SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

LogicOnly

LogicOnly
Member Since
Jul. 28, 2021
Forum Posts
226
Posts per Day
0.2
Forum: Fauteuil - DGSep. 14, 2021 at 2:51 p.m.
Thread: Lets just win the cup
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bias_it_self</b></div><div>In the end, the sharks simply won’t trade to Boston if this is what they’re offering. Rangers, Wild, Ottowa, and Montreal all come to mind when talking about Hertl destination. Every one of those teams will offer more assets that are far more attractive.</div></div>

If that happens, enjoy!
Bruins want no part in that overpaying, thats why they have been so good in general this whole decade, and their 3 year rebuild was still a fun time to watch

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>glarson17</b></div><div>Not all firsts are equal in value, I think that’s pretty obvious. A top 10 pick isn’t on the same level as 25th or later. The sharks are looking for sure NHLers and neither of these two guys are that. Maybe Studnicka is or maybe not. I don’t see how the bruins would think they could offer even less than this and have San Jose not laugh back at them</div></div>

Well duh, a 1st rounder is still valuable and if you dont think so, no reason to continue trying to comment on this website

You clearly just dont know who studnicka is, so thats your problem and i cant help other than just telling you this is a bad trade for a rental lol, its that simple


Guys nothing wrong with not knowing players, just dont try to make passionate arguements about something you do not know about...
Forum: Fauteuil - DGSep. 14, 2021 at 2:38 p.m.
Thread: Lets just win the cup
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>glarson17</b></div><div>I get that everyone has a right to their own opinion on what they feel is fair and I will have a bias towards the sharks since I am a fan of the team, as would anyone else with their own team. I don’t get the delusion of thinking you can get a top centerman for overvalued scraps. One Boston site says the trade would involve 1st and Studnicka and the next site says will Studnicka ever put it together. Doesn’t seem like what San Jose is looking for to me.</div></div>

1st off and most importantly, I am not a bruins fan
Secondly thats the point: "overvalued scraps" is what is wrong with this argument. Studnicka is far from overvalued scraps, a 1st is a 1st, Steen is emerging as a decent prospect, and well the 3rd is scraps I guess but not overvalued considering its a pick. So there is the problem, people just dont understand value lol

This is unforuntaley not a matter ofa opinoin, it is just a matter of peoples lack of research and knowledge, a problem that I like to avoid by doing my research

Bruins reject these two trades, and thats simply a fact, If we wanna talk opinion though I can throw out a couple trades that we can debate lol
Forum: Fauteuil - DGSep. 14, 2021 at 2:23 p.m.
Thread: Lets just win the cup
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LogicOnly</b></div><div>It is more than enough to get Hertl, he is a rental at the moment because he doesnt have a new contract. Studnicka and a 1st is more than enough, throwing in the 3rd and Steen is FAR FAR more than enough

As for the debrusk trade, thats again very obvious. Talking about a guy projected to be traded for a 2nd this offseason and you have Debrusk and a 1st, thats an awful overpayment.</div></div>


Rewrote it lol

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>glarson17</b></div><div>This trade isn’t DeBrusk for Hertl; it’s a maybe nhler, an ahler and a first in two years.</div></div>

<a href="/users/bias_it_self" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@bias_it_self</a> ^ ^ ^

They are still both just factually bad trades lol
Its like if i said hey bruins trade debrusk to the Kraken for a 1st, a 2nd, and Dunn, that would obviously be a bad bad trade lol
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 14, 2021 at 9:15 a.m.
Thread: More 2C
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>cooliny</b></div><div>Debrusk and a 4th probably gets you Erik Gudbranson</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BruinsCharlies</b></div><div>His comment is not embarrassing. That is just not a good offer for a player of JT Millers caliber.

In real life the Bruins would accept this deal in a heartbeat. He's the type of player who can bring it when the games get tough, play C or LW and he is the best player in the trade so it would be a win for Boston.

What's embarrassing is you think that Debrusk plus a fourth is enough to acquire JT Miller. You are entitled to your opinion but my opinion is that you are way off base.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Aasen6</b></div><div>If you think that gets you Miller your an embarrassment to hockey fans everywhere. At minimum it takes debrusk a 1st and studnicka for Vancouver to even consider</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NickC1988</b></div><div>Canucks decline, they paid a lot to get Miller from Tampa (A 1st rounder), they can't openly take less after his value increased further while playing in Vancouver. Probably starts with Vaak and a 1st.</div></div>

You guys need to watch some Debrusk before commenting. This was a rough showing by the capfriendly community