SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

JKTakes

TexasHockey
Member Since
Nov. 10, 2017
Favourite Team
Dallas Stars
2nd Favourite Team
Toronto Maple Leafs
Forum Posts
67
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 11, 2022 at 4:22 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 9, 2022 at 11:17 a.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Francez</b></div><div>Suter isn’t the problem with re-signing Klingberg at all. It’s the fact that they don’t wanna commit 7.5-8 million a year to a player who will be 38 if they give him the 8 year deal. Not only that but Klingberg was awful in the playoffs. That could be a sign of things to come. You don’t wanna take that risk after already messing up the Benn contract, and Seguin unfortunately not living up to his with injuries

I get y’all wanna keep him because he was drafted and developed by the Stars and he’s a fan favourite, but signing him for big money and big term is a huge disaster waiting to happen.

You can’t blame Suters money as being a problem when you have a goalie who isn’t even gonna be on the NHL roster making nearly equal money, a 4th line Center also making equal money, and the captain who will likely peak out at 50-60 points making 9.5 mil. If they wanted to sign Klingberg they would. It just doesn’t make sense to do so</div></div>

Listen, if Klingberg signs 7x7 deal with Seattle or Carolina, I'm definitely blaming Suter's money for it. That's completely reasonable deal for a RHD like him and he will be almost 37 by the end of it, exactly what Suter is now and what Letang will be in 2 years, so chances are, still potentially serviceable at that point and the cap will be over 100M in 2029.

Also, I've been advocating for moving Khudobin for the longest time here, I've written full article about it.
https://jurajkralik.substack.com/p/after-ben-bishop-stars-should-now?r=1h681h&amp;s=w&amp;utm_campaign=post&amp;utm_medium=web
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 27, 2022 at 8:14 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 14, 2022 at 9:01 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 14, 2022 at 8:58 a.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TheMooterus</b></div><div>- Oettinger gets more money
- Either give Robertson a 3-year deal, 4-year deal, or an 8-year deal. Anything else is bad for Robertson or for Dallas
- Klingberg is going to want about $1M more than what you've got offered here

Easy fix to all of this:

- Don't sign Raffl (don't need him when Dellandrea/Studenic can fill his role for $400K less)
- Pay someone to take Faksa's entire contract.</div></div>

I think Oettinger knows Dallas and Jeff Reese is a great place for him to be and signing for 3.75M is actually a total comparable with Andrei Vasilevskiy bridge deal back in 2016. I know the cap is higher now but we have post-covid flat cap environment as well, so it balances out. We'll see what the number will be.

I'm actually on board with bridging both Oettinger and Robertson for 3 years and I see your point of signing him for that or 8 years. I just think with agents and all, they know that too and good compromise is signing him to 6 or 7 year deal, where he can be a UFA being 28 or 29 years old. That way you can actually save on cap instead of bridging him and then offering 10+ in 2025 or pushing to 8 year deal. The best case scenario is 8x8 contract, bottom line.

I think it's much easier to trade Khudobin than Faksa, that's why I did that and with Faksa, you get at least SOME return for your investment instead of NONE in Khudobin's case.
I'm also not on board re-signing Raffl, it was just an example of signing old UFA, because I had 1.2M in cap space and 22-man roster and we all know how Nill loves to do that.

Klingberg honestly isn't getting 8M, not even in an open market. Evolving Hockey has his most probable contract projection at 6.9M for 6 more years. 7x7 is just FAIR compromise from him AND the team.
Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 28, 2019 at 7:52 a.m.