DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
Kyle_Davidson
Kyle from Chicago
Member Since
Feb. 22, 2018
Favourite Team
Chicago Blackhawks
2nd Favourite Team
Carolina Hurricanes
Forum Posts
9831
Posts per Day
4.4
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 2:22 a.m.
Thread:
Seider skates like Bambi
Hawks have no interest in that, too much money, too much term, and Jason Dickinson is a better player.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 2:20 a.m.
Thread:
Wings 24
The hawks would bail you out of Husso for the right price, but not interested in the Holl contract.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 2:17 a.m.
Thread:
We have a real dead cap problem
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shaun80</b></div><div>Out in the firs round again? They've beat LA in the first round the last 2 years, can't see it being ay different this time around.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NucksnOilers</b></div><div>Lmao I mean not at all. As mentioned in my post Edmonton has a ton of valuable assets who are playing well well above their pay grade that make us a successful team, we also have a ton of underrated depth who have done exactly as they are paid to do (Perry, Brown, Mcleod). We just have 4-5 guys who are paid too much and the only reason we have had the success we have had with their contracts is due to those other guys. We lost to the cup champs in back to back years, been a consistent top 8 team in the league the past 5 years and gave the Stanley cup champions their best series last year. To say we have a "skill issue" as a team or are going to be disappointments against (even if we do exit early it's not like the past 2 years have been for nothing). This team has tons of great things about it, there are just 3-5 glaring mistakes that need to be fixed if we want to be cup champs</div></div>
I thought it was an obvious reverse jinx, I guess I forgot this was the internet.
Anyways, <a href="/users/Shaun80" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@Shaun80</a> they are not playing the kings, the are playing Vegas in all likelihood. Tounge out of cheek I don’t like that matchup for them.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Tue. at 11:45 p.m.
Thread:
We have a real dead cap problem
Seems to me like you admitted your team has a skill issue. Sadly, they will be out in the first round again this year 💀
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Tue. at 7:51 p.m.
Thread:
If hes available Hawks should be in
I’d probably pay it if this is what Carolina is asking.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mon. at 12:31 a.m.
Thread:
Free JT
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SociallyHawkward</b></div><div>I think it'd be pretty hard for the hawks at this point in the rebuild to extend a player like Tavares who isn't declining as rapidly as guys like foligno. He still has a few good years left to help a team like Colorado or Boston etc.. win a cup on a team friendly deal.</div></div>
I think the hawks will be on the upswing sooner than many expect, and while you are correct in making that point for Tavares sake, I would let the chips fall where they may, so to speak, after making a low risk move like this. Foligno was brought in for leadership, but bought into the rebuild and signed a two year extension to see it through. Tavares probably won’t be a Blackhawk under these circumstances, but if he was able to then I believe the leadership group could convince him to see it through.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sun. at 7:00 a.m.
Thread:
Free JT
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SociallyHawkward</b></div><div>I'd argue 1 year of Tavares in the locker room < the return a half retained Tavares can command.</div></div>
That’s probably true, but I think the return would be severely limited by contextual factors. This would include double retention and/or taking an unwanted contract back from the acquiring team. From that perspective it’s hard for me to agree because the evaluation of the value could be lost due to those factors. If the hawks got Tavares and extended him then I believe the locker room impact might be greater.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 11:40 a.m.
Thread:
2024 opening night
I’m not huge on EJ or Roslovic as the big free agent additions, and I think Vlasic hits 6 AAV, but this is a sensible projection.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 11:28 a.m.
Thread:
Free JT
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SociallyHawkward</b></div><div>But how many of those teams would pay for Tavares' full 11 mil cap hit? I think the idea here would be Toronto gets a ton of cap space and Chicago gets to trade Tavares half retained. Probably won't happen but it's a fun idea</div></div>
If we are dismissing the JT islanders free agency nonsense as a factor, Tavares would be an excellent locker room guy, his game translates well with what we need, and Chicago would be one of the only teams able to offer this flexibility for the leafs.
So yes, flexibility is at the crux of the post… but I think the leafs trading JT away for future considerations would be idiotic.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Fri. at 8:21 p.m.
Thread:
I know what you did
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>If Tavaras agrees to waive, the Hawks probably accept. But Tavaras will be playing 2C in Chicago. He won't get bought out.</div></div>
I get having him at center, that makes a lot of sense, but what about having him on Bedards wing…
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Fri. at 8:20 p.m.
Thread:
I know what you did
Chicago would literally just convince him to play for us. Complementary Blackhawks Jammie’s and bedsheets included.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 12 at 1:33 a.m.
Thread:
Tomorrow
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>According to multiple sources I have spoken to, players coming out of college don't need to do that in order to play in the AHL playoffs. Regardless, Rockford has a pretty full roster with guys that have earned their spots. We'll see though. Can't sign an ATO on CapFriendly anyway.</div></div>
I don’t think they will play for RFD this year, if they turn pro.
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
Apr. 10 at 8:04 p.m.
Thread:
Mercer Roy
If you want to complete the Dach set, you are more than welcome to send us a first round pick for him!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 10 at 6:08 p.m.
Thread:
Habs 24-25
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Billy316</b></div><div>Name 15 Centers with 55% win rate over 1000 draws and we'll talk
Even in a down year 9 points in 26 games with 59% faceoff win rate isnt bad at all
He has issues sure but lets not Pretend all Centers are Equal as Faceoffs are important
If they werent then why not just flip a coin instead of have a faceoff?</div></div>
We are already talking so I’ll skip naming the centers request.
Also, a purely hypothetical question for no particular reason.
Would you rather have Connor Bedard on your team, or a 20 pt player who has 75% faceoff win rate?
You seem to really like faceoff wins, so I think it’s a relevant question.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 10 at 6:04 p.m.
Thread:
Start aiming for playoffs in 2years
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Leafsfan98</b></div><div>Then why not take on 1-2 year cap dumps, we've seen how well it's worked out with Jason Dickinson</div></div>
I would, but the other teams fans keep telling me that their players don’t have negative value and yada yada.
On a real note it’s probably not great for the culture to be other teams dumping grounds. At least you can control the type of person you bring in FA.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 10 at 12:19 a.m.
Thread:
Habs 24-25
Chicago could find 15 Dvoraks in free agency this year for free, I’m not sure why they would pay a 3rd round pick for MTLs
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 10 at 12:16 a.m.
Thread:
Start aiming for playoffs in 2years
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Leafsfan98</b></div><div>So why sign more bad contracts for mid players</div></div>
Legally speaking they have to hit the cap floor so don’t be surprised to see some overpay on short term deals this FA.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 10 at 12:14 a.m.
Thread:
Start aiming for playoffs in 2years
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>batman</b></div><div>Kyle_Davidson thoughts on this ACGM?</div></div>
Not a bad projection at all. Of course there are some things I would do differently with unrestricted free agents and RFA contracts, but a solid projection if the hawks goals are to plug holes short term.
I like the Arvidsson signing for what it is worth
I dislike the Martinez signing
I would go longer term with Vlasic since we can afford higher AAV right now.
I would think Lukas Reichel gets a 1 year deal.
There are some ideas here that I think should be corrected
- Lindstrom will need time to develop before playing in the NHL
-Nazar will likely spend a year in he minors
-If the hawks sign a free agent D it will likely be a RD who can help develop Korchinsky.
-The hawks will probably not bring in a goalie unless they move on from Arvid.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 9 at 7:32 p.m.
Thread:
Natural progression
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wadejos123</b></div><div>Doesn't matter imo. You don't draft for need in the top 5. If you see a guy you think is clearly better you have to take him</div></div>
If you are comparing NHL ceilings I think Leshnov is higher. Could be way off base though.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 9 at 7:31 p.m.
Thread:
Natural progression
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>batman</b></div><div>Colton Dach for Arber Xhekaj</div></div>
I’m gonna say no…
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 9 at 12:13 p.m.
Thread:
Natural progression
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>Demidov should be on the board at #3 as Anaheim likely takes Leshevnov at #2. I also think the Hawks take Lindstrom over Leshevnov even if they fall to #3 and Demidov does go #2.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wadejos123</b></div><div>Hawks would take Lindstrom 3. Levshunov just isn't as good as people make him out to be imo, and hawks have no need for another offensive D. If we want to take an offensive Rd then Parekh is much better anyways</div></div>
The hawks have Sam Rinzel at RD in the organization and that is about it. He is a boom or bust prospect and I think that getting a guy like Leshunov is more important for when Seth Jones declines
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 9 at 12:11 p.m.
Thread:
Natural progression
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>Dach isn't getting moved.</div></div>
I would move him for a first round pick, but actual NHL GM’s wouldn’t be offering it on the same basis that Habs fans want him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 9 at 12:55 a.m.
Thread:
Pinto
Pinto is a great player, but I can’t imagine the acquisition cost, contract, and long term fit is there for a team in the hawks status.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 7 at 5:58 p.m.
Thread:
Next year 3rd overall
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>FoxYou727</b></div><div>Yea I'd say that's fair to drop back 30ish spots and dump 7 million in cap. IIRC Lee grew up a Hawks fan so this truly does seem like a perfect fit</div></div>
That’s always helpful for the media to sell a player to the fans, outside of the value I would only hope Lee is a high quality individual who will help the young hawks grow.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 7 at 5:49 p.m.
Thread:
Laine Karlsson Ullmark
Three trades that are clearly cap dumps, overestimating the rise in the cap to 87.7, and just kind of throwing things together huh?
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com