SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Jameshgfgn

The commissioner
Member Since
Feb. 11, 2020
Forum Posts
945
Posts per Day
0.6
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 15, 2021 at 2:52 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 10, 2021 at 11:21 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 9, 2021 at 11:15 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 6, 2021 at 4:52 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BoeserSZNMNBoy</b></div><div>Kerfoot playing a few games there due to John Tavaris injury doesn't mean much

Again, freedom of speech exist for a reason. Didn't know people aren't/ can't criticize Kerfoot when most of leafs fans criticize, &amp; bash him daily

If you want to say kerfoot can be a top 6c, then so can Hartman, &amp; Rask. Right?

Didn't know hockey was a 1 person sports. Joel Eriksson Ek has been playing with Marcus foligno, &amp; Joel Eriksson Ek so your argument about kerfoot needing good W rendered your argument meaningless

Toronto can keep kerfoot then. Minnesota doesn't want him</div></div>

oh you know it's a banger when someone randomly brings freedom of speech into a hockey talk for some weird ass reason, especially when they dont use it correctly.
Now, on to Kerfoot. I never made an argument that kerfoot is a top 6 C. Just pointed out that he has shown some capacity to play as one. He has also shown a much larger sample size of being able to play the wing in the top 6, and even do good work on a top line from time to time. So that cements him as at worst, a decent option as a top 6 player.
I dont care about Hartman and Rask since we arnt talking about them, we're talking about Kerfoot, I also know how good Eriksson Ek is, i was simply using him to point out how terrible your thing about Kerfoot only having 43 points and that means he isnt a top 6 player thing was.

I also dont care if Minnesota wants him, the leafs need him more than they need a 2nd rounder.