SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Duster

Member Since
Feb. 8, 2017
Favourite Team
Toronto Maple Leafs
Forum Posts
1590
Posts per Day
0.6
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 25, 2019 at 9:40 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jah1722</b></div><div>You showed us that Nylander and Matthews have to play together.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Random2152</b></div><div>I showed you that Nylander makes Matthews a MUCH better player (not the other way around). I showed you that Nylander outperformed Marner in 5v5 possession and offence generated, as well as defensive metrics, but was extremely unlucky in his results (unlike Marner).

Rather than an indignant response, if you are unsure how to read a graph I post, ask. I am happy to explain it.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jah1722</b></div><div>Like I said you showed us graphs that say Nylander has to play with Matthews</div></div>

^ I just want everyone in this thread to revel in the above posters stupidity for a moment... ^

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hurricanes73</b></div><div>I understand what you are saying but I believe that if there was a pesce-nylander trade, 50% of Toronto fans would claim that this was an amazing trade while the other 50% would claim this is a robbery. The 50% that said it was amazing looked at the bright side of things like pesces plus minus/ his contract while the other 5% would look at his point production/offensive ability. It would be a weird day in Toronto as well as on this site because it would be very divided.</div></div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shifttee</b></div><div>I feel I may have caused a Rukus here ?

::working as intended::</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Laudan</b></div><div>Touche</div></div>
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 4, 2019 at 6:43 p.m.
Forum: GM Game 2017-18Nov. 3, 2017 at 9:47 p.m.
Forum: GM Game 2017-18Oct. 31, 2017 at 2:16 a.m.
Forum: GM Game 2017-18Nov. 1, 2017 at 6:41 p.m.