Kmode

Worried Canucks Fan

Member Since

Feb. 22, 2018

Favourite Team

Vancouver Canucks

2nd Favourite Team

Vegas Golden Knights

Forum Posts

Posts per Day

0.0

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 2 at 12:57 p.m.

Thread: Petey

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>Hawks obviously decline. How can you possibly think the Canucks get positive value in a Mikheyev deal to the Hawks? Mikheyev is a pure cap dump from the Hawks perspective.</div></div>

Fair, but Hawks also need to support Bedard with some NHL-calibre players. They have OODLES of cap space. Mikheyev's cap hit doesn't even effect them, and actually helps them get to the cap floor.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 21, 2023 at 8:36 p.m.

Thread: 202324 Canucks

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JK74</b></div><div>I'm a Hawks fan and I had to Google him. He's irrelevant at this point in his career. Not sure why he's a trade target but Hawks accept.</div></div>

He's not a target necessarily. Canucks are done with Hoglander.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 21, 2023 at 8:35 p.m.

Thread: 202324 Canucks

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BrockChoy</b></div><div>That garland trade is...yikes...and what's the word about ryczek? Never heard of him before</div></div>

Garland has almost zero value. We aren't getting much for him in return. It's a cap dump.

Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 5, 2022 at 6:26 p.m.

Thread: 202223 Canucks Off-Season

I reverted it and got a mid 4th from NJ instead for DiPietro. I also reverted the Pearson for Puulijarvii trade and just got a pick for Pearson with a bit retained.

Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 5, 2022 at 6:21 p.m.

Thread: 202223 Canucks Off-Season

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jim_Benning_2</b></div><div>I doubt Dipietro would return an early 3rd</div></div>

Maybe not. A 4th make more sense? Or even a 5th?

Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 2, 2022 at 11:42 p.m.

Thread: Pre Draft Canucks

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Schood1c</b></div><div>1 we dont want Meyers
2 we dont have the cap for Meyers
3 you'd have to pay us a 1st plus retain half to even think about trading him the the Bruins. Even Sweeney isn't that stupid</div></div>

You'll have space when all your guys go to LTIR.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 1, 2022 at 4:13 p.m.

Thread: 2022 TDL

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Despise</b></div><div>You’re not getting Schneider plain and simple.</div></div>

I dunno. With Fox and Trouba, I think they may see him as expendable.

Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 1, 2021 at 5:07 p.m.

Thread: 202122

LTIR changes that

Forum: Expansion DraftJul. 13, 2021 at 2:37 p.m.

Thread: Mike's Seattle Kraken Expansion

More importantly, CapFriendly hasn't updated it so I can't remove him.

Forum: Expansion DraftJul. 13, 2021 at 2:35 p.m.

Thread: Mike's Seattle Kraken Expansion

Ah, didn't realize Lucic waived. Thanks.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 21, 2021 at 9:15 p.m.

Thread: 2021 22 Canucks

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BadBadgers</b></div><div>By retaining 1.5 million in salary Holtby’s cap hit would be 2.8 million. A second for one year of a bit less in 3 million in cap relief is a massive overpay. Don’t know what these Detroit fans are talking about this deal is a steal for them</div></div>

I agree with this. The Canucks are so hooped with the cap, and their GM is dumb, so I expect they'll massively overpay to shed some salary.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 21, 2021 at 6:22 p.m.

Thread: 2021 22 Canucks

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DeadWingsv2</b></div><div>Insanely hard pass from Detroit.</div></div>

Acquire a 2nd for one year of Holtby. Y'all have the cap space to acquire bad contracts and picks/prospects.

Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 22, 2020 at 5:16 p.m.

Thread: Pietrangelo

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CowSaysMoo</b></div><div>More is going to have to be given to the Senators to take Baertschi.</div></div>

Possibly, ya. But they will need to get to the cap-floor, and Baertschi can still actually contribute.

Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 11, 2020 at 8:17 p.m.

Thread: 2020-21 Canucks

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shifttee</b></div><div>Yes. under the assumption we moved Dzingel and used his cap# to sign Virtanen. (also assuming Virtanen would sign for 3mil ish and not want something like 5mil.)

you could keep Palmu</div></div>

I'd do Virtanen and a 4th for Fleury everyday of the week. Virt likely gonna cost you 3.5M.

Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 11, 2020 at 7:35 p.m.

Thread: 2020-21 Canucks

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shifttee</b></div><div>The expansion is a big concern.....Assuming the the roster is the same we *should* be able to go 4d 4 forwards

Protect: Aho, Svech, Tero, Trochek. Hamilton, Slavin, Pesce, Bean.

Yeah, we will lose one of Nino, Foegle, Fleury, or Skjei

But honestly this is more stomach-able than loosing Bean.

Bean's Ceiling far exceeds Skjei or Fleury.

Ideally we would lose Skjei or Nino (prefer Nino) because of cap space with Svech and Hamilton need extensions.....but this situation is still workable</div></div>

Fair enough. Then would you do that deal for Fleury?

Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 11, 2020 at 7:02 p.m.

Thread: 2020-21 Canucks

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shifttee</b></div><div>What is going on with all these junk Bean trades all of the sudden

TOR, MTL, and now VAN fans can Bugger off!

we counter with Dzingel and Gardiner for Podkolzin......sound good?</div></div>

I think the Canes will have to deal one of their better, young Dmen because of the expansion draft. WOuld rather not lose one for nothing. Fleury proved his value this post-season, so I think Bean may be the guy to go. What do you think would be fair value for Bean?

Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 11, 2020 at 6:58 p.m.

Thread: Compiling Vancouver Rumors

Need to save at least 1.5M for EP and QH bonuses

Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 19, 2020 at 2:52 a.m.

Thread: What Id Do

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMs</b></div><div>My bad for Sutter but no one will take him and giving something back</div></div>

I kind of agree and have said that a lot. But he's played pretty well in the playoffs so far and a team with some cap that is making a run may take him on for a late pick. Only has one year left on his deal. Possibly wishful thinking..

Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 19, 2020 at 2:27 a.m.

Thread: What Id Do

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>brocklesnar</b></div><div>Juolevi can play 3rd pairing minutes I don't know what your talking about and Rathbone is probably not to far either., Virtanen is a cost controlled RFA and can play anywhere in the lineup. Why would they want to move him especially with there cap issues. VAN right wing depth is already shallow and getting rid of Virtanen your left with Boeser only, and they still have to re-sign Toffoli if possible and Levio, who might not even be the same player returning from his knee injury.</div></div>

Juo got eaten alive all year in the AHL. What makes you think he can play in the NHL? Virtanen is gonna cost a lot after arbitration, and the coach doesn't like him and he's lazy. This team's main issue is defense, so adding a guy like Bean makes complete sense to me. I also have Toffoli re-signing, and signing Fast and Leivo and Mac on the right side too.

Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 19, 2020 at 1:55 a.m.

Thread: What Id Do

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>brocklesnar</b></div><div>VAN is not moving Virtanen and they don't need Bean since they have Hughes, Edler, Juolevi and Rathbone on the left side.</div></div>

Virtanen sucks and is going to be far too expensive. Saying you don't need a guy because they already have guys worse (Juolevi, Rathbone) is shockingly stupid. Neither of those two are ready for the NHL.

Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 19, 2020 at 1:45 a.m.

Thread: What Id Do

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Nighthawk</b></div><div>Not enough cap left for bonuses.
Bean not needed with OJ & Rathbone coming.
Stecher I rather see traded. Too much for 3rd pair D.
Same as above cap needed for 40 & 43</div></div>

Bean not needed because we have two uncertain prospects already? Haha. That's silly. Bean is NHL caliber already. OJ and Rathbone aren't NHL ready. We pay 6M to a third paid D already in Myers...Stecher is a 2nd pairing guy.

Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 19, 2020 at 1:44 a.m.

Thread: What Id Do

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMs</b></div><div>Why did you trade for Sutter and sent him in the minors ?
Gaudette will get 2.4M or 2.8M in a 2 years deal
Markstrom would be the starter
You don't have the capspace to resign Hugues and Pettersson</div></div>

I traded Sutter away....Obvs Marky the starter. Gaud will not get that much. And the Canucks in reality don't have the space to sign those two as of now. So more moves would have to happen.

Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 12, 2019 at 5:27 a.m.

Thread: Hopeful and Realistic

A 6th and retained salary to a team with tons of cap-space and a need down the middle. Seems plausible to me.

Forum: Mock-DraftJun. 20, 2018 at 3:08 p.m.

Thread: Why not this?

No way Van passes on Dobson and/or Bouchard to take another winger...

Forum: Mock-DraftJun. 20, 2018 at 3:07 p.m.

Thread: Final 2018 First Round Mock

I agree with this completely! :tearsofjoy

12 Next

Page 1

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

Kmode

Worried Canucks Fan

Member Since

Favourite Team

2nd Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day