K1NGB0B

Member Since

Jan. 30, 2017

Favourite Team

Toronto Maple Leafs

2nd Favourite Team

Chicago Blackhawks

Forum Posts

124

Posts per Day

0.0

Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 2, 2019 at 11:35 a.m.

Thread: next year basically as is

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bradynsilk</b></div><div>marner is going to whant over 10 mill per year but the kerfoot deal looks pretty nice</div></div>

This is just based on the rumor of the 2 year deal.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 27, 2019 at 9:56 a.m.

Thread: What I think will happen

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>nchest</b></div><div>Marner isn't getting traded, but for fun if it was with the Canes

Canes - Marner

Leafs - Pesce, Necas, 1st round pick</div></div>

The reason I have 2 1st is that the Leafs know if the Canes offer sheet, they get 4 1sts.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 27, 2019 at 9:55 a.m.

Thread: What I think will happen

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MG1986</b></div><div>So you are saying that the Marner gets offersheeted by the Canes, and then, instead of matching, the Leafs and Canes work out a deal? It would obviously need to include Pesce, so good on you for having him in there. I think it would need to include a 1st, and I would think the Leafs would want back their 2020 1st rounder. Then, I think the canes would need to include Nicholas Roy and Jake Bean.</div></div>

No what I was saying was either or. For the Canes if seriously interested, Pesce and a couple 1sts is way better than 4 1sts and Marner on a bigger than needed deal.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 26, 2019 at 5:47 p.m.

Thread: Lets Get WILD

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TanSor</b></div><div>No thanks. I wouldn't swap Dumba for Marner 1 for 1, personally.</div></div>

Lol

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 26, 2019 at 4:58 p.m.

Thread: Marner to Isles

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jetman</b></div><div>This type of contract will screw Toronto...not enough picks back to let him go but too high of a cap hit to field a team</div></div>

depends on term. 5 years, no way the Leafs match. 1-4 or 6-7 then yes. They cannot have 16 29 and 34 all expire the same year.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 20, 2019 at 7:05 p.m.

Thread: My moves based on new reports

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ExpiredmilkYT</b></div><div>Marner contract was too hard for me to predict. Just chose to do a bridge. Could change Bracco for a lesser spec in the deal.</div></div>

ok thats fair.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 20, 2019 at 6:53 p.m.

Thread: My moves based on new reports

That's a lot to give up for Miller considering the healthy scratch and that Vegas is in cap trouble and has to move parts. Im confused on the Marner contract, is that something that is out there? Most trades look good to me. I would hope this isn't all the Leafs do.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 22, 2019 at 8:33 a.m.

Thread: Oilers and Sens logistics swap

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BeterChiarelli</b></div><div>Considering that Ottawa is retaining on Ryan and taking on the horrendous Lucic buyout, a 3rd Round Pick, which is looking to be a late one at that, isn't much compensation when they could either a) keep playing Ryan, or b) just buy Ryan out.

If that was the 2019 2nd Round Pick, and/or there was a prospect involved, there's clearly much more incentive to make the move, but in either case, I don't know if Ottawa would want to be retaining. A pick and a prospect to free up a roster spot and still make the salary floor makes more sense to me.</div></div>

Ottawa wants out of the Ryan deal as much as Edmonton wants out of the Lucic deal. Ottawa would be doing a buyout either way so why not get a pick, even a 3rd, for it. The retaining part isnt an issue as they need to hit the floor. Buying out Lucic would amount to less money than a Ryan buyout, it's just a longer contract by 1 year.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 21, 2019 at 6:30 p.m.

Thread: Oilers and Sens logistics swap

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CzechingOut</b></div><div>So why dont the Sens just buyout Ryan?</div></div>

It is an option, but in this scenario they can both do that and get comp for helping Edmonton out of their Lucic situation.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 18, 2019 at 11:31 p.m.

Thread: Guesses

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>Larson’s a good player on a good contract. Nylander is a good player on a mediocre contract,

Can we please remember who it was that brought up laine as a comparison here?</div></div>

forget the Laine thing. Larsson isnt good.He has a career high 24 points, has played one full season. Zaitsev is on the same trajectory and I can say hes not good either. Nylander is. Thats the point. and when Nylander gets back to form, his contract will look like a steal.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 18, 2019 at 11:11 p.m.

Thread: Guesses

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>Really weird that you get defensive and put Nylander in the category of laine. Cmon</div></div>

no no. You asked where Nylander is good. You have no defense so you're saying I'm saying Nylander is Laine. I said hes in a slump. Hes not all of a sudden bad. Larsson may have been traded one for one for Taylor Hall, but thats not his measuring stick.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 18, 2019 at 11:06 p.m.

Thread: Guesses

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>Did I miss the part where Nylander was that good?</div></div>

back to back 60pt seasons to start his career, misses a bunch of games from a holdout, slow to come back and all of a sudden hes worth Adam Larsson? I'm assuming you think Patrik Laine is worth Adam Larsson now too?

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 18, 2019 at 10:34 p.m.

Thread: Guesses

Did I miss the part where Adam Larsson was this good? Ive seen a tonne of these Nylander for Larsson trades. No thanks. Stop trading Willy.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 18, 2019 at 10:31 p.m.

Thread: Tampa Bay

Point will get what Marner gets (9.5-10.5) maybe more as he is a center.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 15, 2019 at 9:05 p.m.

Thread: Playoff Push

Thank god you are not the Leafs GM. In what world is Polak an upgrade on Gardiner and DSP an upgrade on Brown. You are trolling right?

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 8, 2019 at 8:34 p.m.

Thread: 1920 Leafs

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BeastModeUnknown</b></div><div>TSN doesn't know everything lol.</div></div>

Both media outlets report the same number, but maybe you know better than them.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 8, 2019 at 8:34 p.m.

Thread: 1920 Leafs

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>draft_em_sign_em_trade_em</b></div><div>Zaitsev can stay, why add to the trade with a future (pick, prospect or young star) just to save a couple million? There's other ways to save money on this roster. Ahem Mr. Nylander, by trading him you're adding future, rather than giving any way like what will happen by moving Z. Rosen and Oz as the 3rd pair (about 2 million combine). No need in re-signing Lindholm either, let all the UFA's walk, just like last summer with JVR, Bozak and Komarov.</div></div>

People need to stop trading Nylander. Hes not a problem. If the Leafs were going to trade him, they wouldn't have waited until after he was signed. His contract will be pennies in a few years anyways when the cap is 90+ anyways. Zaitsev's contract is terrible, and his play is even worse. Lindholm is a quality 4th liner that will require little money and keep the forward group pretty much fully intact.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 8, 2019 at 8:08 p.m.

Thread: 1920 Leafs

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BeastModeUnknown</b></div><div>That is too drastic a change in cap room for the NHL. Its going to be 82M respectively. Zaitsev will need to be paid as a dump, but you can use Ozighanov as a very reliable depth defenseman.</div></div>

TSN and Sportsnet have both reported 85 as a projection. Rise in the revenue and the addition of Seattle with the $650 million buy in could lead to this number. They projected 82 before the expansion announcement and upped it to 85 after

Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 2, 2018 at 12:54 p.m.

Thread: 7 million for a third liner lol

This is a dumb take that has Oilers fan written all over it.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 29, 2017 at 12:45 p.m.

Thread: Leafs BLOCKBUSTER!

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PJF</b></div><div>Doughty said he has 0 interest in playing in Toronto</div></div>

Thats not correct. He said he could see why guys shy away from signing in Toronto because of pressure, but also said he would explore it if the Kings didn't work out for him. Saying that no way LA trades Doughty for Nylander straight up. Wingers are nowhere near as valuable as a top flight offensive right handed defenseman. Nylander plus a 1st and a prospect would likely get it done.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 23, 2017 at 2:48 p.m.

Thread: Joel Quenneville GOAT

TVR cannot come back to CHI town until January 1st as is expansion rules

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 15, 2017 at 6:15 p.m.

Thread: Kane Idea

Very few times in hockey where no matter what you receive in a trade, it still doesn't make sense. To me, Patrick Kane is an example. I know his cap hit and term are monstrous, but in terms of production, hes up there with 87. No way 87 ever gets traded, and I get the sense that's the case with Kane too. Hes so good at what he does, he is not replaceable and I feel trading him is a death wish for the franchise. As far as cap issues, they could easily trade a D man, and Kruger is all but guaranteed to be a Golden Knight. Having said that, what you provided here, in a fair value sense, would work but I think you need two 1st rounders to pull it off.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 15, 2017 at 3:56 p.m.

Thread: Pacioretty, Drouin, Radulov

Drouin will get 6 per year, but I dont think they sign Radulov to 7. If he demands that much they will let him walk.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 15, 2017 at 3:54 p.m.

Thread: Drouin gone was it worth it?

Definitely worth it. Drouin and his agent are locker room cancers. Johnson wouldn't have been enough to get Sergachev and now Tampa gets the best D prospect available, all while avoiding a 5.5-6 mill/year deal with Drouin. Tampa wins this trade in the end I believe.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 12, 2017 at 2:04 p.m.

Thread: Leafs

The Gardiner trade doesnt make sense. We need another dman, not a new dman. I also dont think Trouba is a better option, more of a linear trade. Like the Niemi idea, not sure they will give away a 1st for it but wed gladly take it for a year of his salary and an upgrade in backup G.

12 Next

Page 1

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

K1NGB0B

Member Since

Favourite Team

2nd Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day