SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Habsdave

Member Since
Jun. 27, 2018
Favourite Team
Montreal Canadiens
2nd Favourite Team
Winnipeg Jets
Forum Posts
38
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 5, 2021 at 5:32 p.m.
Thread: Necas
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>Montreal lost Weber, Kotkaniemi and Danault. Carolina added Bear, Cole, Kotkaniemi, Andersen, Raanta, DeAngelo, Leivo, Stepan... there's a LOT of improvements on this Canes roster. Hamilton was let go because his deal is going to be an anchor almost as soon as the puck drops this season. Carolina have MAJORLY improved almost everywhere. Montreal still are weak down the middle.</div></div>

None of the players that carolina took on are difference makers. Hamilton's production accounts for almost all of these guys production added up. Andersen couldn't keep up a .900 average with a defense that is of similar quality as carolina's and raanta's 905 is also under Reimer's 906 so wouldn't call those upgrades. I would also question the judgement of someone that brings a guy like DeAngelo in a locker room full of kids. I would've passed on that, no matter how low the price tag was. Montreal's center line is going to be better than last year's, Danault is going to stop taking Evan's ice time (who is faster and more skilled). Weber is not lost, he's on the LTIR where is highest value is for the cap space he provides. Most discussions about him last year were about how slow he was and how he should be pushed to retire. What we have now is better than a retired weber, he's a cap boosting weber. In the end we'll only see what the result is once the season start but my feeling is that the right pieces are now in the right slots and the underachieving centers issue we had have been handled. As to the "who would want to sign in montreal" point you are trying to make, I'd just say Carolina doesn't have anything very bright to show in that sector either, nothing matching montreal's recent UFA signings anyways (toffoli, chiarot, savard, hoffman).
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 5, 2021 at 4:18 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 4, 2021 at 7:58 p.m.
Thread: Necas
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 4, 2021 at 6:57 p.m.
Thread: Necas
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 29, 2021 at 9:51 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>coga16</b></div><div>so Kotkaniemi is a bad players bc your coach didnt know how to use him and your GM filled your roster with bottom 6 bad skating wingers. Make sense</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>coga16</b></div><div>so Kotkaniemi is a bad players bc your coach didnt know how to use him and your GM filled your roster with bottom 6 bad skating wingers. Make sense</div></div>

Kotkaniemi was given all the opportunities to play with every single player on the team. Suzuki delivered twice as much as Kotkaniemi in these same conditions, starting on the 4th line and working his way up. So does that make Suzuki an insanely good superstar or is Kotkaniemi just average? Suzuki is good but he's no Mc David so comparing apples with apples, Kotkaniemi is producing half as much as suzuki. Players that can dominate will always find a way to do it no matter what the conditions are. Another example, Corey Perry scored more points at 36 years old from the 4th line in less games than Kotkaniemi who was tried time and time again with the best we had. At 6 Millions I expect someone that can dominate. If you need to be handed wingers that already dominate on their own to produce, anyone can do your job. You want people to make sense, start by making some sense yourself, you blame the coach but we had 2 different coaches during KK's stay in MTL. How many coaches do you need to fire before the we start looking at the player for a reason for the poor production. Another example? Danault who's a defensive center also had more points than KK with 1 tenth of KK's powerplay time. Believe what you want but in the end, numbers speak for themselves, so replace the 10th scorer on your team (KK) with anyone else and no one is going to have any sorts of expectations for that replacement, so why not try Poehling who has the same point per game pace that KK had in the AHL but 5.35 millions cheaper. Anyways, you keep KK and you're screwed, 5% increase in salary next year (to a total of 6.4 millions), at that rate, what is Suzuki going to be expecting? 12 millions? We won't even have the cap space to even pay market value for Suzuki if we start paying 60 points money to a 30 points player. You have to know when to cut your losses.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 29, 2021 at 12:47 a.m.