SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

MikeyVC97

MikeyVC97
Member Since
Jun. 22, 2017
Favourite Team
Chicago Blackhawks
2nd Favourite Team
Vegas Golden Knights
Forum Posts
924
Posts per Day
0.4
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 24, 2023 at 11:46 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 24, 2023 at 11:16 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 23, 2023 at 12:03 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 17, 2023 at 11:59 a.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MikeyVC97</b></div><div>He will be 26, IMO I think 15 mil AAV gives you some patience in a top USA market to make more in endorsements not having to deal with the Toronto media and playing with Bedard. There is not a team in one years time who is in cup contention that can afford to give Matthews that type of cash. So if it's about winning he will take less money than he is worth to play for an immediate contender. If it's about his career he will take the most money in the most attractive market with the best long term chances of success. I don't see another franchise who can offer the cash, the city and the potential over 7 years than the Hawks. Do you? If so what team?</div></div>

Well, as I said previously, it would be a smart long term decision for him to take that money if CHI offers it. But, i'd be willing to bet he will be looking at more short term goals, such as going to a team that is closer to winning. But, I do think AZ would be a good option for him, considering their similar trajectory, cap space, and the fact that he is from there. There are also plenty of teams who could easily and would be willing to make room for him, if there is mutual interest. But there definitely aren't many teams outside of CHI that are perfectly set up for such an acquisition. So, in that way, it does make sense. There is just a lot more to it than the financial aspect.

I've also heard rumblings that he may be looking for that big number on a shorter term deal of like 3 to 5 years. Which makes sense from a long term perspective too. Sure he might not have the same money guaranteed beyond that timeframe, but that would put him in a position to move on to the next contender seamlessly without team interests hindering or affecting his own goals/plans/preferences. So, I'm not saying I am against it entirely, there are just a lot of unknown variables that make it a more complicated situation than this would suggest.

If he is willing to be patient, and he isn't going to be toxic to the rebuild, prospects, or team, and he fits CHI's plans, and they can see a manageable path forward even with adding that much salary to the books, then yeah, go for it.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 17, 2023 at 10:55 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 17, 2023 at 10:33 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 17, 2023 at 10:31 a.m.