Duggysdanglers

Member Since

May 29, 2017

Favourite Team

Boston Bruins

2nd Favourite Team

Edmonton Oilers

Forum Posts

3594

Posts per Day

1.4

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 1 at 1:51 p.m.

Thread: Sens Offseason

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>StutzlesNumber1Fan</b></div><div>Pinto is not signing for 1M$ lmao. Try 4+ even on a bridge deal.</div></div>

He missed half the season for gambling. Yes? So he takes some punishment for that.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 29 at 3:04 p.m.

Thread: Maybe

Might get a second and a third. It’s tough to get good value for a G.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 23 at 6:45 p.m.

Thread: Flames Future

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jcambers</b></div><div>I think we've seen recently that CGY are not going to keep Pelletier in the NHL if he's playing 4th line minutes. Same with Zary.</div></div>

The lines are whatever. So, third line?

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 17 at 1:25 a.m.

Thread: Ballsy or idiotic

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SensFanFromTO</b></div><div>Both</div></div>

Ya!! I thought they fired Dorion.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 10 at 2:11 p.m.

Thread: Markstrom offseason

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>80% of players who go through arbitration are on a new team in 2 years. Ullmark has a 16 team NTC. If you limit yourself to only the west you end up with 1 potential buyer. LAK.

Any goalie in the league you go after.

Or, if Markstrom comes at a reasonable price that fairly values his contract, age, and historical play, sure you trade for him.

If you’re going to overpay (like Calgary wants for Markstrom) might as well overpay for someone else</div></div>

It will definitely be hard to move JM without RS. I’d say $1.5-2 m in RS. Not sure Conroy wants to do that.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 10 at 1:41 p.m.

Thread: Markstrom offseason

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>For the prices Calgary fans want for Markstrom (NJD 2024 1st+Holtz)??

Potentially everyone but Shesterkin, Helle, Vasy, Sorokin, Demko. (And if NYI decides to rebuild at any point Sorokin could be available) Oops I forgot to include Oetter on my list of goalies I’d rather have.</div></div>

Right. I suppose. Who does NJ go after if not Markstrom? Do they have G prospects that are marinating somewhere? I highly doubt the Bruins move Swayman. Maybe Ullmark but not to a contender in the same Conference.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 10 at 1:35 p.m.

Thread: Markstrom offseason

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>Most goalies don’t age well. Fleury did play decently in Chi.

I don’t think Markstrom will be a top 10 goalie over the next 2 years. He’s paid like a top 10 goalie. Which of these goalies would you take 35 and 36 year old Markstrom over?

Saros, Ullmark, Swayman, Askarov, Shesty, Vasy, Sorokin, Adin Hill, Logan Thompson, Hellebuyuck, Demko, Binner, Ingram, 6K, Jarry, Georgiev, Montembault, Pyotr.

Goalie risk premium, age risk premium, and cap space risk premium all do not help his value. Especially in the offseason.</div></div>

How many of those G are available?

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 10 at 1:23 p.m.

Thread: Hawks Future

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>That is not guaranteed at all. Yes, that is where we currently are in the standings, but the standings are close enough for that not to be a sure thing. We could easily slip back to 3rd or even 4th in the standings, however unlikely that may be. Which means the lottery could push us back to 5th or 6th.

Most of the "major" scouts did have him that high or trending in that direction before he got hurt, and most of them are copy cats, anyway. I have watched a ton of most of these guys, less so when it comes to European leagues, though. If Lindstrom can continue playing the same way he did before injury when he comes back in a week or so, everyones final rankings will have him in the top 5. But, I wouldn't be so sure that "none of those forwards will be there".

There are a lot of teams lower in the standings that need D more than anything else. So if we slip back in the draft order, which is still entirely possible, the forwards could absolutely still be there. We just happen to be a team who doesn't need D as badly as most. We need top of the lineup forwards most of all. Aside from Bedard and maybe Reichel, we have two guys who could MAYBE play in the top 6, in Nazar and Moore. So, imo, that should be the priority. Plus, I don't believe for a second that Levshunov will be the BPA anywhere in the top 5.</div></div>

Fair point. I think Bedard and Demidov could make a sexy top line. Ideally TB misses the playoffs and that pick is closer to 11-13 ish and Tig Iginla is available. That would be dope!! Bedard Demidov/ Iginla is sweet!!
I highly doubt the Hawks win enough games to climb in the standings past maybe SJ.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 10 at 1:04 p.m.

Thread: CBJ Future

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SK101</b></div><div>Okay but you said they’ve been drafting top 10 every year when it’s only been twice in the last 7 seasons</div></div>

Well whatever. They’ve had high picks for many years. We are splitting hairs here. It just seems like the organization is struggling every year.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 10 at 1:01 p.m.

Thread: CBJ Future

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SK101</b></div><div>Bruins have one cup in the last 50 years. If the jackets win one cup in the next 25 years they will match that pace lol</div></div>

Gotta make it past the second round in order to do accomplish that.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 10 at 12:06 p.m.

Thread: CBJ Future

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CaseyFlyman</b></div><div>We last made the playoffs in the 2020 bubble, and could realistically push for the playoffs in 2025 despite a near-total roster overhaul (only Werenski, Jenner, Texier, and Elvis remain from that team).

Even the Rangers, the poster child for a historically quick rebuild, missed the playoffs for 4 years (2018-2021). And they had the benefit of a won draft lottery, something Columbus has never had. Kreider and Zibanejad are the only holdovers from both rosters.

People need to adjust expectations here.</div></div>

CBJ should have won at least a couple Draft Lotteries.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 10 at 12:06 p.m.

Thread: CBJ Future

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SK101</b></div><div>They’ve only drafted in the top 10 with their own draft picks twice since 2016 lol</div></div>

16 top ten picks in 23 years of existence!

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 10 at 12:02 p.m.

Thread: CBJ Future

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>squashmaple</b></div><div>Silly us. The much smarter Bruins fan knows better.</div></div>

Playoffs every year. 6 Cups. 3 SCF appearances since 2011. What was that again?

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 10 at 11:35 a.m.

Thread: Next Year Opening Night

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shaners79</b></div><div>Vanecek is in San Jose</div></div>

This would definitely put them in the playoffs next year.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 10 at 11:35 a.m.

Thread: Next Year Opening Night

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shaners79</b></div><div>Vanecek is in San Jose</div></div>

Oh right.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 10 at 11:34 a.m.

Thread: CBJ Future

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CaseyFlyman</b></div><div>Where's Jiricek? "Another wasted year", sure, but we're already the 2nd-youngest team in the league, and ther's 4 CBJ 1st-rounders under the age of 24 in that lineup already (5 if you throw Jiricek in there, which he should be).

The year started with turmoil, got derailed entirely by injury, and the team became allergic to 3rd-periods. A young coach, new GM, and development by the young NHLers should have this team pushing for a playoff spot either next season or the year after if they're all healthy and we're patient.</div></div>

It just seems like they’re in a perpetual rebuild year after year despite having top ten picks year after year.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 10 at 11:33 a.m.

Thread: CBJ Future

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>squashmaple</b></div><div>I’m not sure how you can put together this roster, see there are six Russian names on it, and wonder if two Russians who wanted a beach and a garage, respectively, five years ago might deter them from a certain teenager.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Viqsi</b></div><div>They've got Voronkov 1) as a winger and 2) scratched; that should tell you plenty about how much they were paying attention.</div></div>

Many teams are apprehensive about the Russian factor. None of those players on this CBJ team are star players. Taking a top prospect around 5th overall would likely become a star player. So they have reason to be concerned.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 10 at 10:11 a.m.

Thread: Next Year Opening Night

If the Devils first pick is closer to 10th overall than they will not have to include Holtz in that trade. Or Holtz and Schmid would do it. Don’t be surprised if they send Vanecek plus their first.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 10 at 9:38 a.m.

Thread: Hawks Future

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>Silayev is huge, strong, is an awesome skater, and defends VERY well against men in a pro league. I didn't say better, though. I just like big defensemen that can actually defend and skate well. I wouldn't take him over Lindstrom, Demidov, or Catton.

I honestly hope it doesn't come to that. If they pick him, I want him to be good. Being a bust is not an option. And I'm not saying he will be a bust either, I think he will be fine. I just don't think he is the best player available, and I don't think he is a need for CHI, right now.</div></div>

At this rate the Hawks pick no lower than 3rd overall. So one of those F’s will be there. I do not believe any major scouts have Cayden Lindstrom that high.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 10 at 9:23 a.m.

Thread: Hawks Future

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JK74</b></div><div>Man you're trying to set up the ultimate "I told you so" brother. Me personally, I'll be fine with whoever they draft since their scouts are watching these guys like hawks (see what I did there lol) and know much better than I do which one of these guys would help the team the most.</div></div>

I agree with you in part but I have sometimes been better able to pick players off the draft board than various GMs over the years. Bruins in 2015. Oilers that year as well. Zach Senyshyn- literally whoever the funk that is or was - instead of Barzal.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 10 at 9:17 a.m.

Thread: SJ Next Season with Celebrini Reinhart DeBrusk Toffoli Walker Foegele

Better off for SJ to continue a long drawn out scorched Earth rebuild. With all of the RS for multiple years on the books I’d say they will not start getting better for at least 3 years so be patient.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 10 at 9:12 a.m.

Thread: Hawks Future

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>Also, Buium and Yakemchuk are objectively better than Levshunov. The only thing Buium doesn't have that Levshunov and Yakemchuk do, is a right shot. And Buium is probably the best of the three. Dickinson is good, but very much overrated, and Parekh is a pipe dream that probably isn't gonna work out very well for whoever picks him. Silayev is awesome. The hype around Levshunov is overblown. And this is the last I'll say about it. But bookmark this and let's revisit in a few years.</div></div>

Why is Silayev better?

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 9 at 9:47 p.m.

Thread: AZ Future

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GeneralLandro</b></div><div>I’d guess Durzi gets like 7 x $5,500,000</div></div>

That’s a rip off. He’s a minus all 3 years so far. 0.5 ppg is very good but I’d say bridge deal.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 9 at 5:57 p.m.

Thread: Dumpster Fire SJ

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>littlejerryseinfeld</b></div><div>I don't quite agree</div></div>

That deal without the RS or the 2 third round picks.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 9 at 5:56 p.m.

Thread: Dumpster Fire SJ

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jakdonaghy</b></div><div>Good for Vegas in short term and good for Sharks in long term (hopefully). Most hockey writers love the trade for both teams. Next couple years will be brutal but Sharks are all in on the rebuild, have shed a lot of long term contracts and are well positioned to turn it around</div></div>

They RS on 3 deals with term. Not sure on the positives here. I’m just glad they don’t manage either of my teams.

First23 Next

Page 2

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

Duggysdanglers

Member Since

Favourite Team

2nd Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day