SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

ELEATE

Member Since
Oct. 2, 2016
Favourite Team
Montreal Canadiens
2nd Favourite Team
Edmonton Oilers
Forum Posts
103
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 11, 2017 at 3:44 p.m.
Thread: We need a RW!
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ollie79</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>We_Want_The_Cup</b></div><div>I hear you need a RW. Is there any Gallagher+ trade you would consider from Montreal? It'll definitely save you from cap troubles next season to have someone on the same cap contract, but longer.</div></div>

Maybe Backlund for Gallagher+Sherbak?</div></div>

Not sure this makes it backlund isnt a #1 center (montreal already as 2 decent number 2 center) also lets asume he extend on trade otherwise it never happens as gallagher as a really friendly deal.
Sherback is fair to put in the trade, as an nhler plis a prospect seems fair for a center in this market but not this center (i know we are not getting monahan, whit this package or any other.) I dont think mtl and Calgary are good dance partner.

Maybe sign vanek the guy is still able to produce can be really good in a midle six position.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 8, 2017 at 4:11 a.m.
Thread: IN: Gaudreau, Bennett, Draisaitl ; OUT: Pacioretty, Galchenyuk, Gallagher
I think its an over payment for leon, dont get me wrong the guys is really good and is a 1c on any team that asnt a guy like mcdavid or crosby.
But galchenyuk is actually a really good winger, he is still young but clearly as elit skills (as a winger) and gallagher well a girthy rw that plays a really good 200ft game on a super friendly deal isnt easy to come by.
I do realise you have to give talent to get talent back, but i dont think that montreal is a better team with that trade the center becomes way better but the wings take a beating.

As for the calgary deal i havent seen enough of bennet to aay really but those two guys better be able to snipe otherwise without pacio and galchenyuk montreal will have pletty of talent and puckhandling skills upfront but nobady to shot said puck.

Anyways intresting ideas!
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 5, 2017 at 5:36 p.m.
Thread: What returns would this package get? COMMENT reliant post
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawkisles</b></div><div>I agree the Isles need to send back cap in most trades. Kulemin would likely be the go-to cap dump asset there. However, I have to wonder if PHI would take Clutterbuck. With his playstyle, PHI fans would adore him. And I like you idea of Simmonds, I get a feeling he'd fit in on the island.

Would PHI be willing to retain salary on Giroux? If so, maybe 3 1sts and Clutterbuck for 2m retained Giroux?</div></div>

The value for phili is certenly there but the probleme with retainning salary is the term of giroux contract, by the time it ends all their young player eill be on new an expencive contract i wouldnt see a probleme with 1.25 mil maybe 2m is okay if phili then trade other pricy player in the same rebuild optic.
Would certainly be intresting a 1-2 punch of giroux-tavares would give crosby-malkin a run for their money.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 5, 2017 at 4:52 p.m.
Thread: Going the distance
The drai trade makes a lot of sence dor both parties but im not sure id go for it from montreal perspective, i dont care much for shlemko and the 2019 1st but gallagher as such an insanely good contract and plays a good 200feet game whilst playing agaisnt the opoding top 2 line. And 2018 is going to be so deep that first picks are going to be worth a lot.

The byron trade doesnt make sence, at least for the next two uear you make the team weaker whilst loosing a 3rd pick, if galgary where to jad a 3rd pick and montreal removing theirs then maybe, but not quit sure its worth it.

Im not sure on what is green situation in detroit or if he would extend with montreal lost of factor but assuming he wants out and extend in montreal (mccarron also need to extend on a two way for it to happen) i could see the trade happening but only in those conditions