DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
Hullsy09
Member Since
May 18, 2022
Favourite Team
Pittsburgh Penguins
2nd Favourite Team
Detroit Red Wings
Forum Posts
2756
Posts per Day
5.5
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 10 at 4:28 p.m.
Thread:
kane
Ew
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 10 at 3:29 p.m.
Thread:
23-24 outlook
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>futurebobmckenzie</b></div><div>I have them overachieving this year, it’s a hot take, I know, but I feel that everything can and will go right for them. Like I said it’s a hot take🤷♂️</div></div>
Hey I like their team and I think they could be pesky, just not better than the pens.
What do you think will happen that will have them do that well? Fantilli calder season? Major merzlinkins bounce back?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 10 at 3:24 p.m.
Thread:
23-24 outlook
Your realistic option has Columbus ahead of Pitt?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 10 at 3:17 p.m.
Thread:
Put a bow on it
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pensfan21</b></div><div>Agree completely on your first point. Would be really interesting to see Yager there too. I don't think he's as far off as some people say he is and he looked really really good at the prospect camp. Like miles above everyone else (many of whom are supposedly close to ready). And who better to play and learn from than Crosby. Don't think it would hurt his development.
I think Pitlick and Hinostoza both have pretty good speed. Yager probably the fastest. Poulin I was impressed with him in the limited time he had last year. Wouldn't say speed is his mo, but I thought he was the most noticeable out of all the WBS guys called up last year. Puustinen is also very fast and I thought he looked good. But Poulin I think showed the most offensive potential and playmaking out of the WBS guys. I know it was only his debut with the Pens but 2 points in 9 games for Nylander was not ideal. Especially when on a line with Malkin. I think there will be other players that step up to that role first, but I also don't want to judge Nylander too fast. Hopefully he has a good camp.</div></div>
Agree with what you said. I agree production wasn’t there for nylander but I thought he drove play well. Will be interesting to see how it all plays out
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 10 at 2:55 p.m.
Thread:
Award Winners
Form: favourite, medium favourite, long shot
Hart- McDavid (+120), pettersson (+5500), Crosby (+12000)
Richard- Matthews ( +300), Kaprizov (+3000), debrincat (+8000)
Calder- bedard (-120), Cooley(+1500), kulich (+8000)
Norris- Q Hughes (+800), Karlsson (+1300), Theodore
(+10000)
Selke- Hischier, Pettersson, idk
Vezina- Vasy, (+600), Gustafson (+1800), demko (+2300)
Forum:
Mock-Draft
Aug. 10 at 2:35 p.m.
Thread:
Draft Grades
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AStovetop</b></div><div>Playing on the second line and Being a 2nd line winger are two different things IMO. His production and play style is very much that of a scoring 3rd liner. I think there's a lot of teams where his not in the top 6</div></div>
https://twitter.com/arhockeystats/status/1681469414074449921?s=46&t=6EdMZaFL2dVoFIHertXbfQ
Forum:
Mock-Draft
Aug. 10 at 1:01 p.m.
Thread:
Draft Grades
Too tough on kaako fs. He’s already a 2nd line winger
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 10 at 1:00 p.m.
Thread:
Put a bow on it
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pensfan21</b></div><div>I like the Jones signing. I would also try and sign Suter depending on what's going on there. The only thing is I'm not sure Nylander brings enough offense to the top 6. I think he's a good player I just don't know his style fits the system well. Speed isn't his strong suit and wasn't great at finishing in the small sample size we got last year. Definitely he deserves a shot in camp and I like the idea of putting someone like that in the top 6. I think Poulin Pitlick and Hinostrozza would be good contenders there.</div></div>
Yeah I think Pitlick should start on the Crosby line while guentz is out. I would even like to see Yager play a few games there for a little test drive before going back to junior, who knows maybe he is impressive and sticks around
I think we can all agree that Crosby, guentzel, Rakell, smith, geno, rust, eller are 7/9 top forwards, now we just have to determine who the other 2 are and where they can play. Preferably whoever, out of the long list of hopefuls, can find some chemistry with Sid or Geno can play in the top 6.
I see you mentioned nylander is lacking in speed and I’m not disagreeing with you, but who, out of the list of hopefuls, is fast? I would say it’s Johnsson, Pitlick, Hinostoza, Yager, Poulin, puustinen, nylander, Carter, competing for those 2 spots. I’m not super familiar with some of these guys, but most of them are not exactly burners, to my knowledge
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 10 at 11:31 a.m.
Thread:
ARI uses its last buyout
Carter is not waiving his NMC
How are we still doing this
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 10 at 10:49 a.m.
Thread:
Not Done Yet
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SHOWTIME_TTV</b></div><div>He can waive.
You are correct. IDK why I thought ANA had an Arb buyout window.</div></div>
He can waive, but he won’t
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 10 at 10:45 a.m.
Thread:
Not Done Yet
Carter has a NMC so we cannot trade him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 10 at 8:55 a.m.
Thread:
A 3C PTO Candidate
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>The_Lanny</b></div><div>Recipe for a decade of sucking.</div></div>
Really ironic that it’s a flames fan saying this
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 10 at 8:52 a.m.
Thread:
Win now
Wings are unlikely to trade ras. If they did, they would probably need a sweeter return than that.
But if they did, more importantly, why would we keep carter at 3C if we got ras?? Ras allows you to stick Carter on the bench. This would be like last year if we traded for chychrun but still played Dumo LD1.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 10 at 5:28 p.m.
Thread:
Swayman
No team is trading with a team who just offer sheeted them
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 10 at 10:01 a.m.
Thread:
Question for caniacs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ecupirate07</b></div><div>We’ll likely run a 1A/1B situation next year with Kochetkov and another goalie</div></div>
That was my guess, Kochetkov seems to be the plan for the future and Carolina doesn’t seem to be the team to dump a bunch of money into an shining Freddy Anderson
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 7 at 1:26 p.m.
Thread:
Locking up Petey and Hronek
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DefenseFirst</b></div><div>Given that its a couple years down the road, and the cap is projected to jump big time, i think that is really light for Pettersson.
Think that hronek contract would age poorly.</div></div>
Agreed. This is probably what EP gets if he signs today
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 7 at 1:23 p.m.
Thread:
Can it work
Nedelkovich is genuinely bad, this would be a major mistake
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 6 at 11:34 p.m.
Thread:
My Team Canada
Crosby on the 4th line with nuge on the 1st???
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 6 at 9:06 p.m.
Thread:
Slicing into the core
Does not work cap wise for Pitt. You would have to take back Desmith for starters
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 3 at 7:31 p.m.
Thread:
March Of The Penguins
A lot of people think Granny will end up 2RW. He has prior chemistry with zucker, and him on that line gives it a perfect composition:
Zucker (puck retrievals) - Geno (star/goalscorer) - Granny (puck distributor)
This would push rust to the third line which would distribute our skill throughout our lineup a bit better, plus rust’s skill set is a bit more of a third line style compared to Granny
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 2 at 4:49 p.m.
Thread:
My take on the trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JSEB93</b></div><div>1) Dude - right
2) From what I saw it sounded like they juts didn't want to retain. Could be wrong though. Feel like if Hextall really wanted him though it wouldn't take too much more to convince ARI to drop like 5 picks in the draft.
3) True, he did. Is it an actual fact he would go nowhere else though? Could be
4) Oof - not sure I can agree Engvall sucks. He's exactly what they need on that 3rd line - and fits way better than Granlund in my opinion. There's no defense on that 3rd line - and Granlund just makes that worse. If Sullivan gave the 3rd line 50% ozone starts I might change my mind - but he seems too stubborn to do that.
5) Didn't they just give up a recent prospect? It would be like us giving up Poulin or something like that? Easy yes. Plus I wouldn't mind paying more. I would have like to have spent a ton on trades - I'm not really worried about giving up picks and prospects right now. That's exactly what I want to be doing. In regards to Barb vs Gran - I'll take the guy that's 3mil cheaper and only signed for this year.
6) Nino went quick but I'm not sure I can give them a pass just because they were looking at better players.
7) Yeah - ROR wasn't cheap. I just wish those were the moves they made ya know? Like go all in or do nothing - not this weird half assed middle ground they did where they didn't get a significant upgrade but also didn't save any money.
8) True - it could have been.
In my opinion if they were willing to move Rust down I would have just kept Kapanen and put him at 2RW - and then use the extra money elsewhere like a 3C. Domi, Bjugstad, etc. Although Domi's complete lack of defense scares the **** out of me as a 3C. If they could have gotten half retention my view about the trade would be significantly different for sure. The 5mil for 3 years is killing me</div></div>
You make some good points. What i keep coming back to is that people didn’t like the rakell signing at first and that has worked out very well. Hextall, despite ****ing up everything else, has gone 2/2 on deadline trades so far. Hopefully it works out better than we expect. At the end of the day if this team wins anything in the playoffs it’s going to be because of Crosby - I will never count us out of a playoff series as long as we have him
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 2 at 4:24 p.m.
Thread:
My take on the trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JSEB93</b></div><div>*THERE'S NO RULES* - hopefully you get the reference or this is awkward. So below are some options that I think would have been better. I think we could have afforded all of these options based on cap hit and/or assets given up.
1) Bertuzzi goes for a 1st and a 4th - half retained. He's also a UFA. So better player, lower cap hit, and you can let him walk in the offseason if need be.
2) Chychrun goes for a 1st, 2nd and 2nd. Could have easily added Bjugstad for a 3rd or 4th. Improve the 3C and get a top pair Dman for this year and 2 more.
3) Rangers get Patrick Kane for 2.5mil for a 2nd, 3rd and 4th. Better player, and cheaper. Also UFA at end of the season so can let him walk.
4) Islanders get Engvall for a 3rd. This one really bothers me. Perfect fit for what the Pens need at 3C. Only making 2.5mil. And a UFA at the end of the season.
5) Vegas gets Barbashev for a prospect in the QMJHL. I don't think he's really any better than Granlund, but he's only making 2.25mil and is a pending UFA
6) Winnipeg gets Niederreiter from the exact same team for the same round pick. Better contract - and in my opinion better player that would be a bigger help to the team
7) TOR got ROR for basically a 1st, 2nd, 4th. He fits exactly what the Pens needed
8) Possible Tarasenko depending on his NTC
9) Maybe most importantly, do nothing. If Granlund is your only move, this team isn't goig to be competitive. So why waste the cap space and assets to get him?
I'm sure there's more that I'm missing but I'll stick with that for now</div></div>
1. Bertuzzi would have been awesome
2. https://twitter.com/craigsmorgan/status/1631084053184278528?s=46&t=6EdMZaFL2dVoFIHertXbfQ
Sounds like coyotes were looking for the highest pick they could get.
3. Kane had a full NMC and was only willing to go to rangers
4.Engvall just kinda sucks imo - I’d rather have granlund
5. Barbashev would have been decent for sure. They paid a bit more than we did for granlund but he’s half the salary cap so it evens out. Granlund better offensively, barbashev better energy/physical guy. Take your pick
6. Nino would have been great but he was traded before the pens were out on better players, so you can’t really fault them on that yk. Also seems like Nino went immediately after poile made it known they were selling - jets acted very quick
7. ROR very good player for sure. Big price to pay but worth it.
8. I think NYR was Tarasenko preference.
I like the idea of playing granlund on Malkins rw, sliding rust down, and going after a cheap but solid 3C (maybe max domi). I would have coughed up the extra 3rd and gotten detention on granlund to make that happen
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 2 at 2:26 p.m.
Thread:
My take on the trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JSEB93</b></div><div>That's a difficult question to answer. Am I allowed to pick players that were traded earlier in the season? Or can I only pick ones who were available when the Granlund trade happened?
Hextall needed to make improvements to the team to make them competitive, or keep cap space. He somehow did neither</div></div>
You can pick anyone you’d like, there are no rules here
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 2 at 11:33 a.m.
Thread:
My take on the trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JSEB93</b></div><div>"With retention" that's a giant with though. There was no retention and he's signed for 2 more years. That's terrible. A player with no physicality, no defense, bad forechecking and limited scoring touch is exactly what this 3rd line didn't need. That's basically Jeff Carter that can skate better.
Add to that his contract with no retention and term, and look at what else they could have gotten, and it's easy to see it's a nightmare of a trade.</div></div>
Who would you have gone for instead?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 2 at 7:53 a.m.
Thread:
My take on the trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Pensfan303</b></div><div>I think Granlund is best suited on Geno's or Sid's wing with his great playmaking ability. that would allow Rust to slide to the 3rd line which his skill set is perfect for and hes would add a goal scoring touch to the bottom 6</div></div>
It makes sense. We will have to see how it plays out
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2023 CapFriendly.com