SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Jdp

VegasGMV2.LeafsGMV1
Member Since
Jan. 6, 2017
Favourite Team
Toronto Maple Leafs
Forum Posts
1918
Posts per Day
0.7
Forum: GM Game 2017-18Oct. 31, 2017 at 1:10 p.m.
Forum: GM Game 2017-18Oct. 31, 2017 at 2:16 a.m.
Forum: GM Game 2017-18Oct. 20, 2017 at 8:59 p.m.
Forum: GM Game 2017-18Oct. 19, 2017 at 6:01 p.m.
Forum: GM Game 2017-18Oct. 19, 2017 at 1:40 a.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DavidBooth7</b></div><div>The BOE has also been delaying the inactivity looming in Calgary, the need for a 3rd BOE member, among items.

It's been 2 weeks now since Thornton was last on? I understand phillyjabroni says that he was active every 5 days in v1 constantly, but we're past 5 days now. Calgary needs a new GM. First, where will the GM come from. Would the BOE consider giving Taboo another chance given he's next in line on the seniority list? Or perhaps plNHL who seems to want a job again? If those two are ruled as not ideal (read between the lines there), where does the new GM come from? Jacketsman? Edmonton AGM? Doctor Breakfast? At this point, even if you wanted to kick Thornton out, his replacement isn't ready, which is why the BOE needs to deal with that <em>now</em>.

As for Thornton, I have nothing against him. But 2 weeks of inactivity, where's the line being drawn? How much longer is the BOE wanting to stretch this? Don't you have to at some point say, it's for the betterment to keep things running smoothly by adding the new GM already? Honestly if it was up to me, he woulda be gone by a week ago. But things don't go well when I'm in charge, as we've learnt in the past :cry :laugh

As for the 3rd BOE member, do the current members have anyone in mind? Without the 3rd, it'll be impossible for the BOE to decide on stuff through voting and it'd become problematic. I'd think it's better to have a current GM, if they wish, forfeit their team and join the BOE, as only one of us would have league knowledge, understand the rules already, and be able to make simple connections between stuff that an outsider wouldn't. Perhaps the BOE should pop this question by 5-10 GMs who they'd trust to do this? <strong>Heads up, there's zero chance I'm considering joining the crap show before anyone asks</strong> :laugh</div></div>

Who'd ask?
Forum: NHLOct. 15, 2017 at 3:03 p.m.