DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
DucksFan55
Member Since
Aug. 24, 2020
Favourite Team
Anaheim Ducks
Forum Posts
115
Posts per Day
0.1
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 5, 2021 at 10:41 p.m.
Thread:
My sens
Comtois is untouchable unless it’s for Eichel
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 25, 2021 at 5:14 p.m.
Thread:
Whole new team - stingy defensively
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jah1722</b></div><div>Ducks pass. They take on more cap and give up a 2nd. The sole reason of moving Henrique would be to get rid of his cap.</div></div>
they get a better player with less term. They can afford the cap hit and they need someone who can score to pair with Zegras for his development.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 20, 2021 at 9:29 p.m.
Thread:
Define Astronomical
This really isn't a bad offer
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 20, 2021 at 9:19 p.m.
Thread:
Define Astronomical
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GoHabsGo99</b></div><div>honestly, I think Comtois will be a similar type of player, maybe a "Tkachuk Lite" + whoever you take a #3 will be better for the team</div></div>
I see what you’re saying. Not scared to get a little gritty and is willing to throw but still can put up numbers.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 20, 2021 at 9:18 p.m.
Thread:
Define Astronomical
My Ducks untouchables would be Z, Drysdale and Comtois.
With that being said I’d do some of these crazy trades you see on here for Eichel to acquire Tkackuk.
Comtois-Zegras-Tkackuk. I could see crazy numbers being put up by the three for years.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 20, 2021 at 8:20 p.m.
Thread:
Define Astronomical
honestly, I think Comtois will be a similar type of player, maybe a "Tkachuk Lite" + whoever you take a #3 will be better for the team
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 21, 2021 at 1:28 p.m.
Thread:
Ducks Fan
It's not that Anaheim wouldn't give up Zegras for PLD, it's that they won't give him up.
I think the easiest way to talk about this is like this-
Anaheim finished 2nd worst in the NHL this year. They are (easily) 2 years away from being anywhere close to competitive. Trading 2 of their top 3 youngsters, plus 3 OA, all to finish 6th-7th-8th worst instead of 2nd worst makes zero sense at all. Add to that the fact that there's nothing saying that Eichel won't use his NMC to handcuff the team after (yet another) non-playoff year, and demand his way out. No need to discuss the injury, as there's quite literally nobody around that knows how that'll play out.
I don't know...if you were Buffalo and you didn't have Eichel, would you trade Cozens, Quinn, 1OA, Tage, and whoever for a player that is very, very good, but doesn't get you anywhere close to the playoffs? Doesn't seem like the smartest plan, IMO.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 21, 2021 at 1:20 p.m.
Thread:
Ducks Fan
Let me start by saying where the Ducks fans have got Zegras and Drysdale are off the table from Link here: https://www.thefourthperiod.com/jun-2021/ducks-plan-on-exploring-trade-market
"The Ducks have made it clear they have no interest in moving top prospects Trevor Zegras and Jamie Drysdale"
David Pagnotta (editor-in-chief for the 4th period) is a very reliable and trusted source, especially in southern California, so if he says they are reportedly off the table, there's a good chance there's some level of truth to it.
There are so many reasons both Zegras and Drysdale are off the table, it isnt because Eichel isnt worth that, its because the Ducks are not in a position to give that up to get him
ANA finished above one team last season, and that was BUF, why would Eichel not demand a trade the second he touches down in ANA if they are worse than BUF after the trade.
If the Ducks give up the package above, their top 9 next season would be some semblance of this
Olofsson-Eichel-Rakell
Jones-Henrique-Silfverberg
Steel-Lundestrom-Heinen
To me that is worse than the top 9 BUF had last year.
The issue Ducks fans have with giving up Zegras/Drysdale++ for Eichel has nothing to do with Eichels value at all, It has everything to do with the current state of the Ducks roster, and how they would still be a bottom 10 team in the league with a much more bleak future if they do this trade, and Eichel surely wouldnt be happy going to a place with a worse forward group than BUF had
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 20, 2021 at 1:59 p.m.
Thread:
Finding a happy medium with BUF
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jah1722</b></div><div>The RHD thing is a little over played. Sure it’d be nice but Lindholm can drag guys along. They need scoring so much more. Scoring is the biggest need and then you patch the holes later.
Also I’ve long said Eichel won’t be a duck. Personally the most I’d give up is 3OA, Terry, Perrault, and some combo of Lundestrom, Steel, Jones, Mahura but that won’t be enough. Reinhart makes more sense.
Drysdale and Zegras will be wearing duck uniforms come opening night.</div></div>
Comtois + 3rd overall + Henrique and another decent prospect.
Trade for Killorn or Palat for cheap.
Zegras-Eichel-Rakell
Palat-Danault-Terry
Lundestrom-Getzlaf-Silfverberg
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 10, 2021 at 5:50 p.m.
Thread:
PDOcast Bruins Deal
They are talking Rakell and Manson currently.
I like lindholm, don’t see them moving him, even if he is injured.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 10, 2021 at 7:46 p.m.
Thread:
Manson and Rakell Predictions
I think Carolina is smarter to go with a rental since it's only a 3rd pair defenceman that they're looking for and won't have to worry about protecting him with Seattle. I think he'd also get a bit more, closer to what Toronto gave up for Muzzin. I'm not that high on Fleury, but he could be an interesting piece. Would just think that Anaheim would want a better prospect instead.
I also think Rakell gets a lot more. The reported cost is apparently high and I just don't see this as quite enough. I'd imagine it'd be 2 good prospects that Anaheim would ask for.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 4, 2021 at 4:38 p.m.
Thread:
Rakell realistic
Trade is fair value but you can keep Malgin. Besides, under certain obscure but not entirely unlikely circumstances (mostly not wanting or having to protect Dermott and Holl), you might need Malgin to be a qualifying forward.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 1, 2021 at 12:01 a.m.
Thread:
Rakell rumours
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>themostleaf33</b></div><div>I mean.. we all know the Kapanen and Goodrow trades were overpayments, and at least those guys can play some defence. Rakell is purely offence but he hasn't really been producing</div></div>
"Rakell is purely offence"?!? Where did you get that idea? If that were true, he wouldn't be playing at all in the midst of his current offensive doldrums, he'd have joined Adam Henrique on the waiver wire.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 28, 2021 at 11:14 p.m.
Thread:
Rakell rumours
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CeciGOAT</b></div><div>Maybe amirov but not Robertson he’s untouchable.</div></div>
Amirov's skilled and have nice potential, but he isn't exactly a scoring winger. More of a skilled play driver with good hands.
The value is there though.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 28, 2021 at 11:01 p.m.
Thread:
Rakell rumours
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>themostleaf33</b></div><div>True the offence on that team is lacking. Okay what if it was Mikheyev instead of Engvall</div></div>
They have already too many 3rd liners in that roster. I dunno if Mikheyev would add anything to the team they don't already have in a sense.
Honestly the most sensible option for the Ducks is probably Rakell for Robertson 1-on-1, should they trade with the Leafs. What the Ducks need the most is a young scoring winger, and I dunno if any but Robertson fits the bill from the Leafs.
Don't think the Leafs would be interested in that though.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 28, 2021 at 10:49 p.m.
Thread:
Rakell rumours
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>justaBoss</b></div><div>More or less the deal with the whole Ducks team. He's still most likely their best forward.
It wouldn't do if they traded their top market asset for low value supplementary assets. ANA would be much better with by just keeping Rakell.</div></div>
True the offence on that team is lacking. Okay what if it was Mikheyev instead of Engvall
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 28, 2021 at 10:39 p.m.
Thread:
Rakell rumours
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>themostleaf33</b></div><div>Maybe take out Hallander then</div></div>
So you want a 2 mill Rakell for just a 1st. When guys like Goodrow, Rakell , Kapanen got way more?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 28, 2021 at 10:30 p.m.
Thread:
Rakell rumours
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>themostleaf33</b></div><div>Eh.. idk man his stats haven't been great this year</div></div>
switch 2nd to 1st
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 28, 2021 at 11:56 a.m.
Thread:
Who is going to be available
Henrique and Hutton -- very available
Rakell and Manson -- available for a reasonable price, which I define as a 2021 second and an A prospect
Getzlaf, Lindholm, Silfverberg -- don't see them being traded
Heinen and Jones -- possible
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 24, 2021 at 5:12 p.m.
Thread:
Gibson Trade Thoughts
Ducks decline swiftly. Gibson is their “team”. They lose him they enter a “second” rebuild unless they find themselves in another Andersen/Gibson situation; which they aren’t in before or after this trade.
I don’t like either prospect for Anaheim and the first is whatever.
Trading Gibson must either
A) be a benefit for the ducks
B) a more then fair trade to signify the movement of their star
C) be a move out of necessity (having too many goalies)
They are in none of these situations
I think this is where people get lost. I’m not saying/ ducks fans are not saying Gibson is worth 4 firsts, a top prospect and more (I mean some crazy people will but you get what I’m saying)
@op and <a href="/users/ryminister_27" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@ryminister_27</a> reading your posts comments (which is actually fair value rymi)
The ducks must look at this trade and say; yes it is worth losing our spine. This trade isn’t it. Rymi yours is fair but as I said, the ducks must WANT to accept the trade, not be satisfied. They need to go; oh damn. It is trading their best player but more so; the one player that will allow them to win. Their only game breaker. And he’s in net which is a very hard to find position.
It’s not the same as trading a top line player or trading a regular goalie. If that clarifies anything. He’s not worth the entire bank, but he won’t be cheap. Will he be worth it? Maybe not.
Could he be traded for this, I guess; but do I see happening? No.
I wouldn’t trade for him if I was any team unless the ducks were selling him, meaning theyre the ones initiating the trade not me buying him and having to pay premium.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 24, 2021 at 5:12 p.m.
Thread:
Gibson Trade Thoughts
I actually had an idea about this not too long ago here:
https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/2232203
My thought was that it's more important to get Zegras some scoring help up front than to have a goalie that by the time Anaheim will competing, Gibson will be declining anyways.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 24, 2021 at 5:10 p.m.
Thread:
Gibson Trade Thoughts
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jah1722</b></div><div>That would be an easy pass. Ducks have Dostal playing well in the AHL. Goalie prospects are a no thanks.</div></div>
Don't be set with one good goalie prospect in the pipeline. Some good competition is always good. Then whatever one develops slower you can trade for other assets - that's how a rebuild works. Although I agree I wouldn't make the focal point of the deal a goalie prospect, but I wouldn't throw one out just because a good ones in it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 21, 2021 at 6:52 p.m.
Thread:
Zegras called up
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Salzy</b></div><div>I'd be lying if I said I wasnt nervous</div></div>
In the same boat. But, I think the kid has earned it. Whats the contract year limit?
How many games do you think he gets in this stint?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 21, 2021 at 5:50 p.m.
Thread:
Zegras called up
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>Let’s gooooo I love him</div></div>
I'd be lying if I said I wasnt nervous
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 21, 2021 at 5:49 p.m.
Thread:
Zegras called up
Let’s gooooo I love him
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com