SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

MapleLeafsPhanatic

Member Since
Sep. 14, 2020
Favourite Team
Toronto Maple Leafs
Forum Posts
320
Posts per Day
0.2
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 13, 2023 at 3:03 p.m.
Thread: Win win TOR
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>Demko at 5v5
20/21: .925 SV%, 6.67 GSAA, 7.89 GSAx
21/22: .933 SV% (3rd best), 26.42 GSAA (1st), 19.81 GSAx (3rd)
22/23: .920 SV%, 4.43 GSAA, 7.14 GSAx
22/23 after return from injury: .930 SV%, 7.72 GSAA, 8.22 GSAx

His overall numbers are lower because the Canucks have a terrible d corps and a historically bad PK. If he was on a team that could defend competently he’d be a Vezina candidate year in year out.

Garland is also a good 2nd line winger, especially at 5v5. The Leafs also get rid of the worst player/contract in the trade in Murray</div></div>

Murray can be buried on LTIR if the leafs really want or could be dumped elsewhere for fairly cheap, Garland is not a good 2nd line winger on a contending team, and does not fit the leafs needs what soever.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 12, 2023 at 1:45 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 12, 2023 at 1:41 p.m.
Thread: Marner trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>Please stop.

Since 2016 Toronto has conducted this experiment -- exploring whether you can construct a winning team from the top down. Now that the results are in, and undeniable, and the answer is NO, Toronto fans want to switch places with Los Angeles so that the Kings will look like the top-heavy Maple Leafs and the Maple Leafs will look like the full-depth Kings.

NO.

We're on the upswing. In contrast, as your Big Four contracts expire, you face the prospect of becoming a non-playoff team if you lose even one of them, and utter collapse if Matthews decides to go elsewhere for a better chance at the Cup because you have one of the five worst prospect pools in the League. (The only non-regular you have in your entire system who would make our roster is Matt Knies.)

Keep Mitch Marner for two more seasons. We have a well-balanced team and three of those players are core members of our future. Marner's two seasons wouldn't be anywhere close to sufficient compensation for them.




What awful, uninformed takes. Getting one of the best wingers in the league for only two seasons is not the great boon you guys think it is, since LA wouldn't be able to re-sign him. Timmins is utterly redundant in light of our strength and depth at RhD, so he's valueless to us. Samsonov isn't equivalent in value to any one of our three youngsters. And the idea that Arvidsson is essentially a cap dump is laughably ignorant -- he scored 10 more points this past year than all but four forwards on your team, and I'll go out on a limb and predict that both of you can name those four Maple Leaf forwards without having to look them up.

Absolutely horrible evaluations.</div></div>

I aint reading all that but im happy for you bro, or i hope you get better...
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 6, 2023 at 3:06 p.m.
Thread: If I Were Briere and Jonesy
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sk540</b></div><div>i think it's about the draft capital, combined with another higher pick who may still have the potential to be a game breaker but needs a change. TK technically fits our window, however, he had a career year and plays a position that we currently have a glut of. Maximizing his value and allowing us to add some draft capital that can be used under the current regime's strategies, in combo with Zadina, would be worth it for the Flyers. I think even more so if those picks are for this year to start this offseason and rebuild with a bang, building a strong foundation right off the bat.</div></div>

100%, it makes sense to trying capitalize on his value now, coming off this season his value is probably as high as it will get. Maybe im underating Zadina's as a player and his potential, I just think they should be looking for a higher end prospect and first rounder for him.