SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Kosterjr

Member Since
May 23, 2018
Favourite Team
Florida Panthers
Forum Posts
3227
Posts per Day
1.5
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 1, 2022 at 10:37 a.m.
Thread: Blockbuster
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kosterjr</b></div><div>Very valid point especially seeing how well Bob is playing however goalie prospects that have the potential of Knight don’t come around often. If the Cats still had Levi I wouldn’t mind the trade as much. If I’m Zito I’m speaking to Lu and Allaire and see if they feel they can get a future goalie in the next couple of drafts. If they say yes and are very confident then Zito might be willing to part ways with Knight even though it would be a tough pill to swallow for fans.</div></div>

For sure. That's why I'm torn. I really think he has the potential to be excellent, but at the same time, Chych fills the teams #1 hole. The fact that the Cats had Levi and Knight in their system at one point is hilarious though.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 1, 2022 at 10:29 a.m.
Thread: Blockbuster
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kartana</b></div><div>I proposed something similar in a different thread, but had Samoskevich in instead of Schwindt under these conditions.

Knight, Samoskevich/Tippett and 1st is fair in my mind. Tippett seems to be a piece available now, so maybe the trade is for Tippett. I really like Samoskevich, though. By adding Kessel and retaining 50% a value of a 2nd+ is added in my mind. Then we take back Vatrano/Hörnqvist and maybe get the value to a 1st. Is it enough to make the trade Knight, Samoskevich, Tippett and 1st? I think so, but could see the hesitation from Florida. I wouldn't mind adding a pick from our side to even it out. One of our late 2nds or our 3rd. I wouldn't mind skipping the extra pick and replacing Tippett with Nause, but it doesn't look to be the case.

So in short; Chychrun, Kessel (50%) and 2nd/3rd for Knight, Samoskevich, Tippett and 1st.</div></div>

Think you'd need to take on Hornqvist or Franky Vats for salary purposes, no? I feel like I read that in your post though...
Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 22, 2022 at 6:36 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 23, 2021 at 10:51 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 9, 2021 at 9:22 p.m.