DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
19
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
Lightman13
Patient gm
Member Since
Aug. 28, 2020
Favourite Team
Minnesota Wild
2nd Favourite Team
Columbus Blue Jackets
Forum Posts
1849
Posts per Day
1.4
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 hours ago
Thread:
Wild Fans Get in Here
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jonh514</b></div><div>I would argue Guhle and Boldy have equivalent value. I would not do this deal as a Habs fan.</div></div>
You're wrong in isolation, and you're doubly wrong in the context of your having a surplus of quality LhDs on the roster and in the pipeline. Kent Hughes would push a peanut with his nose on his hands and knees down St. Catherine's Street in the dead of winter to make this trade, as your knowledgeable colleague <a href="/users/BadaBing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@BadaBing</a> says.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 hours ago
Thread:
Wild Fans Get in Here
Minnesota isn't going to send you a power forward who is more valuable than Trevor Zegras or Cole Caufield for that.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Tue. at 3:40 p.m.
Thread:
Pivot to Boldy
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jackaille</b></div><div>he doesn'T fit MTL, he is talented and good offensively but does nothing defensively, which doesn't fit what MTL wants in their players.
Price will be too steep for what he can bring imo</div></div>
The f*** are you on about?
Boldy is a very solid defensive player who plays a full 200ft game. Your comment is completely off-base.
Minnesota DOES NOT consider this, as it pales in comparison to what we'd ask for him.
Furthermore, they have absolutely ZERO desire to move him. That tweet is merely some idiot blowing smoke out their ass.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 11:04 a.m.
Thread:
Leafs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jaok3</b></div><div>Why would the leafs give up all that for a soon to be 31 yr old LD that has no physical play?<strong> At 3M he might be worth Lilly at best.</strong></div></div>
Toronto fans are such a joke.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 13 at 5:13 p.m.
Thread:
Steady rebuild - MN trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Habs_22_14_20</b></div><div>Brodin
Middleton</div></div>
Not to mention Lambos and O’Rourke in the system.
The left handed defence line was just an excuse to try to validate the deal - but it’s not a good reason. Matheson isn’t worth a 1st in any deal
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 13 at 5:07 p.m.
Thread:
Steady rebuild - MN trade
Matheson would.be Minnesotas 3rd LD
Brutal
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 13 at 5:06 p.m.
Thread:
Steady rebuild - MN trade
Brodin
Middleton
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 13 at 9:53 p.m.
Thread:
Who says no
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Chicago says no, but probably closer than most thought at start of year.</div></div>
If you're talking about the Calder race, yes. If you're talking about overall value? No
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 3 at 12:29 a.m.
Thread:
Call Me Crazy
MIN don't have the cap for it. Mika won't wave. Even in a EA game kind of scenario I still wouldn't if I was GM of MIN. EK is so much better.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 28 at 3:42 p.m.
Thread:
rumour i heard
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MNCountryClub</b></div><div>4th is definitely spot on based on comps - Lazar, Olivier, T Pitlick, Motte, Sundqvist, etc. Hoping there's enough interest to kick that up a round, but I'm not expecting much more than this.
One thing I did wonder about the other day was Jett Woo. If I'm not mistaken, he was a Judd Brackett pick (who is now with MN) and his physicality is on-brand for Guerin. Plus MNs U23 RHD depth beyond Faber is pretty thin.
I suspect they prefer draft capital but the loose connection did cross my mind.</div></div>
i would do woo for duhaime, personally
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 20 at 12:47 p.m.
Thread:
isles big sell what they should try to do
I have no idea why MN would want to make that deal, Ohgren alone is too much of an ask for a team that is a long way away from a real cup run. If anything, MN probably sells kaprisov in a couple of years to align with some of our youngsters.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 9 at 11:20 a.m.
Thread:
Bite
Hartman just re-upped and has a NMC, so this is a no go. And that's to say nothing of the underwhelming value here.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 8 at 1:35 a.m.
Thread:
Flower and fun
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lightman13</b></div><div>May as well propose makar for jee straight up.</div></div>
Was trying to avoid going down that path
Would also accept MacKinnon though
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 7 at 11:25 p.m.
Thread:
Flower and fun
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Cub19</b></div><div>Take out Ritchie and the 1st and it should be a deal</div></div>
No
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 7 at 7:34 p.m.
Thread:
Saw The Johansen Trade on X
-Agree with the Avs fans upthread - the deal seems fine a vacuum, but moving Johansen out with retention doesn't save them any cap space - and now they have a hole at 3C. I think the deal would work if there was no retention on Colorado's end, because they could then go poking around to see what they could get to fill Johansen's spot with the $1.9M in cap savings.
-The way Vatrano is playing, I think he gets back a 1st + a solid prospect on his own. Add in a year and a half retention, and the price goes up. This is a starting point but there needs to be another solid asset added in, imo.
-It's okay, I guess? Ottawa probably doesn't care about Leschyshyn, but again, feels like a decent jumping off point that could be fair value if the market for Tarasenko doesn't coalesce.
-I don't know why Minnesota would do this one. Middleton is a very solid middle-pair guy on a relatively affordable salary that would probably bring back a strong return if they made him available, and I would say the Wild have three LHD currently in their system that are younger and have more upside than Zac Jones at this point. Feels like an easy pass for the Wild.
-Sharks pass extremely easily. Retaining on Sturm would tie up their last remaining retention slot for this year and next - if you're going to ask a team in a rebuild to do that, you better be offering a hell of a lot more than just a 5th rounder. And that's honestly before you get to Sturm - not gonna act like he's a superstar or anything, but he's a strong defensive player who's won more than 60% of his faceoffs this year - he'd easily bring back a 4th rounder on his own.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 7 at 7:28 p.m.
Thread:
Saw The Johansen Trade on X
The Wild would have less than no interest in this
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 7 at 7:46 p.m.
Thread:
Strategic Deadline
Makes zero sense for the Wild, not even remotely interesting, easily gets beat
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 7 at 7:43 p.m.
Thread:
Strategic Deadline
-It's an interesting idea, but I think that the Rangers pass. But they don't hang up the phone, if that makes sense. I just think that Drury is pot committed on Kakko and isn't going to move him in a deal for a pair of guys who might be gone come July 1st, even if it clears most of Goodrow off the books going forward.
-I don't see the sense for the WIld. Barring a huge run, they're out of the playoff hunt, so a rental like Brodie holds minimal value for them. If they're moving Maroon I feel like they do it for futures.
-I mean, the value seems fair, but why does Chicago do this? Unless they really feel like there's something they can unlock in Timmins, it doesn't make much sense to me.
-Simple pass for Vancouver. They paid a 3rd and a 5th for Zadorov 2 months ago - why would they send him out for less at this point when he's been perfectly cromulent for them since they brough him in?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 5 at 6:37 p.m.
Thread:
Imagine this D Core
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BUFF36</b></div><div>Oops I missed that first Sentence!</div></div>
Even if it were, Minnesota doesn’t trade Faber for JJP straight up.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 5 at 4:33 p.m.
Thread:
Imagine this D Core
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lightman13</b></div><div>Not to burst your bubble but minny didn’t draft Faber. They got him in the trade for fiala to the kings. So you’d need to change this to something with the kings</div></div>
Yes I know that. I see my error. Put Minny in the write up. I'll change it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 1 at 1:57 p.m.
Thread:
Kuzmenko
You're not close in the Minnesota trade, not even a little bit
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 31 at 1:01 p.m.
Thread:
I know hes not available but I want him
For me personally, there is no Ek deal that doesn't involve Nikishin.
His cost would be far more than it's worth, you'd be better off just shopping elsewhere.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 29 at 1:06 p.m.
Thread:
Trade with the enemy
Eriksson Ek isn't available. But for the sake of argument, a few points to make:
1) You are offering a 1st in the late 20s, an injury-prone young D yet to play a full season, and a presumably late 1st in 2026, so 2,5 years from now. There's some value but nothing that makes the Wild jump out of joy, no surefire asset. Eriksson Ek is a premium defensive 2C with an extremely team-friendly deal. You have to give something surefire to acquire him.
2) We are trading him to a divisional rival here. That means COL probably needs to pay a bit extra. Also, if we made JEEK available, there'd be a bidding war for the ages driving the price up even more.
So, to sum it up, this purely hypothetical offer is not enough for the WIld to trade their MVP to a rival.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 28 at 9:57 a.m.
Thread:
Buyers without paying much and sellers for value
Why do you think the Wild are buyers? What makes you think a middle-six player with a 5M cap hit for this season and the next is of interest for them. And why do the Wild give a high 2nd round pick? For the pleasure of doing business?
I'm genuinely interested.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 24 at 3:20 p.m.
Thread:
No end in sight
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sabresguy1987</b></div><div>whys that exactly? outpacing production and younger, i get the defensive game may be better with JEK but hence why I added the 2nd</div></div>
Outproducing? By 1 point? That's not outproducing, that's potentially one game from Ek being ahead by 1 point. And Ek has 8 more goals. Ek is also miles better defensively, not to mention the grit and physical play he brings. Ek is also signed for 5 more years at a very good contract, where Mittelstadt't $ value is unknown, and will probably be higher than Ek's. Ek being two years older and including a 2nd round pick two drafts from now doesn't come close to offsetting the value.
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com