Hckeydude123

Member Since

Nov. 9, 2022

Favourite Team

Los Angeles Kings

2nd Favourite Team

Boston Bruins

Forum Posts

324

Posts per Day

1.5

Forum: Armchair-GM16 hours ago

Thread: What is the cost of the price

At very best Edmundson is worth a 3rd with 50% retained. No one would want him unless 50% is retained and wont get more than a only a 3rd.

Forum: Armchair-GM18 hours ago

Thread: Ryan Graves is going to get PAAIIDDDD

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LPProductions</b></div><div>Fact that it is only 2 years is huge for the Kings. I think it's a really solid deal for LA</div></div>

You're right about that. The term is the biggest positive of the signing, if this had been a 5/6/7 year deal it would be absolutely crippling to the Kings future coming up. But at the end of the day Graves would have been just as good of an option that they could have signed for term and lower dollar amount.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 2:58 p.m.

Thread: Could it be

If Gavy resigns you can say goodbye to Durzi, Blake isn't gonna make all these moves to have Gavy playing on the third pairing. That being said Durzi would be a waste to be on the third pairing so I think he'll be traded if the resigning takes place.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu. at 7:56 p.m.

Thread: Treliever

Not a chance you could get a 2nd and Iafallo for Brodie. Kings decline.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu. at 2:10 p.m.

Thread: Day 4 pt 2 tka-fuccd

Kings say no thanks. Not giving up all that for a guy who has had 1 decent in the NHL as a backup and 2 terrible seasons as a back up.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu. at 12:39 p.m.

Thread: Jack Hughes

Obviously this is completely unrealistic. But man I would be SOOOO excited to go to games to see Hughes hit the ice and do his thing with the next line to come out with Fiala would be very exciting to watch.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 26 at 1:03 p.m.

Thread: Retool

Kings don't have enough cap space to do that even if they wanted to, which they wouldn't want to do. They have 7.5m in cap so even with Durzi thrown in that's only 9.2 in cap they would have to add another 1.3m in cap to the trade just to make it work. If they did all that they wouldn't have any cap to fix the obvious problems they currently have so this is an all around bad trade for the Kings.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsMay 25 at 2:43 p.m.

Thread: kings big improvements

HAHAHAHA this is laughable.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 25 at 1:38 p.m.

Thread: Wings

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>IDKtbh</b></div><div>I think you’re a little off on your values, boss. Arvidsson was acquired for a 2nd & 3rd round pick two years ago and it would be a little naive to expect his value to have increased since then. If anything his value has decreased in the last 2 years.

And our 3rd best defensive prospect would be the top defensive prospect on 30% of NHL teams prospect pools. Edvinsson is the #2 ranked overall prospect in the entire league and Wallinder is the 21st ranked overall prospect.</div></div>

https://www.eliteprospects.com/ranking-portal/aba2205d-8abc-4280-9a13-84d79feec324/top-100-prospects-in-the-nhl

I may have just missed him but I don't see your boy on here at all. If he isn't able to crack the top 100 I'm not saying he is bad but his value definitely isn't what you think it is.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 25 at 12:35 p.m.

Thread: Wings

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>IDKtbh</b></div><div>Johannsen is our 3rd best D prospect after Edvinsson & Wallinder, I think that’s an even trade that I wouldn’t even do.</div></div>

What's your point? He might be YOUR 3rd best defensive prospect but he isn't worth a 60 point reliable winger or a 40 point versatile defensemen. Both Arvy and Durzi would sell for two 2nds each so you might be able to get one of those guys at that price but certainly not both.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 24 at 7:04 p.m.

Thread: Wings

Not enough for both Arvy and Durzi. Kings decline that quickly.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 24 at 6:59 p.m.

Thread: Wouldnt mind this

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dekes</b></div><div>Korpi is no where close to ullmarks level. You have a shot at getting a great starter and you are gonna pass, that’s fine eve like Edmonton all offence no defence no goaltending.

Korpi isn’t the guy to get the job done</div></div>

They both played 6 games in the playoffs with almost the exact same save% and GAA. I'd say Ullmark played behind a much better defensive team as well. Ullmark allowed 25 goals in his 6 games and Korpi allowed 26 games in his 6 games. So how are they much different?

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 24 at 6:32 p.m.

Thread: Canucks 23-24

Personally I like Podkolzin but not at that price. Unless we are talking an AHL player like Anderson or MAYBE JAD then talks would quickly stop. Podkolzin MIGHT be able to make it on the 4th line at best and Grans probably wont ever make the line up on the right side but Grans has more value on the market than Podkolzin.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 24 at 6:27 p.m.

Thread: MCR22

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dekes</b></div><div>If Boston takes on Peterson you are gonna be paying a lot more then just a 1st and a 2nd. Make that 2 1sts+ turcotte or something</div></div>

Which is exactly why Boston is a bad suiter for any trades with LA. If the Kings did want Ullmark, Petersen would have to be part of it and Boston would want too much to make that happen. Doesn't work for either team.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 24 at 6:24 p.m.

Thread: Wouldnt mind this

Kings say no thanks. Could lock down Korpi for less and get more from a Durzi+2nd trade.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 24 at 12:01 p.m.

Thread: AM TK LGRW

Thats not enough for Roy. Kings decline.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 20 at 5:47 p.m.

Thread: Post Season

That's a tough one for the Kings, its good in the sense that it would help them now but could turn out to be bad considering Bjornfot is towards the end of his development and almost NHL ready. So idk how the Kings would decides this one. Good thinking on this one.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 20 at 5:42 p.m.

Thread: Avs 2023-24

Kings arent trading Arvy to upgrade a mid 2nd round pick to a late 1st. If anything it will be for future assets or something that will help now. A late 1st does nothing for the Kings.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 19 at 4:14 p.m.

Thread: IM THE LEAFS NEW GM

As your first trade as the new GM of the Leafs the Kings say no thanks.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 19 at 2:18 p.m.

Thread: Caps

Kings top 9 are not being altered in anyway shape or form. No room for Kuzy and his 8m cap hit so no thank you.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 19 at 11:50 a.m.

Thread: Does this make sense

Extreme over payment for Eddy. At very best he will get a one 3rd in return for 50% retained.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 19 at 11:48 a.m.

Thread: The Blueprint

Kings say no thanks. That trade creates more problems for us then solves problems.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsMay 18 at 7:25 p.m.

Thread: W for all teams

Absolutely zero interest in doing this for the Kings. Swapping bad goalies with the same cap hit and giving away a bottom pairing defensemen and a potential 2c or 3c youngster? If the Kings get rid of Petersen it will be to create cap space, Walker can be moved out on his own for a 4th possibly a third so this trade makes zero sense for the Kings.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 18 at 6:37 p.m.

Thread: is this ideal

As a Kings fan thats WAYYY over priced for Kaliyev but we will take it! lol

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 18 at 5:21 p.m.

Thread: 1234

As a Kings fan when the Kings traded Quick it was a tough pill to swallow however it was an understandable trade. Trading Drew for Tavares makes literally no sense at all. If we didn't have Kopi and the pizza man then it would be understandable trade, wouldn't like it but it would be understandable.

12 Next

Page 1

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

Hckeydude123

Member Since

Favourite Team

2nd Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day