ARCHIVE ▾

CBA ▾

CALCULATORS ▾

FANTASY-TOOLS ▾

TOOLS ▾

PLAYERS ▾

INTERACTIVE ▾

FunMustBeAlways

Member Since

Jan. 30, 2020

Favourite Team

San Jose Sharks

2nd Favourite Team

San Jose Sharks

Forum Posts

5002

Posts per Day

6.0

ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS

Forum: Armchair-GM5 hours ago

Thread: Feedback Wanted

Yeah good deal for the Sharks

Forum: Armchair-GM5 hours ago

Thread: Sabres October 22

Sharks decline. Nowhere near Kahk's value and the Sharks are gonna trade Reim or Hill first anyway

Forum: Armchair-GM5 hours ago

Thread: ExotxcSZN

The last three trades the Sharks accept but a 3rd and a 6th is Hill's value without Mrazek in there. Try at least 2 2nds and Mrazek for Hill and that's closer. And the Habs are the ones who should be adding in that trade as well.

Forum: Armchair-GM10 hours ago

Thread: New Coach New Arena and the best roster yet

Honestly super hyped. So much more depth and promise going into next season. Wonder if they leave Laroque in the WHL though. Guess we'll see.

Forum: Armchair-GM11 hours ago

Thread: If Campbell Walks

Not getting off the hook with Mrazek without sending someone at least a 2nd to take him

Forum: Armchair-GM12 hours ago

Thread: Competing

Repeat comment :/

Forum: Armchair-GM12 hours ago

Thread: Competing

First trade is fine I guess. Not psyched about trading another second but it’s probably fair.

The second grade Dahlén definitely makes up for whatever negative value simek has so the Sharks shouldn’t be adding at all there

Forum: Armchair-GM21 hours ago

Thread: If Nill is Gone

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ItsTheCracken</b></div><div>Brother, who do you think is taking Burns at 37yo at 8m for 3 more years without y’all taking a contract back?? That’s how that works. You’ve 3 terrible D contracts, you’re swapping one out for a forward K here.</div></div>

My guy Vlasic and Karlsson are the unmovable ones. Burns isn’t. Yes he’s 37 but this year played on a bad team, lead the league in minutes played, and was 12th in D-man scoring. I don’t expect most teams to be able to take on Burns’ full cap but making it work would look like the Sharks retaining 1-2 million max or us taking back Khudobin. Or maybe getting a third party involved to retain some $$. Taking on Seguin without dumping an <em>actually</em> bad contract like Vlasic or EK65 would be disastrous and would defeat the point of trading Burns in the first place.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 11:45 p.m.

Thread: Sharks major overhaul

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>papishark</b></div><div>I dont think he would be the worst to have on the team, but is a little pricey. Could play him one year and dump him at the offseason to make room for Meier contract.</div></div>

Yeah he's fine but it's more money and term than I'd want to take on even though he's probably more or less worth it. At least it's a moveable contract.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 11:35 p.m.

Thread: If Nill is Gone

point of trading burns would be to save cap.

The Sharks get a worse player signed for longer and save no money here. Doesn't make sense.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 11:33 p.m.

Thread: Sharks major overhaul

Wonder if we could flip Pettersson to Vancouver I heard somewhere they were interested in him.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 10:37 p.m.

Thread: 2nd Round Bound

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sharks_1999</b></div><div>no chance lol</div></div>

I dunno it's not that bad. No way SJ adds the pick here but Kerfoot did hit 51 points last season which would be good for our depth. That would be the 4th highest scorer on the team. Would probably rather just do Reimer for a 2nd rounder though.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 3:44 p.m.

Thread: 2nd Round Bound

You know what maybe

Forum: Armchair-GMTue. at 1:47 a.m.

Thread: BIg Willie Stylez

Can't see Toronto being thrilled with that offer. I'd ask for at least double that if I were trying to move Nylander.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 9:15 p.m.

Thread: Burns and Benn Trade

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>VezinaOtter</b></div><div>I'd say the Sharks decline on the contract alone. Burns is cheaper, but still more productive than Benn. Also, there no way Benn is going to agree to leave Dallas.</div></div>

Yeah it would be tough to convince Benn to leave. Does he have a full NMC?

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 7:45 p.m.

Thread: Burns and Benn Trade

Sharks decline. Burns is older but he's also better and cheaper.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsMon. at 6:23 p.m.

Thread: Crazy idear

Crazy is certainly one of the things I’d call it…

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 6:18 p.m.

Thread: A Leafs team I would cheer for

No clue what’s happening here but Sharks accept.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 6:16 p.m.

Thread: Its Been A Good Run

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ItsTheCracken</b></div><div>They're not retaining 6, they're retaining 2.</div></div>

I was saying total.

$2M x 3 years = $6M

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 4:57 p.m.

Thread: Better next year

Karlsson waiving is iffy but does Seguin?

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 4:45 p.m.

Thread: Its Been A Good Run

If the Sharks are giving you a positive value player <em>and</em> retaining $6 million on said player, they aren’t gonna be adding more value the other way.

Forum: Armchair-GMSun. at 6:41 p.m.

Thread: Oilers Offseason

yeah foegele doesn't provide us with anything we don't already have so sharks decline

Forum: Armchair-GMSun. at 4:46 a.m.

Thread: Leaf Tinkering

Sharks decline. Robertson is more or less the cost to dump Mrazek alone. That leaves it at Valimaki for Reimer and Balcers which doesn't check out at all.

Forum: Armchair-GMSun. at 4:45 a.m.

Thread: 2023

id do it if the 5th was going the other direction...

and then it magically turned into a 1st

Forum: Armchair-GMSun. at 1:50 a.m.

Thread: How do you even fix this team

take out the 2nd and maybe

Page 1

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyForum RulesAboutCBA FAQContact Us

Follow @CapFriendly

© 2022 CapFriendly.com

×