SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

K_Hab

Member Since
Jul. 7, 2019
Favourite Team
Montreal Canadiens
Forum Posts
117
Posts per Day
0.1
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 15, 2019 at 10:17 a.m.
Thread: Replace shaw by trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gofnut999</b></div><div>Quantity does not equal quality. 30 goal scorers don’t grow on trees. Worth more than a bunch of mediocre picks , a bottom 6 forward, a 3rd string goalie. Noah and the 2nd is not enough, the rest is just a pile of distraction from the fact there is no value there.</div></div>

One 30 goal season does not make him a consistent 30 goal scorer. Jiri Hudler also had one 30 goal season, but noone mistook him for Paccioretty. Again, Athanasiou is overrated. He was second in O zone starts and still managed to let the opposition outscore and outchance him while he was on the ice. He has speed, and was able to score off the rush a bunch this year, but on a terrible Wings team, he was one of the worst defensively and was part of the problem. I'd say if he starts to take his defensive assignments more seriously, his points will go down down drastically.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 11, 2019 at 1:35 p.m.
Thread: Random Krug Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>negative. He is group 1. All group 2 RFAs can be offer sheeted. FOR EXAMPLE:
Meier was a group 2 RFA that didn't play the 40 games for his first season to count towards an accrued season for UFA purposes, yet he played the 10 games so he was offer sheet eligible.

It's a complicated document. Read up a bit and you'll get it.</div></div>

Nope Group 1 RFAs must be on their ELCs by definition and cannot be paid more than what is set out in their table (example 2019 max is $925,000)

"The maximum annual aggregate Paragraph 1 NHL Salary, Signing Bonuses and
games played bonuses permitted to be paid to a Group 1 Player"
Draft Year NHL Compensation
2005 US$ 850,000
2006 US$ 850,000
2007 US$ 875,000
2008 US$ 875,000
25
ARTICLE 9 9.4-9.4
Draft Year NHL Compensation
2009 US$ 900,000
2010 US$ 900,000
2011 - 2022 US$ 925,000

Right back at you
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 11, 2019 at 12:46 p.m.
Thread: Random Krug Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>sigh. All group 2 RFAs are eligible for offer sheets. Have a good day buddy. You just don't get this and are very unwilling to learn about it, so I'm tapping out.</div></div>

This is right out of the article that you sent me "The only possible issue with burning the first year of McAvoy’s ELC is that his restricted free agency clock is moved up a year. But even if McAvoy does become an RFA after the 2018-19 season, he will have fewer than three years of accrued experience due to the 40-game rule. The current CBA states that no other team would be able to sign McAvoy to an offer sheet due to having less than three full seasons under his belt. Essentially, when McAvoy becomes an RFA, he will either need to sign the Bruins’ qualifying offer or sit out until he agrees to a long-term deal."

Just LOL
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 11, 2019 at 12:39 p.m.
Thread: Random Krug Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>Hey man, if you want to be the guy sitting there saying 2+2=goldfish, who am I to stop you. I'll be the guy back down here on earth, knowing that it's 4. Group 1 RFA's that aren't eligible for an offer sheet aren't a new thing. General managers have acknowledged that he can't get an offer sheet. Top reporters like McKenzie have said the same. I don't really feel like doing your googling for you just because you've been dead wrong this whole time, but I googled Charlie McAvoy offer sheet and here were the top results.

<a href="https://boston.cbslocal.com/2017/04/10/why-burning-year-one-of-charlie-mcavoys-contract-isnt-a-big-deal/" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://boston.cbslocal.com/2017/04/10/why-burning-year-one-of-charlie-mcavoys-contract-isnt-a-big-deal/</a>

<a href="https://causewaycrowd.com/2019/07/07/boston-bruins-charlie-mcavoy-leverage/" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://causewaycrowd.com/2019/07/07/boston-bruins-charlie-mcavoy-leverage/</a>

<a href="https://www.nhl.com/news/charlie-mcavoy-priority-for-boston-bruins-in-free-agency/c-308119450" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://www.nhl.com/news/charlie-mcavoy-priority-for-boston-bruins-in-free-agency/c-308119450</a>

(NHL.com says he can't get an offer sheet. whomp whomp.)

<a href="https://twitter.com/MattKalman/status/1145479891103752192" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://twitter.com/MattKalman/status/1145479891103752192</a>

literally the first 5 things. was that really that hard?
Now, you were saying something about ignorance right?</div></div>

Great, so the articles you just cited prove my point, congratulations...he's a group 2 RFA, that due to not having played over 40 games in his first year, is not eligible to receive an offer sheet...where in these articles does it say that he is group 1? Group1 would mean that he is still on his ELC...he is not...He received a qualifying offer from the Bruins (because he is a group 2 RFA), that as long as he doesn't sign, is free to sit out until an agreement is reached...soooo yes, you are ignorant.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 11, 2019 at 11:45 a.m.
Thread: Random Krug Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>Right, but you're looking at the wrong thing. 10.2 is what you want.

For the purposes of this Section 10.2(a), a Player aged 18 or 19 earns a
year of professional experience by playing ten (10) or more NHL Games
in a given NHL Season, and a Player aged 20 or older (or who turns 20
between September 16 and December 31 of the year in which he signs his
first SPC) earns a year of professional experience by playing ten (10) or
more Professional Games under an SPC in a given League Year

This is pretty simple stuff, and rather than run to the CBA, I think you should just check out one of the 100,000 hockey writers that have accurately said that mcavoy and boeser are not eligible for an offer sheet.

You need 3 years of accrued service to be eligible for an offer sheet.
you need 7 years of accrued service to be eligible for UFA status (or be 27 years old)
Boeser played 9 games his rookie year, so he only has two years of accrued service.
McAvoy played 6. so he only has two as well.

Neither are eligible for an offer sheet. It's just a fact man. sorry.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>Right, but you're looking at the wrong thing. 10.2 is what you want.

For the purposes of this Section 10.2(a), a Player aged 18 or 19 earns a
year of professional experience by playing ten (10) or more NHL Games
in a given NHL Season, and a Player aged 20 or older (or who turns 20
between September 16 and December 31 of the year in which he signs his
first SPC) earns a year of professional experience by playing ten (10) or
more Professional Games under an SPC in a given League Year

This is pretty simple stuff, and rather than run to the CBA, I think you should just check out one of the 100,000 hockey writers that have accurately said that mcavoy and boeser are not eligible for an offer sheet.

You need 3 years of accrued service to be eligible for an offer sheet.
you need 7 years of accrued service to be eligible for UFA status (or be 27 years old)
Boeser played 9 games his rookie year, so he only has two years of accrued service.
McAvoy played 6. so he only has two as well.

Neither are eligible for an offer sheet. It's just a fact man. sorry.</div></div>

Dude you are so ignorant it's not even funny. Try reading the header 10.2(a) "Group 2 Players and Free agents"...this is what I've been saying all along. McAvoy is a Group 2 RFA. This is getting exhausting. Read a bit instead of saying "herrrr duurrrr everybody says that he's group 1 so it must be true" you haven't even shown me one article where somebody states that he is a group 1 RFA.