SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Dylhole

Member Since
Jul. 12, 2022
Favourite Team
Edmonton Oilers
Forum Posts
87
Posts per Day
0.1
Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 10, 2023 at 1:02 p.m.
Thread: Spitballing
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>Domi = a 2nd round pick or better
McCabe is not going to be retained for 3 more seasons. Without retention McCabe = 2nd round pick or better.
JP doesn't have much of any value at this point.</div></div>

I could see another pick (especially conditional) added to the deal and I would think Chicago would be willing to retain on McCabe if it got them a first in this draft with how much the cap is likely to increase in the coming years but I could be wrong obviously. JP is necessary for the cap to work and is a zero risk option for Chicago. Maybe the scenery change helps him and they get a useable young player and if not he walks.

So call it a 1st, 2nd, Schaefer and JP for Domi and McCabe retained. Think some people on EDM and CHI sides could complain about that which likely means it's pretty fair
Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 10, 2023 at 12:40 p.m.
Thread: Spitballing
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>Hawks decline. The 2023 1st and Schaffer are probably enough for McCabe half retained IF Hawks are willing to retain for the extra 2 seasons. But Domi half retained costs your 2023 2nd. Puli has little value. He's overpaid for what he brings, and his $3m qualifying offer next year essentially makes him a pending UFA. Hawks will take him to make your cap work, but he has no value in this trade.</div></div>

Yeah you could be right. I would be surprised if the Oil pay Schaefer and a first for McCabe retained alone but who knows. Adding a second sounds reasonable to me though.

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>goodfella</b></div><div>You don't seriously think that's a good trade do you?

What other team has retained that much for that long around the league? Do you think there is a reason there isn't one?</div></div>

Just my opinion. Realistically I doubt SJ is able to move Karlsson at all because any team that would be looking at acquiring him likely cannot commit to that kind of term. Contracts like that are more likely to end in a buyout or LTIR than anything else. If big money deals like such were so easy to move Kane probably wouldn't still be in Chicago
Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 10, 2023 at 12:15 p.m.
Thread: Spitballing
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>glarson17</b></div><div>They are also taking nearly $5 mil in Barrie back and Bouchard needs a new contract. Getting the Norris leader now for less than $6 mil aav is a steal. I don’t see how this puts the sharks in a better cap position</div></div>

Well Barrie's deal expires at the end of next season and he can be used as a trade piece next deadline as a rental to a contender (especially if the cap goes up more than 1 mill). Don't disagree it would be a huge steal to have EK under $6 mill this year but he's struggled to stay healthy already and 4 more years on a player approaching their mid-30s isn't something teams are paying top dollar for these days. I mean hell, Vegas traded Pacioretty away for free. It's hard to move big contracts with significant term
Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 10, 2023 at 11:56 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 7, 2022 at 5:17 p.m.
Thread: Boring
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>gretzkyghosts</b></div><div>Foegele would not make the Sabre line up.

$2,750,000 until 2023-24 (UFA)
37 Warren Foegele L 82 12 14 26 26/82 = 0.317 ppg

Dylhole Which one of those four LW do you see Warren replacing?
Every one has more pp/g than he:
53 Jeff Skinner L 80 33 30 63 63/80 = 0.788 ppg
71 Victor Olofsson L 72 20 29 49 49/72 = 0.681 ppg
74 Rasmus Asplund L 80 8 19 27 27/80 = 0.338 ppg
28 Zemgus Girgensons L 56 10 8 18 18/56 = 0.321 ppg
He does not score well so he is not going to knock out Olofsson nor Skinner.
He is paid much more than Girgensons or Asplund who PK which he does not.

He does not play center so he will not replace Thompson, Krebs, Cozens nor Mittelstadt:
72 Tage Thompson R 78 38 30 68 68/78 = 0.872 ppg
37 Casey Mittelstadt C 40 6 13 19 19/40 = 0.48 ppg
19 Peyton Krebs C 48 7 15 22 22/48 = 0.46 ppg
24 Dylan Cozens C 79 13 25 25/79 = 0.317 ppg

He certainly will not replace Tuch, Quinn, Hinostroza or Okposo at RW:
89 Alex Tuch R 50 12 26 38 38/50 = 0.760 ppg
21 Kyle Okposo R 74 21 24 45 45/74 =0.608 ppg
29 Vinny Hinostroza RW 62 13 12 25 25/62 = 0.403 ppg</div></div>

Well since you only listed 3 RWs I will say he replaces the fourth. Since he is a LW/RW after all.