Edit Avatar
  • png, jpeg
  • Recommended minimum size 800px by 800px
  • Maximum size: 1MB
Drag image to reposition
Save
Cancel

Meeqs

Member Since
Sep. 14, 2020
Forum Posts
996
Posts per Day
2.23
Forum Threads
20
Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 28 at 3:38 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lenny7</b></div><div>Hasn't been good in 3 years? What are we considering as "Good"? I mean, he put up 42 points in 62 games two years ago (56 pts/82 games, which is pretty much right in line with his career norm...).

Top six winger playing on a prolificly bad offensive team, that somehow still manages to put up excellent possession numbers, while posting nearly unsustainably low shooting percentage last season? I mean, imagine thinking a player who was playing with Rico and Silfverberg last year would somehow light it up offensively?

This year? Suddenly he's back playing an offensive role on a line with Zegras, and all of the sudden he's got 4 goals in the 1st 7 games, where his shooting percentage is right in the middle of where it was during his 2 30+ goal years, and he continues to put up excellent possession numbers.

As for Hall, that's a hilarious example given that he had a full NMC with Buffalo, and apparently only gave the Sabres 2-3 options. You don't get a good return when your hands are tied...

At this point, if you can't get a 1st back or solid prospect back in a deal for him, there's really no point moving him.</div></div>

You call a 49.84% CF over this and last year good?
An xGF% of 47.63% good?

A player who went on a SH% bender in a single year, never to get close to it again and is horrid defensively? And now you're going with small sample sizes?

You sure seem like you think you know what you're talking about but that doesn't seem to be the case.
Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 18 at 2:38 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 3 at 6:42 p.m.