Patrickkane

Patrickkanefanatic

Member Since

Dec. 17, 2022

Favourite Team

Boston Bruins

Forum Posts

251

Posts per Day

1.5

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 23 at 6:49 p.m.

Thread: Re-tool the Leafs

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ecupirate07</b></div><div>you are boxing us all into one based on the one's wild opinions. just because we say no to marner because we cant afford him long term doesnt mean we dont want or like Marner.

dependent on Matthews wants for an extension, i would be highly interested in this deal.

if we took the philly 2nd off the list, we could take on Murray too.</div></div>

I dont think the Leafs need to dump Murray if they get rid of Marner and Matthews.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 1 at 2:34 p.m.

Thread: Is Dubas still an option for Pens GM

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Angusc</b></div><div>If they can't get past the second round, I'd say his contract isn't renewed. Ownership seems like they have high expectations, especially when you have four star players</div></div>

Even if they lost in the 1st round the Leafs would keep him.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 21 at 12:49 a.m.

Thread: off season re-tool

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JaredOfLondon</b></div><div>My goodness, look at you go while refusing to understand context at all.
You see, if you read the thread, you'd know that my use of underlying starts was in response to him saying that the goalie was a better option than samsonov, and clearly he isnt by all standards.
And if you wanna know why i dont think hes very good, well maybe it has something to do with the entire picture, unless you think sam montembault and jeremy swayman are top 15 goalies in the league. Using a couple underlying numbers as a be all end all for "this guy is a top 15 player in the league" is as dumb a thing to say as "if you watched the games you'd know".
But then, youd understand that if you werent getting so mad and throwing a tantrum</div></div>

Yeah ik the guy claimed Samsonov was better even tho those stats say otherwise, but you claimed Vajmelka didn't have good numbers when he in fact does have good stats. Id argue being top 15 in multiple stats that most people use to measure how good a goalie holds far more weight than some random going "well ive watched him play and my eyes work not yours so I know all about him and you dont". Also Montembault has been a pretty good goalie this year for Montreal and Swayman could be a starter in this league. Youre trying really hard to just avoid admitting you got proven wrong.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 21 at 12:16 a.m.

Thread: off season re-tool

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JaredOfLondon</b></div><div>See what i mean? Total projection, you're taking this way too seriously</div></div>

I dont see how him/her pointing out how you behave is projecting. Youre definitely <a href="/users/ripnasty" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@ripnasty</a> using a different account cause you got tired of getting shredded in any argument with that account.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 21 at 12:10 a.m.

Thread: off season re-tool

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JaredOfLondon</b></div><div>You clearly have never seen a coyotes game in your life. It is very obvious.
And yeah, i dont know why people get so mad they start throwing around insults and projecting their insecurities on other people the second someone doesnt like their agm, it is very weird</div></div>

Youre the most fragile person I seen on this site. Getting all mad and throwing a hissy fit every time you get proven wrong then pull the eye test bs because you have nothing else to back up your incorrect points. If Vajmelka isn't a starter and has bad stats why does he rank top 15-20 in underlying stats for goalies? You would think a Leafs fan of all people would know how good Vajmelka is considering he stonewalled your sorry ass team like 3 times in the last 2 years.

https://www.statmuse.com/nhl/ask/karel-vejmelka-vs-toronto-maple-leafs

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 20 at 11:20 p.m.

Thread: off season re-tool

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>howmuchcurrycanyoueat</b></div><div>If Samsonov played on the Yotes and was constantly getting shelled instead of playing on a top 10 defensive team he would probably have worse stats. I dont think its some coincidence he started too look like a good goalie once he went to a good defensive team. But you know what, lets say youre right and Samsonov > Vajmelka, you still claimed Vajmelka wasn't a starter and that he doesnt have good results or put up okay numbers but youre clearly wrong on that and I gave proof.</div></div>

This guy actually tried to claim Vajmelka wasn't a starter or that he doesnt have good numbers lmao holy never seen a guy be so wrong on here before.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 20 at 11:19 p.m.

Thread: off season re-tool

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JaredOfLondon</b></div><div>Just like how you're gonna ignore how hes worse than samsonov in war and saved above expected because it doesnt fit your narrative?</div></div>

You use WAR saves above expected to prove your argument but claim Vajmelka isn't a starter and hasn't put up good stats behind a terrible team yet he ranks top 15 in both of those stats. I guess the stats are only credible when they help your argument.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 1 at 4:42 p.m.

Thread: Bertuzzi to Toronto

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>evelutions2</b></div><div>Why would the Canes pay the Leafs to get Gustafson? If they had truly wanted him, they could have cut out the middle man and gone straight to the caps.</div></div>

How do you know they weren’t interested in him?

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 1 at 4:42 p.m.

Thread: Bertuzzi to Toronto

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MorHitzSeider</b></div><div>Minten and a 1st. Thanks now.</div></div>

Lmfao in what world does Bertuzzi cost more than ROR and Tarasenko? You would think Wings fans would take a lesson from Jackets, Blackhawks and Blues fans and realize these ufas arent worth as much this year. Especially ehen so many teams have already traded 1sts

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 13 at 12:36 a.m.

Thread: Domi Klingberg

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>"any fringe athlete can succeed on a team like that" yet Patrick Kane himself isn't...that's such a misnomer comment. Engvall and Kerfoot you mean who can produce on a line with JT and Nylander or Matthews and Marner? LOL Domi on either one of those lines would pick up a lot more points then either of those guys could....why? Because you still need to see the ice well and have offensive talent, even moreso on a bad team as Patrick Kane is proving.</div></div>

Dude, on a contender Max Domi is a 3rd liner. Theres a reason why nobody bothered trading for him last deadline. Max Domi is the equivalent of <a href="/users/ripnasty" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@ripnasty</a>, mediocre and dumb

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 12 at 11:35 p.m.

Thread: Making a change

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>It's not just $1.25M though. It's $2.75M that you want Chicago to eat. It's not greed. You just have to pay something to get something. Especially under a flat cap. CHI's GM has been pretty clear that he is going to leverage their cap space and that it's going to cost other teams. Also, retention slots are a finite resource. Every team only gets three of them.

I dont know if you remember, but Chicago was bent over a barrel for cap space multiple times during their dynasty years. It's just the way things are.</div></div>

You mean like how he basically took on Mrazeks deal for nothing? Or gave away Debrincat for 50 cents on the dollar? Thats him leveraging cap space lol?

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 12 at 11:34 p.m.

Thread: Domi Klingberg

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>Run-on sentence! LMAO

He's not being spoon-fed if you watch the games. You'd also notice he clearly isn't a 4th liner if you watch him.</div></div>

He gets a lot of minutes and opportunities because theres literally nobody else to play and doesn't have to worry about defence because the Hawks dont care about winning. Any fringe athlete can succeed on a team like that. The Leafs had plenty of scrubs put up decent numbers because they got played like top line players.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 12 at 8:59 p.m.

Thread: Getting rid of Rielly the pizza boy

This would be great if SJ was dumb enough to make that trade and Reilly was willing to move all the way to SJ to play for a worse team.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 12 at 8:36 p.m.

Thread: Karlsson trade

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RipNasty</b></div><div>Why wouldn't he? The cap is going up, he's been a point a game player on a terrible team and he's just starting his prime. And if he's on a team he doesn't want to be on, he can demand a huge contract or get his QO and walk to FA. He has all the power</div></div>

Well, if im gonna pay 10M for a player id rather it be Meier.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 12 at 8:35 p.m.

Thread: Domi Klingberg

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>And yet that didn't work out to well in Carolina...wrong utilization compared to Montreal and Chicago where he's put up his best numbers</div></div>

You mean terrible teams that had no other choice but to play him high up in the lineup because they had nobody better and were able to spoon-fed him opportunities he couldn't earn on a good team?

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 12 at 6:15 p.m.

Thread: Whats his price

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>For Kakko, you're looking at Knies not Sandin. Miller and Lindgren are both better than Sandin. NYR need RW help. Moving Kakko (who has started to play well) is going to cost a LOT more than a 3rd pairing defenseman</div></div>

Sandin has been in the top 4 on a top 5 defensive team this year. Far better than Crappo Krakko who needs to be spoon-feed opportunities just to look better than a replacement level player

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 12 at 6:03 p.m.

Thread: Karlsson trade

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JaredOfLondon</b></div><div>dude, no matter how many times you repeat that nonsense it doesnt make it true. Stop listening to sports radio, it's clearly rotting your brain</div></div>

Oh yeah cause you're sources are so much better lmao.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 12 at 5:40 p.m.

Thread: Domi Klingberg

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>Wrong, Domi is complimentary line mate to a middle 6 line</div></div>

Yet he was a 4th liner for Carolina last year.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 12 at 5:39 p.m.

Thread: Karlsson trade

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JaredOfLondon</b></div><div>nah, you totally thought he signed after and were using their deals as a comparison</div></div>

I dont know if you're allergic to facts or what, but it was reported a tonne that the Tavares contract created an internal cap structure and that Nylander asked for a huge contract with the belief that Marner was going to get a lot and Nylander didn't want to be significantly outlaid by Marner. I never said he signed after, but I guess making things up is easier for you than admitting you dont know what you're talking about.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 12 at 5:36 p.m.

Thread: Making a change

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>Why don't you just waive Janmark? Domi should cost a 2nd straight up with no retention or taking any cap back. So, then you want CHI to eat half of his remaining salary plus all of Janmark's too? That is going to cost something.</div></div>

Because Edmonton needs all the cap they can get. I dont know why fans on here are so greedy lol, since when does it cost something more than a low pick if anything to get rid of a 1.25M cap hit.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 12 at 5:34 p.m.

Thread: Karlsson trade

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RipNasty</b></div><div>Why wouldn't he? He can demand 10 million and if he doesn't get it, then he can get his QO or become an FA and then go wherever he wants. He has all the power in his next deal.

Also we get it, you love Kane and no matter how terrible of a person he is, you are going to pump his tires. He's the hero of hockey bros.</div></div>

You think a team is paying 10M long term for Meier lol? Im pretty sure he would take 8.5M and run with it if he can.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 12 at 5:34 p.m.

Thread: Karlsson trade

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rob32sjsharks</b></div><div>You may be right.
In all fairness TOR doesn't do this deal IMO. It's a lot to give up to MAYBE improve your team 5-10 goals in the regular season and playoffs combined over Nylander's production.</div></div>

The only reason I would be interested is I feel like Nylander is going to want to be paid like Matthews and Marner, at least if we trade for Meier we can jump the gun and get him signed 1st hopefully to a 8.5Mx8.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 11 at 3:53 p.m.

Thread: The Year without Bratt

You're willing to pay Meier 10M and Tarasenko 9m but not pay Bratt?

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 11 at 3:52 p.m.

Thread: Karlsson trade

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JaredOfLondon</b></div><div>Lol, this all started because you totally thought nylander signed after matthews and marner and you've been moving goal posts trying to be right since. It's a bad look bud, and you're not gonna make it work with "you dont know hockey" jabs.
And nylander was very much in physical game shape in every way when he came back, but then youd know that if your sources on the matter weren't a morning call in show</div></div>

I never said Nylander signed after Matthews and Marner, I said he asked for a lot because he didn't want to end up signing for significantly less than Matthews and Marner but mainly Marner.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 11 at 3:51 p.m.

Thread: Making a change

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>CHI will take Janmark OR retain salary, but not both. And even then, a second seems light.</div></div>

So then just waive Janmark, only 200k stays on the cap

12 Next

Page 1

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

Patrickkane

Patrickkanefanatic

Member Since

Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day