Avatar

KingLundqvist30

Breadman likes Bread
Member Since
Jul. 14, 2017
Favourite Team
New York Rangers
2nd Favourite Team
Edmonton Oilers
Forum Posts
3434
Posts per Day
1.7
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 11 at 2:37 p.m.
Thread: Barb and Goodrow
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RipNasty</b></div><div>Loud and clear my friend! Cheers and good luck in the playoffs, hopefully we'll meet in the eastern conference finals</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KingLundqvist30</b></div><div>Always good to see you on here, cheers!</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMBL</b></div><div>I think as a roster fit, Goodrow would be a good fit since he would be more or less like Kerfoot but without the offense. However, in terms of cap management, I don't think Goodrow brings enough to justify 3.6m for the Leafs considering that Kerfoot's 3.5m is the contract that is always talked about as the one to be moved when there is talk about the Leafs adding a top 6 or top 4 D upgrade. If Goodrow was like 3m, then I could see Dubas being interested maybe since it's at least 500m saving for next year.</div></div>

I think everyone respects what Goodrow &amp; Coleman did for the lightning, but they were rewarded with contracts that were a bit too much imo. The cap hit on Goodrow is tough but it’s the term that is the killer; 5 more years - I don’t see anyone willing to trade for him anytime soon. Same goes for Coleman - good player but too much $ &amp; term
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 11 at 2:14 p.m.
Thread: Barb and Goodrow
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KingLundqvist30</b></div><div>I'm not sure to be honest. This website has fans equating long term contacts = bad players. Every team has that player that the rest of the league will hate on and call a plug yet they are actually useful.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RipNasty</b></div><div>Engvall to a T. Or Holl and Kerfoot as well for that matter. All 3 win their minutes and contribute in a positive way and all 3 are crapped on by almost everyone. Unfortunately, the vast majority of people on this site are here just to fight with everyone else. It's hard to have rational conversations on here.</div></div>

I think as a roster fit, Goodrow would be a good fit since he would be more or less like Kerfoot but without the offense. However, in terms of cap management, I don't think Goodrow brings enough to justify 3.6m for the Leafs considering that Kerfoot's 3.5m is the contract that is always talked about as the one to be moved when there is talk about the Leafs adding a top 6 or top 4 D upgrade. If Goodrow was like 3m, then I could see Dubas being interested maybe since it's at least 500m saving for next year.