SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Franking1

Habs fan
Member Since
Jun. 4, 2017
Favourite Team
Montreal Canadiens
2nd Favourite Team
Colorado Avalanche
Forum Posts
145
Posts per Day
0.1
Forum: Fauteuil - DGAug. 31, 2020 at 2:09 p.m.
Thread: realistic
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ALitteral</b></div><div>I'm fine with a prospect swap that involves Ratcliffe, but why would we add a pick. Poehling doesnt fit a need in the organization's depth chart. He isnt demonstrably better than Ratcliffe. I mean he is just another guy in the logjam at center. Its not like we really want him.

Put yourself in our shoes and ask why we would rush to make this trade and throw in an extra asset. 1C and 2C are filled. 3C is Patrick if he's healthy or Frost (better prospect) or Laughton has had success. 4C will be Laughton, Bunnaman, or some old, slow, uninspiring vet (I.E. Thompson).</div></div>

Statisticly, Poehling was better than Ratcliffe. That’s why i put a pick. But i get that we both don’t need more centers and that trade is not happening.
Forum: Fauteuil - DGAug. 27, 2020 at 1:39 p.m.
Thread: Younger and bigger
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>lebronisdagoat</b></div><div>all of them lol

1. laine isnt worth all of that
2. gallagher? u really think montreal will trade gallagher?
3. and why sign koivu if u already got athanasiou back

dont call yourself a habs fan if this is what u want or even think will happen</div></div>
1. You’re probably right this is too much for Laine but i think he would be a perfect fit for the habs. He is big, he is young and he can score a lot of goals. He and Kk would dominate for the next 10+ years.
2. I like Gallagher but I think we should him while he has some good value. Puljujarvi and the 1st have high chances to be better than Gallagher will ever be.
3.Koivu would be a mentor to kk, Suzuki and the rest of the young players.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 6, 2020 at 7:57 a.m.