JohnJohnson Profile - CapFriendly

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 2 at 11:53 p.m.

Gotta think Lindholm has more value than that

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 2 at 11:39 p.m.

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TheFastAndTheFleuryous</b></div><div>Realistically, there’s just so much that can go wrong with
A. Having an 18-year-old as a first-liner out of camp (I don’t care who he is)
B. Over $25 mil in three defenders, 2 of whom are on the wrong side of 30</div></div>
Jim Rutherford would never hire you

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 2 at 8:37 p.m.

Thread: Dream offseason

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AK50</b></div><div>Ugh, don't bring up that trade, it's looking gnarly for us.
Hronek could prove me wrong and I hope he does, but that was not worth a potential 16 OA pick AND a high second in a STACKED draft. Allvin would've done better had he just hung on to those picks and improved our tiny prospect pool.</div></div>

Couldn’t agree more

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 2 at 8:25 p.m.

Thread: next year Canucks pp units

I just don’t see Rathbone ever making the team at this point
Unfortunately

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 2 at 8:12 p.m.

Thread: Dream offseason

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Pompadour_de_Armstrong</b></div><div>Nemeth for Myers and a 6th after the bonus is paid. Cheaper cap hit (2.5M) for Van than Myers at 50%, and saves them a retention slot. Both expiring contracts. Could bury him to shave another million off the cap hit or just use him as a 6-7 d, which he hasn't been completely terrible at.
Vancouver moves a bunch of cap without paying through the nose or wasting a retention slot. Arizona saves a bunch of real dollars.
Though if Vancouver is rebuilding the roster next year, do they really need the cap space?</div></div>

You would think, but the Kuzmenko extension and Horonek trade make it pretty clear that management thinks this team can turn it around next year.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 27 at 11:25 p.m.

Thread: DET should leverage its cap space

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Random2152</b></div><div>Honestly not certain he is NHL calibre.
Also it would be in line with the stupid things your management team does</div></div>
This management is still stupid but not that stupid

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 27 at 6:08 p.m.

Thread: Deadline done

Don’t know much about Josh Bloom, but I know I’d sure rather have him than Stillman

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 27 at 1:47 a.m.

Thread: 2024-2025

Wow team is set, gonna be some exciting years ahead

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 26 at 7:16 p.m.

Thread: Brock to Boston 2

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DefenseFirst</b></div><div>1st and a 3rd.</div></div>
No one is paying a first for grzleck

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 26 at 3:22 p.m.

Thread: Brock to Boston 2

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DefenseFirst</b></div><div>Make it a second? Grzelcyk has probably 5x the value of boeser.

This deal just makes the bruins worse short and long term</div></div>

Just what exactly do you think Grzeleck is worth?! I get that Boeser has little value right now but a conservative estimate would be a second round pick. You think Grez is worth 5 second round picks, seems like an extreme exaggeration

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 25 at 11:51 p.m.

Thread: TDemkoL

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Prime_Jimbo</b></div><div>The organization needs centers and defensemen . No matter how good demko may be, he'll never be the same without a better defense. There's an assumption he'll be the same when healthy and just good as bubble days but there is risk to that. It's just a different path then repeated Boeser moves.</div></div>

Yes they need centres and dman, so that means the answer is to trade your franchise goalie for a 3rd line center and an okay d prospect?! Makes no sense to me

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 25 at 11:18 p.m.

Thread: TDemkoL

Why

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 25 at 12:36 p.m.

Thread: A different offer for Chychrun

This is incredibly stupid

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 25 at 12:10 a.m.

Thread: Piss off Vancouver

That 25 first rounder would be very appealing, could be a lottery pick

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 24 at 11:02 p.m.

Thread: Retool

Canucks say no to both

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 22 at 11:10 p.m.

Thread: Realistic

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Mr_Gardoki</b></div><div>I'm not a fan of his.</div></div>

I get why you might say that but he’s really starting to turn things around right now

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 22 at 11:08 p.m.

Thread: Realistic

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Mr_Gardoki</b></div><div>I'm very excited to see Nucks fans react lol</div></div>

It’s not that far off, that package might get you Boeser without retention.
At this moment I don’t see the point in trading Boeser, has little value and a great bounce back candidate. Pittsburg should be all over him

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 22 at 12:50 a.m.

Thread: Miller Trade

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>Vegas doesn't have cap for Miller next season. Martinez likely doesn't waive. Vegas still needs a goalie in Brossoit.</div></div>
Ya I know but when has Vegas ever let anything like that stop them before

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 21 at 1:26 a.m.

Thread: At TDL

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Not_Isles5513</b></div><div>I don’t think any team should want JT Miller at that price on their roster, and I think he should be viewed as a negative asset based solely on the fact that he’s considered a toxic personality.</div></div>
I really believe the notion that Miller is a toxic person is really overblown. It’s based solely on a couple viral clips from this year. Last year everybody loved him and there were even calls to make him captain instead of Bo. If he was truly as bad of a personality as people think he is, it would have been known before his 10th season in the league. This isn’t to say that Miller is the greatest guy ever or that he is even worth his contract, and you’re right he clearly does have attitude issues. I just think they are very exaggerated at this point

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 20 at 10:26 p.m.

Thread: Realistic Canucks Deadline

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac555</b></div><div>Why are you just giving the Canes Dermott? Did I miss something? I was told by some others on here that he is good.</div></div>

He’s a good player, solid puck mover but don’t see him having much more potential than a bottom par dman. The issue is that he is constantly hurt. He would have very little trade value because his Qualifying Offer will be 1.75 million this off-season and given his health of late he’s a likely non tender at this point. Like the player but would rather see the Canucks use his spot to develop a younger player.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 20 at 5:38 p.m.

Thread: What if

I’d rather have JT, contact isn’t this bad. Maybe a Miller for Hayes swap with some futures heading to Vancouver makes more sense

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 19 at 8:01 p.m.

Thread: Turn it over

None of these are fair for the other teams

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 18 at 11:17 p.m.

Thread: Who says no

Fair deal

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 18 at 2:14 p.m.

Thread: Adding around the fringes for an all in approach

That’s a lot to ask of the Canucks to retain that much for that long. You’re right that Niemola would be involved in that kind of deal, and a one for one swap could work without retention . I don’t see that Leafs taking garland at full cap. Just not sure there’s a fit here.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 18 at 9:27 a.m.

Thread: TDL - This team would be a problem

That doesn’t get you Hoeglander or Garland

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

JohnJohnson

GoNucks

Member Since

Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day