Rangerfan01

Rangerstown

Member Since

Nov. 19, 2017

Favourite Team

New York Rangers

Forum Posts

165

Posts per Day

0.1

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 12, 2019 at 7:48 p.m.

Thread: Trades at the deadline

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jetman</b></div><div>When NYR fans did the trading....Hayes will get a 1st rounder and a B prospect</div></div>

Would you say a first and Appleton is a fair return for Hayes? Obviously not getting someone of Vesalainen's caliber but they're going to fetch a good prospect in a trade for Hayes.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 24, 2019 at 12:03 p.m.

Thread: NY Rangers Trade

Yikes this is worse than some of the trades us ranger fans make on here

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 21, 2019 at 10:02 p.m.

Thread: Trade with avs

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>aspina25</b></div><div>The f*ck is this?? Avs are winning that trade by a mile</div></div>
I didn't want to overshoot but if avs had to add something then that's doable. I think Buch needs to go at this point. Effort isn't consistent, can't get off the fourth line even without AV here

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 10, 2019 at 4:01 p.m.

Thread: Burakovsky plus plus

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Eli</b></div><div>Thanks. Any thoughts on Hayes' ability to play wing?</div></div>

Rangers have put him at wing before. He looked pretty good there but at this point in his career he's gonna look better at center. If caps are in market for top 6 winger swap him for Kreider and add a bit more to caps side of the deal since he's got another year and a team friendly contract?

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 27, 2018 at 1:47 p.m.

Thread: Just having a fun time

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>A few times and he looked ok</div></div>

Yikes

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 26, 2018 at 11:58 p.m.

Thread: Keep Hayes

I agree that keeping Hayes is a good idea, but what do you do with all of the centers? Can Lias really stay on the fourth line forever? And is Chytil gonna be a winger?

Good problem to have though. I'm all for it. Pretty happy with how rebuild has shaken out so far.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 26, 2018 at 6:28 p.m.

Thread: What a Kevin Hayes trade might look like

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ItWasIn</b></div><div>I'm not sure if you want Shattenkirk and Faulk both in your top 6. Great offensive players sure, but leave much to be desired defensively</div></div>

Maybe pesce instead?

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 14, 2018 at 10:16 a.m.

Thread: Pacioretty , Kovalchuk , Voynov, Budaj

1 star for putting someone who beat up his wife back in the league

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 13, 2018 at 6:25 p.m.

Thread: Faulk trade?

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shifttee</b></div><div>As a CAR fan i would take that deal.

Hell if you wanna give the 9OA i say thank you, but that's not gonna happen

the Trade he as there is fair, Namestnikov helps us out offensively were we struggled last year</div></div>

9th overall a bit much especially for a team that hasn't been in the first round too much. Need to get more players in the system with draft and with that pick someone who could have a nice impact on a rebuilding team. Agree that vlad could definitely help out offensively along with drafting svechnikov 2nd overall.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 13, 2018 at 5:17 p.m.

Thread: Faulk trade?

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jakemessling20</b></div><div>It might take more to get him, but Id rather go for Hanifin. Too redundant to shatty and hanifin a lefty and younger</div></div>

Would probably require 9th overall. Not sure Gorton wants to give that up.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 8, 2018 at 11:25 p.m.

Thread: Blockbuster with Carolina

Too much leaving carolina

Forum: NHL TradesFeb. 26, 2018 at 6:49 p.m.

Thread: (TBL / NYR) - McDonagh, Miller for Namestnikov, Hájek, Howden, 1st, 2nd

Could have gotten more. But will be a while until we see how fair trade ends up being. Right now lightning seem to get the edge

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 24, 2018 at 10:01 p.m.

Thread: Rangers

Theres no way rangers are taking orpik. Even with his contract this isn’t too good.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 22, 2018 at 5:26 p.m.

Thread: time to go for it

Right taylor hall is getting traded

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 22, 2018 at 4:07 p.m.

Thread: Grabner trade

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Larkinisking</b></div><div>Gorton might ask for a 1st but doubt he gets it, One of the insiders can't remember who said a 2nd+Prospect more then likely. It might've been McKenzie maybe.</div></div>

Yes Mckenzie

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 21, 2018 at 8:12 p.m.

Thread: Is it worth it

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Liamthepro</b></div><div>Man, he's not saying Gardiner = Burns or Karlsson.

Gardiner is pretty good, and would help just about any team's D, that goes double for a Rangers team selling off McDonagh to follow Holden.

Rangers told their fans they will sell off players, they are already awful. You hope they are trying to rebuild right? This deal would sure help</div></div>

I know he isn't. My point was Burns and Karlsson are elite and therefore they're turnovers matter less.
Of course Rangers are trying to rebuild. The value of the deal is fair, it's just that they're more likely to wait until draft if they don't get a high caliber player at the deadline. Remember if he's traded at deadline, that's two playoff runs and a full season of him.
Done arguing with you. Maybe we think differently, but your head seems to be farther up your rectum than mine.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 21, 2018 at 7:59 p.m.

Thread: Is it worth it

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Liamthepro</b></div><div>Hey Rangers fan, this is a sweetheart deal for you, your GM would snap it up in a second. You have your head stuck in your rectum I'm afraid. Do you know the saying "You needn't look a gift horse in the mouth"?
Just traded Holden for a 3rd and an empty contract, but you are cluelessly babbling about Marner and Liljegren...</div></div>

Not cluelessly. Gorton doesn't have to trade Mcdonagh. I don't think he is looking to add a 26 year old in a rebuild. He's only going to accept an overpayment at the deadline (i.e. if the Lightning were to give up Sergachev).
Otherwise, he will revisit at draft. Maybe this trade works at the draft. But certainly not now.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 21, 2018 at 7:49 p.m.

Thread: Is it worth it

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div></div></div>
Fair point. It's just that Rangers defense is so bad that Gardiner is not the proper answer. Also, Burns and Karlsson have a much higher skill set than Gardiner. It's hard to compare them to him.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 21, 2018 at 7:32 p.m.

Thread: Is it worth it

I looked up gardiner's stats. 83 giveaways for a defenseman 62 games in is pretty awful. To take that plus a 4 million cap for another year isn't great. Leafs have to add something to sweeten the deal. Rangers already have enough turnover machines on defense.
I think a deal not involving Gardiner would interest rangers, however. Depends what comes back though, and what Lamoriello is willing to part ways with. Liljegren and Marner immediately come up and Rangers would want one of them. And I highly doubt either of them are going anywhere.

In short, a trade between this teams likely won't work.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 21, 2018 at 5:57 p.m.

Thread: Rangers Deadline

Someone is going to say nash trade sucks, but I've seen so many different things on here that I guess we have to wait until Gorton makes his move to find out. Change Winnipeg pick to first rounder. Grabner would probably get a pick too from penguins in addition to sprong. Desharnais probably gets a fifth instead.
And now for the McDonagh trade. I really don't think he's going anywhere unless there's a serious blue chip coming the other way. And tampa isn't parting with Sergachev most likely, which would be the only sensible target. In that case, revisit a trade for him at the draft. There's no rush to trade him now.

Pretty solid though. A little off on the picks but most of the trades seem to be about right.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 21, 2018 at 1:55 p.m.

Thread: A Good Start...

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sagecoll</b></div><div>Well then who's a centerpiece then to a deal with Tampa? Not Namestnikov. It's Serg or Point. And if it's not, then no deal with Tampa</div></div>

That’s why they’re not going to deal Mac until draft

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 21, 2018 at 9:57 a.m.

Thread: A Good Start...

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sagecoll</b></div><div>None of his development has gone unexpected. He was drafted as a big, conservative, stay-at-home defenseman, who is weak at skating and possessing the puck zone to zone. If he meets his expectations he will be a low-middle 6 d-man.

He would be a terrible centerpiece to a McDonagh trade. I'm looking at every other contender here (they wouldn't trade McD within division):

Dallas: Miro
Calgary: Fox
Bruins: Debrusk
Toronto: Liljegren/Dermott
Nashville: Tolvanen
Jets: Roslovic
Blues: Dunn/Thomas/Kyrou/Thompson
Wild: Kaprizov
Avs: Jost
Vegas: Glass/Suzuki/Brannstrom.
Sharks: Lebanc
Ducks: Steel/Kase
Kings: Kempe/Villardi

ANY OF THESE GUYS ARE SEVERAL DEGREES BETTER THAN FOOTE.</div></div>
Yeah obviously. Didn’t say as a centerpiece. Just saying in general.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 21, 2018 at 12:03 a.m.

Thread: Trade deadline - Zuccarello, Grabner, Green

No reason for Nashville to trade for green. Defense is already good enough and why give up more picks/assets? Also can’t see them trading for both zucc and grabner. Either take out grabner and leave at zucc for first and fabbro or take out zucc and get rid of fabbro and Pettersson

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 20, 2018 at 11:55 p.m.

Thread: A Good Start...

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sagecoll</b></div><div>Looks fine until the McDonagh trade. Rangers don't need Namestnikov, at 25 he's great but they're rebuilding. Foote is a trash prospect. Bottom 6 defender in this league on a contending team.</div></div>
He’s 19. Has been excellent in juniors. You can’t call someone a trash prospect unless their development goes unexpected. Which so far Foote has showed no signs of. Would definitely take him on rangers if trade was right.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 20, 2018 at 4:24 p.m.

Thread: NYR Trying to be realistic

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mhan63</b></div><div>It's certainly a risk, but if you believe this kid is going to be a cornerstone of your team, you might be inclined to trade that pick.
I think Miller is fair. He's struggled this year, but could turn it around with a change of scenery. Stanley is one of WPG's top prospects.
Zucc, I'm not sure what people think of him. I've seen other posts say 1st, B prospect and a 2nd or worse. I've also seen posts where he takes 2 top prospects and a 1st from a team. I chose in the middle</div></div>

Miller trade makes no sense. Struggles are because he is playing center. Also, Stanley is not a top prospect for winnipeg. Would be a risk for Rangers to take him without having other good pieces in the deal.

12 Next

Page 1

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

Rangerfan01

Rangerstown

Member Since

Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day