DomCholette

DomCholette
Member Since
Jul 7, 2017
Favourite Team
Montreal Canadiens
2nd Favourite Team
Pittsburgh Penguins
Forum Posts
4344
Posts per Day
3.49
Forum Threads
417
Forum: Armchair-GMNov 5 at 11:24
Thread: 3-way trade with VGK and MTL
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SociallyHawkward</b></div><div>Fleury had a pretty bad year behind a really good vegas D. With Chicago's D in front of him he'd be terrible. It's a pure cap dump. I know vegas said they won't give up a 1st to move fleury but that's what it costs. He's old, expensive, and not really good anymore. Only reason he's still on vegas is because nobody is taking on that cap without getting atleast a 1st.

You say it's ridiculous to give MAF negative value but the league agrees with me.</div></div>

second goalie as alot of value for the next 2 years... trading MAF to Calgary or Edm per example with a 3M retain would be better then signing Talbot, smith.. or behind Binnington in STL etc..
They would keep their 1st and retain instead
Forum: Armchair-GMNov 3 at 1:17
Thread: Mantha confirmed
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wreckless</b></div><div>My thoughts on Danault is that he's faced with pretty much a binary choice. Either:
A) in and around 6x$4.25mm from Montreal (could be with a NMC and signing bonuses, if necessary).
B) if he wants to go to the highest bidder, it won't be Montreal. Might be able to get something in and around 6x$5mm from a team like Winnipeg (and I also think he'd be a pretty good fit behind Schiefele). Stastny is only realistically a short term option.

What do you think Hoffman signs for?</div></div>

I agree with Danault description and destination possibility... but I would give him 5-5,3M in MTL long term.
Hoffman... good one... read that he refused offer of 1y x5,5M and only long term was 4y x 4,5M... he must be very dissappointed!
I would suggest Nashville for same as Mantha 4y x 5,7M.. and maybe they even won't protect him!
Forum: Fauteuil - DGOct 29 at 2:47
Thread: missing piece
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HabsRafiki</b></div><div>Vatanen would be a mistake, but would slot in where you currently have Romanov, who would likely move to the LD#2 slot.

That's a significant overpayment for Rackell, but it's likely what you'd have to pay to get him. He's a versatile 40-50 points, but only has 19 points in 46 career playoff games. That's not an indictment, but reason to be wary.

And trade Byron, not Armia, even if you end up eating a bit of his contract. Habs have plenty of speed and Armia gives you much more grit on the wall.</div></div>

Romanov is a unproven offensive D... and we need a PP specialist= Vatanen 1 year deal.
Byron would be harder to move and would cost asset pick or prospect to move him out... we I like is speed.
Armia would be sign as we have no room for him anymore.. lets get a 2nd for him
Getting Rakell at that cost less than 4M a year... would be a great cheap 60pts guy in Tatar replacement in one year... and having 3 proven TOP LW is simply great!