DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
19
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
NobodyCares
Member Since
Mar. 6, 2017
Forum Posts
978
Posts per Day
0.4
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
GM Game
Apr. 20, 2017 at 1:57 p.m.
Thread:
GM Game - Carolina Hurricanes
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Zach</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NobodyCares</b></div><div>
Sure you do, but it never happened and you're just doing this because you like F50Marco or whatever. What happened in that thread is irrelevant and I thought he was wrong, don't hold that against me, I want whats best for this league.</div></div>
This has nothing to with anyone except you and me, the comment is on my old thread, comment number 505, guess what, you made the comment.
I don't care if things have changed due to acqiring new players or expansion issues, what this is about is you telling me that Vatrano is now worth more than Rask is and it has nothing to do with the fact that Vatrano is expansion exempt.
Then you throw BreKel under the bus for something you know and I know he didn't do, the name calling is repetitive and undeserving in almost all cases, you are the most immature GM in the game, and when I say immature, it's not name calling, it's the truth plain and simple, I think you are on thin ice with a lot of GM's, Carolina's ice just happened to crack now.</div></div>
I didn't throw BreKel under the bus. How is saying he might have said it throwing him under the bus. Drama man, you're all about it. Great work with this.. So if i get this right, if i say something long ago, and then things change, it's not fair of me to change the deal? Your logic is flawless and you're totally understanding me when I said Vatrano > Rask because Rask isn't expansion exempt so we lose him, when we could just keep Vatrano.
Forum:
GM Game
Apr. 20, 2017 at 1:50 p.m.
Thread:
GM Game - Carolina Hurricanes
I tell you what, If you go through your other armchair and find the quote where you say I told you Vatrano+ for Rask, which I don't remember, but it coulda happened like a week ago, I'll give you the trade.
Forum:
GM Game
Apr. 20, 2017 at 1:45 p.m.
Thread:
GM Game - Carolina Hurricanes
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BreKel</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NobodyCares</b></div><div>
We made a good trade before and we could make a good deal again. Why would you do this?</div></div>
People are clearly getting sick of your attitude on here. Every post involves an insult or name calling.</div></div>
I'm not even insulting, you would know if I was. Trust me, you would know.
Forum:
GM Game
Apr. 20, 2017 at 1:44 p.m.
Thread:
GM Game - Carolina Hurricanes
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Zach</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NobodyCares</b></div><div>
We made a good trade before and we could make a good deal again. Why would you do this?</div></div>
I have my reasons.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Zach</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NobodyCares</b></div><div>
We made a good trade before and we could make a good deal again. Why would you do this?</div></div>
I have my reasons.</div></div>
Sure you do, but it never happened and you're just doing this because you like F50Marco or whatever. What happened in that thread is irrelevant and I thought he was wrong, don't hold that against me, I want whats best for this league.
Forum:
GM Game
Apr. 20, 2017 at 1:41 p.m.
Thread:
GM Game - Carolina Hurricanes
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Zach</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NobodyCares</b></div><div>
This is the closest thing I can find to saying Rask for Vatrano + man. If it's in your other thread, where you had like 20 pages it's not relevant to now. I think you're acting like a kid and not in a good way.</div></div>
I will not respond to any offers that Boston sends unless it is under new management.
Thank you, and have a nice day.</div></div>
We made a good trade before and we could make a good deal again. Why would you do this?
Forum:
GM Game
Apr. 20, 2017 at 1:40 p.m.
Thread:
GM Game - Carolina Hurricanes
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Zach</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NobodyCares</b></div><div>
This is the closest thing I can find to saying Rask for Vatrano + man. If it's in your other thread, where you had like 20 pages it's not relevant to now. I think you're acting like a kid and not in a good way.</div></div>
I will not respond to any offers that Boston sends unless it is under new management.
Thank you, and have a nice day.</div></div>
Don't know why you'd do that. I did nothing to you. Thats unfair bud.
Forum:
GM Game
Apr. 20, 2017 at 1:30 p.m.
Thread:
GM Game - Carolina Hurricanes
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NobodyCares</b></div><div>Hey Zach, Hows it going? Looking at your roster I don't see much we want. Maybe something like Rask + ? for Vatrano + Spooner? Have to find out what the + would be and I'd need to get my assistant in on this.</div></div>
This is the closest thing I can find to saying Rask for Vatrano + man. If it's in your other thread, where you had like 20 pages it's not relevant to now. I think you're acting like a kid and not in a good way.
Forum:
GM Game
Apr. 20, 2017 at 1:19 p.m.
Thread:
GM Game Master Thread
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>F50marco</b></div><div>Creating a thread for vacant assistant GM jobs!
I suggest everyone go there so ppl don't have to scroll through endless pages of comments to find the names of people interested in the vacant jobs....</div></div>
That's a good idea. I like how you did something this time, instead of just asking others to do something. Keep it up I like it more.
Forum:
GM Game
Apr. 20, 2017 at 1:13 p.m.
Thread:
GM Game - San Jose Sharks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>krakowitz</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NobodyCares</b></div><div>
Okay we're not interested then. Our guy scored 14 points in 26 games with arizona. Your guy got 19 points in 82 games with wash. He's got to do much more in the playoffs to raise his value as high as you have it in my eyes. I just like him because he's more physical, but I don't think he's that much greater. We'll gracefully backout unless your price comes down. If you change your mind we'll be listening for you.</div></div>
I understand. I really do believe that he'll turn into a Joel Ward, and it seems like this playoff is going to be his coming out party. By no means is that a guarantee, but it's something that I believe to be true</div></div>
That's fair, but we can't afford to meet that type of value. Good luck with him
Forum:
GM Game
Apr. 20, 2017 at 12:31 p.m.
Thread:
****Suggestions for the GM Game****
I'm off this page, I'm just a magnet for no-no's! GL HF everyone. I'll leave it to you big wigs to set everything up.
Forum:
GM Game
Apr. 20, 2017 at 12:30 p.m.
Thread:
GM Game - San Jose Sharks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>krakowitz</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NobodyCares</b></div><div>Interested in anything like Burmistrov + x for Wilson? Not sure what X could be, but do you want to talk about it?</div></div>
Not really. The X would have to be substantial, especially the way he's performed in the playoffs so far.</div></div>
Okay we're not interested then. Our guy scored 14 points in 26 games with arizona. Your guy got 19 points in 82 games with wash. He's got to do much more in the playoffs to raise his value as high as you have it in my eyes. I just like him because he's more physical, but I don't think he's that much greater. We'll gracefully backout unless your price comes down. If you change your mind we'll be listening for you.
Forum:
GM Game
Apr. 20, 2017 at 12:18 p.m.
Thread:
GM Game - San Jose Sharks
Interested in anything like Burmistrov + x for Wilson? Not sure what X could be, but do you want to talk about it?
Forum:
GM Game
Apr. 20, 2017 at 12:16 p.m.
Thread:
GM Game - Carolina Hurricanes
You seem to have done very well in this game so far, so I don't even know why you want Vatrano, unless you're trading Teravainen or Bailey for a big time Dman. That would be a prudent move by you imo. If you could net another big time Dman your roster would be a cup contender imo. Great Job man
Forum:
GM Game
Apr. 20, 2017 at 12:14 p.m.
Thread:
GM Game - Carolina Hurricanes
Still waiting on you for Spooner + Vatrano for Rask and Gauthier.... we could add slightly if you need something small more. Rask and Spooner are basically the same in value imo. Spooner's value raises due to his contract being 2.5M x 3years. That's pretty pimp for a guy who's likely to score 40 points. Let us know if you need a bit more, or if you wanna pull back Gauthier we could take your 1st 2017.
Forum:
GM Game
Apr. 20, 2017 at 12:00 p.m.
Thread:
****Suggestions for the GM Game****
Why don't we all just have a vote on a poll as to if this guy F50Marco should be the co commissioner, because he's just going to act like it anyways. Lets do a poll and if he gets more votes than richochetti or a vote of we don't need a co commissioner he can ramble on like this as much as he wants and try to organize everyone. If he's the co-commisoner I'll be more apt to listen to what he's saying, but he can't just ask questions without contributing anything of substance. Thats just low level stuff. I don't think asking a question about a problem without adding anything to it just creates anxiety in people, it just brings them down. If you come up with a problem, you offer a solution no matter how foolish it is, or you're not contributing.
Forum:
GM Game
Apr. 20, 2017 at 11:43 a.m.
Thread:
****Suggestions for the GM Game****
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Banks</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NobodyCares</b></div><div>F50Marco, I think you're great at starting controversy and asking questions you don't have the answer to. The problem is you're not wise enough to just keep them to yourself and let things play out. Instead you ask people questions to get answers like a little kid asking a teacher. Why don't you let the people who can suggest an answer to a problem talk?</div></div>
You need to stop being so confrontational. Enough is enough, learn to discuss with a level head or leave the discussion to everyone else.</div></div>
Banks, this is reality and he started a thread that said suggestions, without offering any solutions. He just stirred the pot and didn't come through with anything. Aren't you supposed to be independent and truth seeking? Seems like you're good at taking sides, which is the very last thing a successful MOD should ever do. I am very level headed and none of this is ill willed. It's simply the truth that's happening.
Forum:
GM Game
Apr. 20, 2017 at 11:39 a.m.
Thread:
****Suggestions for the GM Game****
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Banks</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NobodyCares</b></div><div>F50Marco, I think you're great at starting controversy and asking questions you don't have the answer to. The problem is you're not wise enough to just keep them to yourself and let things play out. Instead you ask people questions to get answers like a little kid asking a teacher. Why don't you let the people who can suggest an answer to a problem talk?</div></div>
You need to stop being so confrontational. Enough is enough, learn to discuss with a level head or leave the discussion to everyone else.</div></div>
I have a level head, I'm just being honest. You can't possible think that's not the truth. That's just the total truth of whats clearly happening and he's not helping by asking questions without coming up with a solution. That's like winning half the battle, but losing the war.
Forum:
GM Game
Apr. 20, 2017 at 11:38 a.m.
Thread:
****Suggestions for the GM Game****
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ricochetii</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NobodyCares</b></div><div>
I think it'd be corny as hell to do the expansion draft at the actual time it happens. We're not going to be able to do the exact same thing that they do, so this just turns to fantasy nerd crap and is demeaned. I'd rather do this way before and then see how close we got to the real things. At the end of the day, I think real life stuff that happens > this stuff on here. So why do them at the same time when real things would dominate this fake stuff?</div></div>
I agree on the timing thing, but there are some issues with the alphabetical thing. The main issue is that people need to be able to move around between UFA targets. If you're outbid on one player, you might want to go back and bid on a player from a team that has already passed as a plan B. If you wait for Washington and miss out on a player, all the good free agents from other teams are already gone.
EDIT: Same issues with dividing players or GMs into groups.</div></div>
So you just want to make it a big Log type thing? where the entire thread has everyone on it and we bid on everyone and then UFA stops for every player at the same time? I could see that working, thank you for offering a solution instead of just stirring the pot.
Forum:
GM Game
Apr. 20, 2017 at 11:36 a.m.
Thread:
****Suggestions for the GM Game****
F50Marco, I think you're great at starting controversy and asking questions you don't have the answer to. The problem is you're not wise enough to just keep them to yourself and let things play out. Instead you ask people questions to get answers like a little kid asking a teacher. Why don't you let the people who can suggest an answer to a problem talk?
Forum:
GM Game
Apr. 20, 2017 at 11:33 a.m.
Thread:
****Suggestions for the GM Game****
I think we need to do a system either alphabetically by team or split teams into 3 groups. The Group of 10 of the teams nominates 10 players and we bid on those 10 players. Then the next group of 10 the next day nominates 10 players for that day. We bid again for a full day so no-one gets shutout on a guy they want if they come on daily. We keep rotating until every UFA is either signed or passed over. It's gotta be something simple like that and it can't be hourly. You can't say like from 5pm to 7pm we'll bid on Shattenkirk, because then people get shut out big time and get disgruntled.
Forum:
GM Game
Apr. 20, 2017 at 11:30 a.m.
Thread:
****Suggestions for the GM Game****
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>F50marco</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NobodyCares</b></div><div>I stopped reading after your free agency. Again you offer no solutions but just voice problems, which doesn't do anything. My suggestion for Free Agency is that we go Alphabetically by team.
So day 1 it's Anaheims UFA's and everyone bids all day on all their ufo's with the starting bid coming from Anaheim. Then the next day we all do Arizona UFA's. This would lead to a climatic experience when we finally got to Washington and the fireworks would explode. I think it would be fun to do it that way, but everyone is against me so lets just fckin pretend I said nothing in all of this. GOOD JOB EVERYONE!</div></div>
I can't wait to bid on ufo's. I want me a little green humanoid as a pet!
All jokes aside, stop being so defensive. Propose good ideas and we will agree to them. Its that simple. But if your going to be an a-hole and say things like your "stopped reading after free agency" and "Good job Everyone", than by all means maybe we should pretend you didn't say anything.......
THANKS FOR CONTRIBUTING NOBODYCARES!!!!</div></div>
lol you're so great buddy. But what did you think about doing "UFA'S" alphabetically? That way Washington is about last and people go nuts for the big fish.
Forum:
GM Game
Apr. 20, 2017 at 11:28 a.m.
Thread:
****Suggestions for the GM Game****
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BreKel</b></div><div>Yeah, Rangers... You need to see who is inactive and do accordingly with them. Unfortunately for them, it's either you need to be somewhat active and acknowledge you're here or whatever, or they need to be removed. You have plenty of interest from people who'd like to take over a team. Do you want 31 teams being run or 20 with 10 sitting ducks who you don't know whether they're here or not? I'd rather have 31....</div></div>
Hey dude, I've got your back if you decide to go for a promotion. I think you've put the time in and should be considered first because we know you can do it. Outsiders may be able to do it as well, but have they done as much as you already? I think not and I'd rather do the phrase "go with what you know".
Forum:
GM Game
Apr. 20, 2017 at 11:26 a.m.
Thread:
****Suggestions for the GM Game****
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>F50marco</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>matt59</b></div><div>I've been thinking of this a little bit so here's a few suggestions I have. The ideas may be kind of raw so if we like the concept it'll still need to be refined.
Expansion: we make an inactivity cutoff for Nashville and Dallas on April 25th (original planned expansion date). If they're not on by then, they will need to be demoted. Instead of firing them, we appoint an interim gm who is currently an assistant and has the best records of frequent activity. If they return, the formerly inactive gm can serve as co-gm/ assistant. They will not be allowed to be full GM though since there needs to be a penalty for long term inactivity. Exceptions can be made if like in bMans case there was serious personal matters to deal with. In this case we just get a majority of GMs (maybe if we do the subcommittee a 4/7ths vote) to pardon the inactive GM and he will be allowed to resume being head GM. The interim will still serve as their assistant to ensure if they have to take a personal leave again, the assistant can swiftly step in and serve as interim.
If we do this, we can move expansion to may 1. This gives the interim GMs What I was thinking is we make a strictly expansion thread. Teams submit their final expansion protection lists on the expansion thread by May 1. Penalty for not submitting a list by noon EST May 1 can be a 2017 (or nearest year they have a first) first round pick to Vegas. Teams can submit their expansion lists as early as the 25th BUT ONCE A TEAM SUBMITS PROTECTION LIST THEIR ROSTER IS FROZEN UNTIL VEGAS MAKES ITS EXPANSION PICK OFFICIAL. Starting May 1, if Vegas has not already selected a player by trade, they will select players for expansion. They will make picks in order of who submitted expansion lists earliest. The last day expansion picks can be made can be like May 4th. This gives Vegas an ample yet reasonable amount of time to make all their picks that haven't been made yet. If Vegas has not selected a player by noon EST on May 4th, you are not obligated to give Vegas a player (I doubt this will happen, Vegas gm is very active, just wanted to include this just in case). All expansion rules set by the NHL in real life will apply to this game in terms of who can/ can't be picked or exposed/ protected. We can allow teams to send picks to Vegas in order to select or not select a certain player (or a pick to not select a certain group of players). Many teams want to do this now which I'm fine with. I know rangersislesfan has stated his opposition to this under the premise they might want to still move that player in another trade. I counter that if a team wants to commit a player to Vegas this early, and they miss out on moving him in a separate deal, tough luck. The gm already committed the player to Vegas thus that deal must be upheld. This encourages GMs to have freedom of choice but also keeps them honest in terms of accepting the consequences of making an early deal.
I have some other thoughts but don't want to make this post too long so I'll add those later.</div></div>
I like the idea for what to do with inactive GM's, matt. Think it makes perfect sense but can I ask why you feel having the expansion draft nearly 2 months before the real date is necessary? To be honest I haven't heard a good argument for it yet from anyone other then what I assume is that most of the GM's on here are too impatient and want things to happen now now now!
I'm not saying we should do the expansion draft the exact same day as the real thing. mayeb have it over the span of a week prior to the actual things. June 10th - 17th. I feel people are forgetting that the real playoffs are happening right now. The results of how players do and who wins the cup could change a lot of people's perspectives on guys. I strongly think making all these important dates months in advance is unwise if we want this game to be as accurate as possible.</div></div>
I think it'd be corny as hell to do the expansion draft at the actual time it happens. We're not going to be able to do the exact same thing that they do, so this just turns to fantasy nerd crap and is demeaned. I'd rather do this way before and then see how close we got to the real things. At the end of the day, I think real life stuff that happens > this stuff on here. So why do them at the same time when real things would dominate this fake stuff?
Forum:
GM Game
Apr. 20, 2017 at 11:24 a.m.
Thread:
****Suggestions for the GM Game****
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>F50marco</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>rangersandislesfan</b></div><div>I wouldn't want to fire anyone except we might need to with the Expansion draft coming up soon. We'll see in the next few days. And i thought you all wanted to do the expansion draft now? Because Vegas keeps trying to make expansion picks already. And the unofficial trades are just this thing that i actually didn't create. It just means they are very close on a trade but it hasn't happened yet. To make a trade official, both GMs must agree.</div></div>
I don't think anyone wants to fire anyone. Its only brought up now because of the strict time frame we have to do things. If the Nashville Gm for example doesn't do anything through the expansion draft, entry draft and free agency then he really hasn't contributed anything to this game and has wasted what could of been someone else's job who is itching for the opportunity.
Once again so we're clear, the only reason making a decision on inactive GM's is somewhat important now is because key events in the game are coming up like the expansion draft, etc. if these special events were taking place during the actual time they will in real life, the inactive GM's would have a lot more time to come back on the site and start being active again.</div></div>
On this topic I say we wait until 2 days before the first action. I think it's the expansion draft, but if we wait until 2 days before it and then if someone doesn't show up by then we give an Assistant a Promotion. I've got a competent AGM, who could fill the role, so I don't know what the sense in panicking would be. We've got some time still and that person might come back, wait it out and then give the people who don't show up a boot and promote the people who have been here on the wait list.
Forum:
GM Game
Apr. 20, 2017 at 11:20 a.m.
Thread:
****Suggestions for the GM Game****
I stopped reading after your free agency. Again you offer no solutions but just voice problems, which doesn't do anything. My suggestion for Free Agency is that we go Alphabetically by team.
So day 1 it's Anaheims UFA's and everyone bids all day on all their ufo's with the starting bid coming from Anaheim. Then the next day we all do Arizona UFA's. This would lead to a climatic experience when we finally got to Washington and the fireworks would explode. I think it would be fun to do it that way, but everyone is against me so lets just fckin pretend I said nothing in all of this. GOOD JOB EVERYONE!
First
2
3
Next
Page 2
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com