reporting that STL is no longer looking at Drouin due to the injury to Pietrangelo. I don't think they have the depth at D to make a deal like that.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 10, 2016 at 5:31 p.m.
Thread:
Roll the dice
Thanks you both. While I too think DP is a very valuable asset, I think it's worth considering what he'd return in a trade. Because the left D is an area of strength thanks to Dumolin having a breakout year. I agree with you both that it ought to be a very good return if he's moved.
I think either Nichushkin or Drouin would be about on par talent wise. I think in the long run Drouin end up replacing Kunitz. Kunitz's chemistry with Crosby is best demonstrated by his area passes. So getting a play maker like Drouin would make up for that. Nichushkin is a shooter, a big body, and if you feel LW is a bigger need I imagine he could play LW. But with Sprong and Bennett gone I think both wings need young talent.
Thank you both for commenting. Glad others feel it's fair and reasonable.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 9, 2016 at 5:19 p.m.
Thread:
re-sign the rfas
That trade is fair in terms of talent. But I don't think TBL has the cap space to resign Vatanen (assuming they keep Stamkos). That and I think Ducks' mgmt doesn't approve of Drouin's attitude are reasons why I don't think that deal happens. On paper though it's good.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 9, 2016 at 3:53 p.m.
Thread:
STEMPNIAK
You were doing so well until that EDM trade. Wth man?! Did you see Schultz in the last game? EDM was a Corsi +/- of 0 without him and -11 with him. He generated more short handed chances than offense on the PP.
Tldr Schultz is AWFUL. Why trade for him at all, let alone Pouilot +?
Forum:
NHL Trades
Feb. 9, 2016 at 1:11 p.m.
Thread:
(OTT / TOR) - Phaneuf, Frattin, Bailey, Rupert, Donaghey for Cowen, Greening, Michalek, Lindberg
Leafs win by getting rid of the albatross contract. It'll be interesting to see Phaneuf with Karlsson.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 7, 2016 at 11:07 a.m.
Thread:
Cup push
Mortgaging the future for an overpriced veteran rental. Yeah that sounds like Pittsburgh.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 5, 2016 at 10:46 a.m.
Thread:
Next season with Fleury trade
The problem here is the Jets have their goalie of the future in Hellybuk. They won't want Fleury for the same reason Pit is dealing him.
Flames really are the team most in need of a Goalie. Others after that would be Sabers, Jackets, Coyotes, and Hurricanes if they can ditch Ward.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 4, 2016 at 11:15 p.m.
Thread:
Penguins deadline day moves
I honestly think I'd rather have Bennett and Rust than Thorburn and Skille. McGinn is a good get. I'm not a believer in Polak but he at least fits a bit of a need. I can understand it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 4, 2016 at 11:09 p.m.
Thread:
SCoC Article
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div><i>If Montreal were to trade Subban, think it would be for young player. But certainly it the Boston trade might be for good for teams needs.
How's this....Subban for Oilers RNH & Nurse.</i></div></div>
Geeze that's kind of the starting point right? That actually makes a ton of sense for both sides.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 4, 2016 at 2:37 p.m.
Thread:
Pens
Yeah pretty much on board with mtdavis. Although I don't think Killorn is > Pouilot +, his logic and points are all spot on.
Why even put Sheary at C? If the bottom 6 is that desperate call up Sundqvist. Then you're not scrambling for a UFA wing when 2/3rds of the season is gone.
Teams mostly are what they are by now. Any remaining moved should add depth or acquire futures. Don't think these moves do either.
Forum:
Site Discussion
Feb. 3, 2016 at 6:26 p.m.
Thread:
Retained Salary on mobile
On my mobile device I can retain salary. If I recall correctly you have to add the player to the trade, then select his name in the 'trade area.' That brings up a + sign next to their name. Click the + and you can retain salary. Hope that helps.
Forum:
Site Discussion
Feb. 3, 2016 at 6:24 p.m.
Thread:
ANNOUNCEMENT: Site Merger with CapFriendly
I like the new look! Congrats on the merger.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 3, 2016 at 12:01 p.m.
Thread:
One man's trash
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Pens141994</b></div><div><i>Could be a really good move especially getting rid of Cole's contract altogether and then adding to the forward depth aforementioned. Prince is like another Sheary, small in size but holds good speed and decent set of hands and Greening would most likely stay in the AHL all the time.</i></div></div>
Prince is 2" taller and 30lbs heavier than Sheary. He's not imposing but his size isn't a detriment like Sheary's. I could see him fitting in well and Ottawa has depth at LW.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 31, 2016 at 4:30 p.m.
Thread:
Something along these lines
So comparing the player with the 2nd most shot attempts in the NHL since 2009 to the Ducks 2nd line wing is shoddy analysis, but going back to 2015 to compare a rookie and an established NHL player is OK? Get off your high horse.
It's also ridiculous to say I'm not taking age and contract into account when I've said over and over again that age is the primary issue with this proposal.
I think we agree on more of this then not. So maybe try and leave the implied insults out of it next time when someone tries to answer your questions in good faith.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 31, 2016 at 3:11 p.m.
Thread:
Something along these lines
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>coga16</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DD67</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>coga16</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sqm918</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>coga16</b></div><div><i>those trades are all pie in the sky trades, not even close to fair value</i></div></div>
How do you figure?!? All those trades make perfect sense.</i></div></div>
Silfverberg+ Vatanen for one, those are very talented young pieces for the Ducks, Pouliot is a nice prospect pieces but I don't think he projects any better than Vatanen, Silfverberg is a solid piece but I don't think Hornqvist is any better than him. So ducks giving up big value don't seem to see any improvements, just have to take on more cap, especially having to take a contract dump in Kunitz who is terrible now.
So Pens get the better younger players and more cap relief? So yes its a pie in the sky trade</i></div></div>
So none of those evaluations are correct. Silfverberg has 2nd line production levels. Hornqvist has 1st line production levels. And his cap hit is only $600k more than Silfverberg's for the same term. Vatanen is 3 years older than Pouilot. In 3 years Pouilot is projected as a 1D. At worst he is equal to Vatanen. If you believe in pedigree then Pouilot being a Top 10 pick has the better of Vatanen who is a 4th round pick. Kunitz is included to make the cap hits close to equal.
The big question in this deal would be who wants Pouilot? I doubt the Pens give him up at this point as he's finally ready for the NHL. I don't think the Ducks are wanting to get younger for the same reason the Pens don't; their Core group of players is nearing the end of their prime. That's the reason why this wouldn't happen and not an issue with the respective talent levels of the players involved because just based on talent the Ducks would be getting a much better offering.
Can't say the same about that TBL deal though. That's not a fair offering. And I can't see DET having interest in a 13th forward.</i></div></div>
<a href="http://public.tableau.com/shared/MWQ4RX8YD?:display_count=yes" target="_blank">http://public.tableau.com/shared/MWQ4RX8YD?:display_count=yes</a>
<a href="http://public.tableau.com/shared/S54Z57XNY?:display_count=yes" target="_blank">http://public.tableau.com/shared/S54Z57XNY?:display_count=yes</a>
Then explain to me how all the shot based metrics have these sort of comparisons bw the players. When you put contracts and age into consideration in these moves, no I am not off in the analysis of the players.</i></div></div>
So the first one clearly demonstrates my point that Hornqvist is better than Silfverberg. Thanks. And the second one is an easy explanation too. Pouilot has 36 career NHL games. Vatanen has 170. It's a sample size issue. That's also why you had to go back to 2015 to get data on Pouilot.
Again I said "in 3 years" Pouilot is projected as a 1D. So if that holds true trading Vatanen for Pouilot is at worst resetting the clock. But I can't see that having any appeal for Anaheim for previously stated reasons.
It also helps to look at the raw numbers and not the team relative ones in the WARRIOR charts.
<a href="http://public.tableau.com/shared/MY3RPQWQK?:display_count=yes" target="_blank">http://public.tableau.com/shared/MY3RPQWQK?:display_count=yes</a>
That's where I'm basing my opinion on Silverberg being a 2nd line player.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 31, 2016 at 2:11 p.m.
Thread:
Something along these lines
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>coga16</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sqm918</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>coga16</b></div><div><i>those trades are all pie in the sky trades, not even close to fair value</i></div></div>
How do you figure?!? All those trades make perfect sense.</i></div></div>
Silfverberg+ Vatanen for one, those are very talented young pieces for the Ducks, Pouliot is a nice prospect pieces but I don't think he projects any better than Vatanen, Silfverberg is a solid piece but I don't think Hornqvist is any better than him. So ducks giving up big value don't seem to see any improvements, just have to take on more cap, especially having to take a contract dump in Kunitz who is terrible now.
So Pens get the better younger players and more cap relief? So yes its a pie in the sky trade</i></div></div>
So none of those evaluations are correct. Silfverberg has 2nd line production levels. Hornqvist has 1st line production levels. And his cap hit is only $600k more than Silfverberg's for the same term. Vatanen is 3 years older than Pouilot. In 3 years Pouilot is projected as a 1D. At worst he is equal to Vatanen. If you believe in pedigree then Pouilot being a Top 10 pick has the better of Vatanen who is a 4th round pick. Kunitz is included to make the cap hits close to equal.
The big question in this deal would be who wants Pouilot? I doubt the Pens give him up at this point as he's finally ready for the NHL. I don't think the Ducks are wanting to get younger for the same reason the Pens don't; their Core group of players is nearing the end of their prime. That's the reason why this wouldn't happen and not an issue with the respective talent levels of the players involved because just based on talent the Ducks would be getting a much better offering.
Can't say the same about that TBL deal though. That's not a fair offering. And I can't see DET having interest in a 13th forward.
First
3
4
5
Next
Page 4
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com