EhRobin3

Member Since

Jan. 2, 2020

Favourite Team

Montreal Canadiens

Forum Posts

114

Posts per Day

0.1

Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 15, 2020 at 3:35 p.m.

Thread: Cole Caufield

Toffoli and Caufield both can play on the Left Wing which is Bergivins plan. Next offseason I don't see Montreal bringing back Tatar and Armia and Hopefully using Caufield and Ylonen in their places

Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 15, 2020 at 3:26 p.m.

Thread: Monteal Potential for lines

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>p1015983</b></div><div>I don't think habs need to include a top prospect in a trade involving Byron a 20 goal scorer.</div></div>

I've seen a lot of people say that they wouldn't take byron so I figured if I added a sweetener they'd be less likely to decline

Forum: Mock-DraftOct. 15, 2020 at 2:47 p.m.

Thread: Too Early Redraft of 2020

How is the draft over and people still giving Montreal Hendrix Lapierre

Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 14, 2020 at 6:06 p.m.

Thread: Kicked tires on Gallagher apparently

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>They said on 91.9 Sports FM (Montreal) that Dorion kicked tires on Gallagher</div></div>

And the habs just announced an extension so I believe that source a little bit more

Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 14, 2020 at 1:11 p.m.

Thread: All J Habs Team

Honestly, I'm truly impressed by how we have this many players with names that start with J and you didn't trade for anyone

Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 27, 2020 at 8:02 p.m.

Thread: What Would It Take

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jo_Habs77</b></div><div>I wouldn't make that bet. I think you take the #16 pick for the player you want and leave it at that. I'd be fine for moving one of those 3 LD in a trade, I feel like one of them has to. But Harris might be the odd man out here, Norlinder is the new hope of elite skill, and Struble was one of the youngest players of his draft year and the only one who is 19yrs old (his B-day was like 3 weeks ago). Plus, remember when Bergy called him a "Greek god" Think of the potential memes!

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">ICYMI - With the 2020 <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NHLDraft?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NHLDraft</a> looming, <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/TSNHockey?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#TSNHockey</a> provides a draft primer for each of the seven 🇨🇦 <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NHL?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NHL</a> teams...<br><br>Today, we begin with the <a href="https://twitter.com/CanadiensMTL?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@CanadiensMTL</a>: <a href="https://t.co/V0r9duRcrn">https://t.co/V0r9duRcrn</a><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/DraftCentre?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#DraftCentre</a> <a href="https://t.co/d28BClUCKL">pic.twitter.com/d28BClUCKL</a></p>— TSN Hockey (@TSNHockey) <a href="https://twitter.com/TSNHockey/status/1305647821715116037?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 14, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
</div></div>

I'm aware I also did state I don't think Montreal should pursue this in the description, it was just an idea I had because I kinda like the idea of drafting Mysak but we are too high for it to be worth the reach. Also personally have our top 11 prospects ranked as:

1. Romanov
2. Caufield
3. Primeau
4. Norlinder
5. Ylonen
6. Poehling
7. Brooks
8. Fleury
9. Harris
10 Hillis
11. Struble

Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 27, 2020 at 5:10 p.m.

Thread: What Would It Take

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jo_Habs77</b></div><div>What's even the point here? Who do you want MTL to target with those picks?
Cause you're losing a roster player and the team's most promising 2nd round pick in a while (outside Romanov)</div></div>

Ideally id like to target whoever is left of Jarvis Mercer Holloway Amirov or Gunler at 18 and Mysak at 20 also i personally don't see Struble as one of our top 3 LD prospects not that he isn't good I just like Norlinder and Harris more.

Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 27, 2020 at 3:52 p.m.

Thread: What Would It Take

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>zyyyp</b></div><div>they're not moving both unless it's for a high end top 6F or top 4D, this trade is garbage for NJ</div></div>

In essence, you are only losing one of the picks as you still have a pick in the same round except you now have more choices towards who you pick, and as I stated it's assuming you were going to pick a LD with one of the picks and now you have 2 young LD who could potentially be that top 4 defender.

Forum: NHL SigningsSep. 25, 2020 at 2:39 p.m.

Thread: Montreal Canadiens signed Jeff Petry (4 Years / $6,250,000 AAV)

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HawaiianPig</b></div><div>Way to over value prospects. Only KK and Suzuki are poised to get decent bucks at the end of their ELC. Poehling is a bubble player and Primeau has many years behind Carey before we see if he’s an NHL goaltender.

If the Habs end up in cap hell, it won’t be because they signed Jeff Petry for fair value.</div></div>

Unless Kk is in the Hart conversation this year or approaches point per game totals he's probably only going to be in the 3-5 mil range I think only Suzuki is poised to get over 5 mil and depending on Romanov if he comes in like a makar he might warrant it but I think Kk is lower if he is signed before he becomes an RFA

Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 25, 2020 at 1:57 p.m.

Thread: Anaheim

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sala91</b></div><div>Are you willing to switch Poehling for Fleury and the second for a first?</div></div>

Unfortunately not with Bergevin at the helm he has never traded a first-round pick and he doesn't seem to have any inclination to do it maybe he does a swap of the higher pick going to Anaheim but I don't think he would. We would be more likely to give you a second next year and maybe return your 4th if you add a 3rd next year if you really want more value

Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 25, 2020 at 10:35 a.m.

Thread: Lets See if I can Fix the Leafs

Montreal has a log jam at Center and have a lot of left wings we don't need Kerfoot and definitely not for Lehky and a pick

Forum: Mock-DraftSep. 24, 2020 at 5:31 p.m.

Thread: habs picks

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Leemer</b></div><div>If Quinn, Holloway, Mercer are picked in the top 15, then I’m in the Jarvis, Perreault, Gunler selection pool and avoid the extraction pain associated with the KHL and Mother Russia for Amirov. If Foerster falls into the pick 35 -40 range Bergevin should be all over that by trading up some picks or spare parts. Mav Bourque is ok but is not in the same goal scorer category of the players I have mentioned and is NOT the BAP</div></div>

KHL players drafted in the first round they can come over at any time if I recall correctly (I'm probably wrong). However, I do not see why Montreal drafts a first-round Center unless Marco Rossi drops to us because of his size again, based off what we have we have our 2 top centers and Bergevin believes that so I see us going LW more so then RW because we lack Quantity on the right and Quality on the left

Forum: Mock-DraftSep. 24, 2020 at 12:04 p.m.

Thread: Montreal Canadiens Draft List

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kotkaniemi15</b></div><div>Lapierre, Schneider, & Zary are too high IMO. My list would be the same for 1-11, and after that I’d do:

12. Jarvis
13. Mercer
14. Holloway
15. Perreault
16. Amirov</div></div>

I personally have Holloway and Amriov above Mercer and Jarvis because, in my opinion, we need depth RW as we have 2 very solid RW Prospects already in Ylonen and Caufield and we lack top tier LW prospects but we have the depth in Teasdale and Harvey-Pinard. so I'd try to address the lack of high-end talent on the left first over adding more high-end right side talent.

Forum: NHL SigningsSep. 23, 2020 at 11:01 a.m.

Thread: Montreal Canadiens signed Jake Evans (2 Years / $750,000 AAV)

Would I be too optimistic to believe that he could have a career similar to Nate Thompson? He seems strong defensively he can man the 4th line and if necessary can probably step up into a 3rd line role for stints he won't be a star or flashy pickup for any team but will usually be a solid pickup and could be in the league for 10ish years.

Forum: Mock-DraftSep. 22, 2020 at 3:32 p.m.

Thread: First Mock In A While (Top 20)

Even if Montreal Drafted Mercer he wouldn't be Paired with Suzuki and Caufield as he is an RW and Montreal's coaching staff has shown a preference for playing players on their stick side with the exception being out of necessity. Also, our LW pool is by far our weakest in quality and RD is our Weakest in Quantity

Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 19, 2020 at 1:54 p.m.

Thread: Just Thinking Quite Simplistic

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Smokingun71</b></div><div>If I am the Oilers I don’t even consider including Lavoie in a trade for a player turning 30 and going to be a UFA in a year.</div></div>

If Edmonton had a 3rd or 4th I would have thrown that in and probably thrown in one of Jacob Olofsson or Jordan Struble so it would be a higher prospect for a lower prospect and a roster player but I couldn't figure out all the little stuff to make it not feel like an overpayment.

Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 17, 2020 at 3:55 p.m.

Thread: Every teams BEST prospect

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TMLBRIAN</b></div><div>I would go Sandin over Robertson but it is close.

For Montreal maybe Romanov over Caufield but it is close? (Montreal fans would need to chime in here)</div></div>

I'd say you could lean either way if you look at it Romanov has a higher floor but Caufield has a higher Ceiling. I'd personally say Romanov though

Forum: Mock-DraftSep. 17, 2020 at 9:14 a.m.

Thread: Tweeking my mock (Please comment what you think)

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ivan092033</b></div><div>I personally think they should take a risk but knowing Montreal's staff, I think they'll play it safe</div></div>

I agree that they should because to me Holloway seems to check off every box I see us needing. He has Size, Speed, his offence isn't elite but it will be fine if paired with Suzuki, he isn't a defensive liability and I personally see him having a decent floor (Around a bottom 6 Fw).

Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 16, 2020 at 6:32 p.m.

Thread: Jets are screwed

Montreal declines that trade without a 2nd thought. That trade takes our 2nd best RW (our weakest position) and trades for another LD who would be the 6th Best LD on Montreal (Behind Chairot, Edmondson, Romanov Kulak and Mete) the only way they even consider is if Roslovic is thrown in instead of Niku or Vesalinen is added to the return

Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 9, 2020 at 3:26 p.m.

Thread: Montreal Canadiens Realistic v2

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MNBassman</b></div><div>12 months ago most Habs fans wouldn’t have traded Lindgren for Connor McDavid...</div></div>

I know this is hyperbole however, I'm confused as to who said Lingren was untouchable going back a year the only players we wouldn't trade (except for it being a massive overpayment) were:

Kotkeniemi
Suzuki
Poehling
Romanov
Primeau
Domi
Danault
Gallagher
Tatar
Weber
Petry
Price

Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 24, 2020 at 8:01 p.m.

Thread: Domi

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HadesOfSoCal</b></div><div>Ah yes, Tolerant Habs fans who think if it’s not 8OA for a 2C it’s not enough.</div></div>

No, the trade value is fine I'd prefer a 2nd instead of the 3rd or the addition of a 5th to the trade but that's only if he had a contract when traded. My main problem with this trade is that we are giving up Domi for 2 players who probably wouldn't make the Habs because they happen to be in our 2 deepest prospect position pools if they were a winger and an RD id be all for this trade.

Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 24, 2020 at 7:11 p.m.

Thread: Smoke

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>i feel like theyd want more if he's re-signed, you know MTL fans lol</div></div>

Actually I believe it's pretty close the only thing that would make me like it more is if you switched Hajek for Lundkvist or Skinner if either of them is near the same value as Hajek, mainly because they are RD which is a weaker Prospect position for MTL (I don't know your defensive prospects outside of Keandre Miller and Adam Fox so I'm not sure if those players are above B+ prospects but I don't think Skinner is)

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 19, 2020 at 10:17 a.m.

Thread: Could this team of some popular buyout candidates make the playoffs

They'd do better against the Red Wings then the habs did probably but that's about it

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 15, 2020 at 11:20 p.m.

Thread: Im fully prepared to get roasted for this Leafs GM attempt - MTL LAK CHI

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>moli92</b></div><div>you can never have too many C prospects. half the time they are converted to wingers anyway. besides the position do you think the trade is fair?</div></div>

While that usually is true Montreal has 8 (9 if you count Evans) young Cs with NHL potential [this means has a strong chance at one day making an nhl roster] (Kk, Poehling, Suzuki, Evans, Hillis, McShane, Olofsson, Houde, Ikonen) while we have really only 3 Wing prospects with NHL potential (Teasdale[LW], Caulfield[RW], Ylonen[RW]) and only 3 RD prospects (Juulsen, Brooks, Fleury) and a decent handful of LD prospects most notably Romanov and Norlinder (HMs to Fairbrother Struble Harris). So yes under normal circumstances a team cant have too many C prospects the barren support in other positions is far too prominent for Montreal to not address. I have said for a while that if Montreal leaves this draft picking a C in the first round that isn't named Byfield I'm going to be annoyed because we now have bigger needs to address than Centre.

Ps: sorry if this seems rude I'm tired of seeing teams trade Montreal young C and LDs for our other prospect positions and I needed to rant.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 15, 2020 at 11:39 a.m.

Thread: I saw this on YouTube keep that in mind

I understand the trade from both sides. Montreal gets a more secure Centre for their team and an above-average Defender, while New York gets a first which at the pick Montreal are projected to have should be better than Toews and a wild card Centre that has the potential to be better than Barzal is, however unlikely it may be is up to you but the potential is still there. While I think the trade does make somewhat sense for both sides it only does if Montreal wants to go for it now and New York wants to start a rebuild, both of which I wouldn't do at least right now. So if I was either GM I would decline personally.

First23 Next

Page 2

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

EhRobin3

Member Since

Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day