Jimbo1119

Jimbo1119
Member Since
May 9, 2019
Favourite Team
New York Rangers
Forum Posts
354
Posts per Day
0.78
Forum Threads
29
Forum: Armchair-GMMar 14 at 10:04
Thread: Lias Smith dump n Koivu
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DoubleADoubleK</b></div><div>200 better options than Smith and his still inflated salary and cap even after bonus, dreamland thinking. Let alone for a 4th. Maybe With a 2nd, which is what Lias is. Therefore would rather trade Lias than a 2nd. Lias becoming an invaluable
grinder is also dreamy</div></div>

If they gotta add assets to move Smith- then they are better off riding his contract out- wouldn’t kill them for him to be 6D or 7D....just no more at wing!!

Lias is very tricky- might be wishful thinking for him to become useful- but unless they are trading for a pick they like on their draft board or he’s part of a package for a pick or player they really want- I wouldn’t move him- especially as a throw in to move Smith....if they can’t get value for him- then why not give him a real chance at 4C- with real minutes and NHL line mates?
Forum: Armchair-GMMar 11 at 5:54
Thread: Watch This Team Grow
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KakkoForMauriceRichardAward</b></div><div>Dude, Claesson sucked for us last season and we have Miller, Rykov and Hajek coming up! Play one of the kids!

Fast can be resigned, if you don't make a few mistakes here: Strome is worth 4 mil MAX, if he wants 4,5 mil or more, then trade him for a pick or two and sign a cheaper for the PK. Also, Hank will likely retire so you can just put his whole contract on LTIR. If not, terminate his deal altogether. With that, Fast can be easily resigned... 3 years, 2,75 mil AAV.

Lemieux is worth slightly more than that, I'd argue that he'll get paid 3 years at 1,75 mil per.

Lias is a tough one. If he wants to come back ans try to become a good bottom six defensive forward he's more than welcomed to, however it's likely we move him in a package deal.</div></div>

If Hajek, Miller or Rykov are NHL ready- I would certainly play them over Claesson ...my point here was not to endorse Claesson- but to sign him or another cheap LD option to keep roster filled- and avoid playing Staal- until the young guys are ready....don't want to rush any of them- I believe Hajek was close to (if not ) the worst statistical Dman before he got hurt this year...and Rykov is supposedly behind him.

As far as Hank's retirement- correct me if I am wrong- but I believe even if he retires the team is hit with 3M cap recapture...in any case- I do like Fast- but RW gets pretty crowded- with Krav hopefully coming up....something has to give- and unfortunately I see that as Fast going.

Lemiuex has had a rough season since his injury- I belirve enough to suppress what they will pay...but I wont argue too much 1.25 vs 1.75M....do think he has a place on this team going forward for the $ both of us are talking.

Lias- good chance he will never see NY in a Ranger jersey...I would just like to see him get another shot. He will never live up to what we want a #7 pick to be...but there is still a lot of value in him as an ultra competitive bottom 6 grinder- a puck hound who other players hate to play against. As far as moving him- I feel he has such little value right now that it would be a better situation to sit on him (or how about give another chance?) rather than trade him at bottom value- only to see him emerge as a valuable mid 6 presence on another team.
Forum: Armchair-GMMar 9 at 6:16
Thread: Keep the rebuild goin
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Nikolay_Zherdev</b></div><div>I definitely agree but I also feel like Lias hockey IQ wasn’t the best either and he is an north south player that pretty much played a dump and chase type game whereas it feels like while geekie might be similar in the thing u said his hockey IQ looks to be a bit better</div></div>

Could be wrong here- but I thought Lias’ Hockey IQ was a strength- one of the problems with evaluating him from this year is that he was given so few minutes- and when he played it was with guys like Smith and Haley.

He did himself no favors- but what is head scratching is that you would think his aggressive/hard on the puck/north-south style would make him the apple of DQ’s eye....but so not the case!
Forum: Armchair-GMMar 9 at 10:09
Thread: Keep the rebuild goin
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Nikolay_Zherdev</b></div><div>I agree just felt as though Georgiev gonna garner a 2nd plus and I don’t think it’s gonna be a really good prospect coming back with that which is why I made it geekie ready doesn’t matter who it is just a center that’s ready to contribute and it makes it better if he had already played with gauthier</div></div>

I don't know if Carolina has any top tier prospects- but they are loaded with 2nd and 3rd tier prospects....I am not familiar with the particular development of any of these guys other than the prospect reports which come out- so I don't know haw the Canes themselves value any one in particular...my point, though, is that since Lias' foot speed has been problematic in his development- I would be very hesitant- and would do extra diligence on another prospect with the same limitation. Keep in mind- there are many NHLers who have overcome this limitation- and in that regard I still haven't given up on Lias.
Forum: Armchair-GMMar 9 at 9:30
Thread: Keep the rebuild goin
With 2 goals and an assist in his 1st game- tough to find fault with Geekie...but scouting reports on him do indicate that he is not a slow skater- just slow out of the hole...he does have a good skill set- but the "slow out of the hole" thing is what has plagued Lias- and contributed to that disaster...so I would look to avoid prospects like that. The Canes prospect I would push for is Rees.

As far as the Vegas trade- I don't think they will trade Krebs....but that is the type/level of prospect I would need to see in any trade involving ADA. ADA is a blossoming star- who still has a few levels of improvement in his defense yet to come...so unless the Rangers were to get back a prospect with a sky high ceiling (good luck getting other teams to move these types of prospects) I am not interested in moving him- other than to the left side across from Trouba, Fox, or Nils.
Forum: Armchair-GMMar 9 at 9:08
Thread: Rangers would you do this in the offseason
I would not make that trade. The way ADA drives offense- all the while paired up with one of, if not the worst LD in the league- I'm not looking to trade him at all. ADA still requires improvement in his own end- but with his talent and skillset- I'm sure in a better defensive scheme (Rangers D plan is, BTW, atrocious) he would take his D game up a few levels.

That I am not looking to trade him- a team would have to give an offer I couldn't turn away. In the package mentioned the only piece of interest would be Madden....to get me listening I would want to hear one of Turcotte, Kaliyev, or Fagemo included in a package...I'm sure these guys are non starters for the Kings....but any team that wants to add a cost controlled RD, who has broken out offensively and whose defensive game probably has big upside- is going to have to pay.
Forum: Armchair-GMMar 9 at 8:52
Thread: Rangers Biggest Hole 2C
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Mike_Gartner</b></div><div>Bridge Strome. Chytil, Andersson, Barron or Henriksson become 2C in 2 years.</div></div>

With Strome- if his contract fits into the salary structure w/o putting up a long term roadblock to developing players- he's almost a no brainer for a temp 2C because you know what he is. Chytl is the guy we all hope emerges as 2C- but that can't be rushed. The remaining guys mentioned (hope Lias gets another chance) are probably more suited to the bottom 6...of course more time is needed to see further development of Barron and Henriksson...and of course see which way the Lias situation goes....As far as drafting- they gotta draft the best player on their board when the time comes...but hopefully that player is a C...they do have to address their organizational lack of forward depth- by drafting forwards or by trading a blue chip D prospect or two for a high ceiling F prospect.
Forum: Armchair-GMMar 8 at 7:57
Thread: Rangers Biggest Hole 2C
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Vermathex</b></div><div>the problem is that there is no one in the organization that can take that spot with the slight chance of chytil. The reason is that if our window is 2/3 years away we should draft or trade up in the draft as high as we can to get the best center prospect available. then by the time that window starts to open that center will still be on the ELC and hopefully thriving in the 2C role.</div></div>
For now Strome is the best option to start at 2C next year- assuming they sign him to a short term deal...Chytil still not there yet- so let him continue to develop- once he’s ready- put to 2C

As far as other options for 2C- they can try trading some D prospects for forward prospects...but typically top 2 centers are either drafted or signed UFA (very expensive)...once the season finishes we can see how the draft tiers play out as well as the positions of the Rangers’ picks to see where to take it from there (trade up/down/take your pick)...Rangers will have no shortage of options- except finding 2C outside the organization probably not happening
Forum: Armchair-GMMar 5 at 10:00
Thread: Summer2020-DET-OTT
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>Sure Ottawa is giving up the 34th overall this year for Lias? id rather the 34th pick over Lias in this draft anyday</div></div>

I believe the scouts are saying that teams should get a future NHL player up to about the 50 spot...so yeah- that 34ish pick has value...and the Lias situation has been a disaster...but many experts still see him with an NHL future- likely a bottom 6 grinder...if Lias had a better situation to start his career the Rangers would want more than a 2nd for him- if they would consider trading at all...but the situation is what it is- I just thought OTT- with so many picks (and good prospects already)- might be willing to roll the dice on a player who may be real close to contributing rather than another good prospect who is likely 2-3 years out at a minimum.
Forum: Armchair-GMMar 4 at 6:48
Thread: Rangers with new cap projection
Few points:
1. Strome (based on his 2019/20 stats) will probably get more than 4.5M...thinking more like between 5 and 5.5M. A 2 year deal would be optimal- not too long a commitment and-(if youngsters puch the lineup)- they can trade him by TDL with another year on the contract.
2. Wouldn't yet pencil Krav into the lineup yet...sounds like he is making progress- but several that have seen him in person (albeit fans- not NHL insiders) have commented that he still doesn't look NHL ready.
3. We'll hear from Hank after the season- that will dictate how the goalie situation goes...will not be 3 goalies next year.
4. Staal- by any means necessary - must be removed from this team...retire (doubt it), trade (even more unlikely), buy out ( a good possibility), or on roster healthy scratch....can not see any ice time next year- and wouldn't think of pairing him with Nils.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb 15 at 2:45
Thread: Rangers Veteran Movement
ADA: 4.25M on a 4 year deal is low...his # and term will probably be 3-4 years at 5.25-6M per...and to trade him for a player who'l be UFA in one year- would be a fireable offense...if they do move his RFA rights it will be for a package of picks and/or prospects.

JP and Lias- both guys are unknown quantities at this point, both of whom have a lot invested in them by their respective teams...both teams will allow these guys to marinate in leagues back home to resurrect any value- and neither team will rush to accept a lowball offer- only to see the player find his game with another NHL team.

Strome trade- valuation seems pretty reasonable- but unless Vancouver has injury issues in their middle 6 which will not be resolved by the playoffs- requiring a rental- can't see them making this deal... they have several forward prospects that will be pushing for roster spots the next 1-3 years.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb 15 at 9:29
Thread: with latest play is kreider raising his trade value
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BurgerBoss</b></div><div>Yeah I meant that if he was performing better than at the past seasons. He's pretty much the same player as he was then.</div></div>

While Kreider throughout has career seemingly disappeared for stretches, his yearly production has been pretty consistent- around a 50 pt player per year...and this year he's having an up tick. After a slow start this year he's been very consistent- been playing like a beast just about every game since the 15th or 20th game...this can be contributed to a few things: 1. Finally has consistent linemates. 2. The team overall is much better- not in the same disarray as the past few years. 3. The guy is locked in- knows he's playing for his next contract. Showing what he gives when locked in should have other teams drooling...don't think he wont have the same level of desire playing playoff hockey....that which can carry any team.

That all said- if Sakic's thinking is in line with what I've seen Avs fans express- I doubt they provide the best offer for him...other teams (Bruins, TBL, Blues) seem to be in win now mode more than the Avs...and kudos to the Avs for not wanting to part with the future- maybe that is the best plan...but many teams have found that future never comes- and the Avs really are in position (with such a stocked prospect cupboard) to be a win now team AND with a long contention window.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb 12 at 1:40
Thread: Kreider Making His Case
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Spanky227</b></div><div>who said anything about a lottery first for CK? After rangers sell off they are bound to fall in the standings. I don't think they will make the playoffs, so they'll have a lottery pick-- which means they have the potential to have a top 3 pick (even if it's not probable). I do not think the rangers have a high probability of this, I'm just saying it would be stupid to resign kreider and have Lafreniere's or Stutzle's path to a top 6 LW spot blocked. I'm saying they should follow what the Yankees did a few years back (assuming they don't get a top 3 pick). I know it's baseball but look what the yankees did with Chapman-- they traded him when they weren't playoff bound for Gleyber Torres (stud prospect) and then resigned Chapman in the offseason. All I'm saying is it would be in the best interest of the <em>team</em> to do the same, even if they are interested in keeping CK.




Rangers can talk to CK now about extension and even though it may not be "ethical" they can talk about giving him the opportunity to go for a cup this year and then resigning him to a deal in the summer-- if he really wanted to stay with the rangers he can still take a discount (look at david perron, exposed in expansion draft then signed a team friendly deal with the team that gave him up). The only way your logic works is if the rangers were signing him to a 8 year deal (please god no) for the cap hit to be a bit lower-- they won't be able to if they trade him, the max would be 7 but in the example you say it would be 6 years so it wouldn't be affected.</div></div>


OK..I think I'm understanding you a little better...you're suggesting trading him for assets now...and then trying to sign him when he goes UFA...I don't want to dismiss that plan...right now anything can happen. I just think that if he offers any "hometown discount"- that will come before TDL (and probably would have already presented itself). If they do trade him to a team they know will be hard pressed to resign him- then the possibility does exist that they jump into the UFA bidding for him. I just think at that point all Kreider will consider will be 7 year offers starting at 7M. I don't think the Rangers will go for that. If they really still want him and they are close right now on money AND term then make it happen ASAP. I wouldn't worry about creating a path for any prospect...that's a good problem to have which you solve when it presents itself as a problem- and if lucky enough to have that problem there should be many options to work it out.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb 12 at 8:40
Thread: Kreider Making His Case
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Spanky227</b></div><div>Keep DeGiuseppe on the fourth line over boyle.. he's much faster and plays the same physical style. ADA won't sign for 2.5m, so someone is gonna have to go. I think the rangers should just offer Strome a 2 year 4m a year deal, not 4.5-- his numbers are definitely inflated by panarin-- hopefully a team will overpay for him, I would stick Chytil with panarin if stromer gets traded. Keep in mind the rangers will most likely have a top 10 pick which means they may have an additional player on the team next year.

Also, only way i resign CK is if rangers do not get a top 3 pick in the draft. Lafreniere trumps Kreider and so does Stutzle (his long term outlook is looking like wing).

Here is hoping Hank agrees to be traded by the deadline since Sheshterkin has taken over the #1 spot</div></div>

Problem with your CK strategy is that the 6/6.75 offered in this lineup is if he signs before TDL...No lottery team is going to trade their 1st for a rental...and relying on the Ranger's chances of getting into top 3 in the draft...good luck with that- so if they make the decision to sign him after they know their draft position is outside top 3- will require him to go UFA...and the starting point for that will be 7X7...the term will become the real deal breaker here.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb 10 at 8:19
Thread: Blue Chip Exchange VAN TBL CAR SJS
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>papishark</b></div><div>I dont hate that sharks deal, but id like to get someone closer to the show with the same potential if possible</div></div>

I hear ya, Papi...just thought that since the Sharks prospect pool is arguably around bottom 5 in the league- the addition of a pick and a rising prospect would start to address matters there...all the while locking down the Sharks G situation for years to come. I know that most would rather find lightening in a bottle with an "off the scrap heap" b/u goalie- rather than invest in one....but you mention the Big Show- you can pencil Georgi in now for 25-30 starts...and with his work ethic, desire, and skill- there is a good chance he pushes to be #1 in the near future, if not now.

As far as alternate pieces to this trade- NYR have several other players/prospects that could be included in a deal like this... only Nils (who I would move in a lateral trade), Miller, and Krav are off the table.