DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
RedWings86
Member Since
Dec. 27, 2018
Favourite Team
Detroit Red Wings
Forum Posts
266
Posts per Day
0.2
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 22, 2022 at 7:54 p.m.
Thread:
mtl draft
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LAkingsfan77777</b></div><div>Lebrun mentioned Detroit as a possibility, and Detroit Hockey Now is rocking with it and why it could make sense.
No offense but I think Lebrun knows 10x more than you do about what's happening around the league.
also, I already said what Detroit is giving up is way too much but the idea behind Petry to Detroit is not a hot take and is not a stupid idea as it is a real possibility. Besides between what u think the team needs and Yzerman I'm totally going w Yzerman since he's built the team that's currently fighting for a 3 peat.</div></div>
No one knows what Stevie is thinking. He is one of if not the most tight lipped GM, and holds his staff to the same standards. Lebum listed Detroit as a ‘possibility’ likely due to their need for a LHD which makes sense. It’s educated speculation tho, that’s it.
This trade is absolute hot garbage anyways. And Detroit is not at all in a position to trade futures even for a need and especially not for an aging defensemen.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 22, 2022 at 1:38 p.m.
Thread:
larkin after dark
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DirtyDangle</b></div><div>no problem changing the 2022 1st to a 23' 1st. leafs got knocked out in the 1st round so the pick is likely higher than where it ends up next season.</div></div>
Yep, and always the possibility they go further next year. With 23’ being deeper I think the Wings would be willing to take that risk tho.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 22, 2022 at 1:09 p.m.
Thread:
larkin after dark
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DirtyDangle</b></div><div>agreed. he has significant value which is why i offered significant value back.</div></div>
The picks are the most enticing thing towards what you offered, but Larkin is a mid 1st draft pick putting up better numbers for where he was drafted. A late 1st is not doing it, especially when the 2023 pick would be more sought after. And I get your UFA argument, but see an extension as more likely to happen and the Wings willing to flirt moving Larks only for an overpayment. See Stevie standing pat for this offer.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 22, 2022 at 11:09 a.m.
Thread:
larkin after dark
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DirtyDangle</b></div><div>that's not what a sign and trade is. leafs came close with hyman but it ultimately fell through. even then boston paid rental value for him.
larkin is a run of the mill 1c, maybe even below average.</div></div>
No one knows the GMs discussions and where value correlates. Lindholm could have just as easily received ‘rental’ value due to his numbers. Boston could have jumped ship if an extension wasn’t in the realm of possibilities. We can only guess and are going to continue to split hairs, so agree to disagree I guess.
Agree he would be an excellent 2C , one of the lower end 1C. But young 1C’s still have significant trade value.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 22, 2022 at 10:47 a.m.
Thread:
larkin after dark
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DirtyDangle</b></div><div>neither of those are a sign and trade.
larkin is good but he's not elite.</div></div>
I meant sign and trade vaguely, whether a literal sign and trade or close to it. You can’t honestly say that when Boston signed Lindholm, within 24 hours a max extension happens, that there wasn’t a extension discussion prior to the trade. You don’t know that and if I’m a betting man given it happened within 24 hours, I’d wager it was discussed. Just as you are basing your argument and trade value on assumptions I am as well. And go take a look at the other Wings’ fans comments, you’ll hear a bit of the same from Wings fans. Dude countered with 5x 1sts.
No he is elite, he’s not franchise nor top of the big dogs.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 22, 2022 at 10:35 a.m.
Thread:
larkin after dark
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DirtyDangle</b></div><div>sign and trades don't happen. a rental is a rental. i think you're being biased on this one.</div></div>
The Wings literally just traded an extended Mantha recently. Boston hand shake extension in place for Lindholm. It does happen.
You are also forgetting the fact he is an elite, young Center, which like with elite young D carry a premium in the league. And DET has a severe need for centers, so why would they not try to get one in a return at the very least or do all they can to retain Larks? Someone’s overbidding your offer.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 22, 2022 at 9:53 a.m.
Thread:
larkin after dark
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DirtyDangle</b></div><div>1st, 2nd, top prospect is a good return for a rental. what would detroit realistically want.</div></div>
Larkin is one of those players that isn’t necessarily untouchable, but you are going to need to pay more to obtain him. You’re also putting too much stock on his UFA status and the value for a rental. He’ll either be extended by DET or a sign and trade.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 22, 2022 at 9:29 a.m.
Thread:
Working til August
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Koskinen_The_Great</b></div><div>Penguins don’t have the cap and will be buying at the TDL. If you do the math. The Habs taking 1.25M a year saves the Wings from taking 2.25M a year in retention instead of 1M as the math shows here. So being pointless is actually quite wrong.</div></div>
But we’re paying for retention when there isn’t a need to. And this trade again screems Leddy 2.0 where I am extremely surprised we recouped the pick for him. One more season of the same, Petry loses all value he has especially with his age. I find it hard to believe he’ll perform better with the Wings and recoup the pick or receive a slight upgrade. Not seeing it as a slight upgrade tho with Zad+a 2nd+a 3rd being traded for Petry especially considering I don’t feel that is accurate of Petry’s value.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 22, 2022 at 9:22 a.m.
Thread:
Working til August
Retention kind of pointless, Wings have all the cap space in the world so Zadina isn’t happening. Don’t want Petry either… I understand it’s been brought up in the media, it’s just not a good move for the Wings right now. What has anyone seen this past season from the Wings that warrants giving up futures for an aging D? I get the flip intent, doubt he excels on the Wings tho. We lucked out with Leddy value last year, seems like a similar approach.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 22, 2022 at 9:13 a.m.
Thread:
larkin after dark
🍿
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 21, 2022 at 2:17 p.m.
Thread:
wings 23-24
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>erh1991</b></div><div>1. Or larks enjoys playing at home, wants to save the team some $$ to win a cup in the future.
2. For sure, i agree. i set this up as 22-23 so i wasnt sure how to sign him prior
3. not sure how much more hronek returns. What were you thinking the return should be?
4. This would be a year after a new coach. Giving Stevie enough time to see what he needs.
5. i dont think so
6. Pasta is definitely more of a long shot
7. He would be a 2nd year pro at this point & Ras looked like a for sure 3rd line center towards the end of last season, I agree a little high for a 4C but a former top 10 pick that steve might see some upside in
8. Yes. Does not impress the big man
9. We'll see how the D shakes out.</div></div>
1. I really hope he takes a home-team discount! He’s making below what he should make atm though and I just really see the change in agent in combination w/ his recent media comments (about the team sucking) as leading to a higher $ AAV. Term is spot on tho.
2. I figured that was the case! Stevie and Bert’s media comments have them shooting for an extension this summer, and unlikely but hopefully it’s not a 1 year extension.
3. I’d think a 1st round pick is in play. Teams pay a premium for top 4 D, Lindholm could be a comparable and Hronek is younger and put up more pts.
4. Yep! I’m essentially hoping that trade doesn’t come to fruition.
5. We’ll see how he performs. With a slightly improved team, it should be better than 3.31 GAA and .901 Sv%. However, those numbers don’t warrant 3x5.25M in my opinion.
6. Agreed, game for either tbh.
7. Doubtful the 8OA will play pro their first year but I guess we’ll see! Personally thought Ras played better on the Wing, but his big body is needed in front of the net which is easier at C. Him and Jost would be an interesting 3rd line.
8. 👍
9. True
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 21, 2022 at 12:33 p.m.
Thread:
wings 23-24
1. With his change in agency, Larks will probably ask for more.
2. Assuming these are offseason moves, Bert will either be traded or extended prior to the TDL. He is not going into the offseason as a UFA with the Wings.
3. Hronek returns more.
4. Wait and see how Zadina does under a new coach, if it’s a bit of the same for sure move him.
5. Ned’s contract is too rich
6. Pasta and Weegar can just as easily receive that contract+term from a contending team. $ amount will need to be higher to attract them and probably more term needed for Weegar.
7. While I agree we probably go center in this draft, doubtful a 1st year pro center plugs into line 2 immediately. There is no C depth behind him and Ras is definitely not filling the 2C spot, consider exploring an alternative center. Also 3x3 for a 4C is too rich.
8. Curious, why are you trading Veleno? Is it with the assumption he provides a bit of the same again next year?
9. 23 FA is much deeper than 22. Better D to be had than Jensen, but also with the Wings defensive depth there may not be a need for another depth signing.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 21, 2022 at 10:45 a.m.
Thread:
Yzertag
DET declines. Atleast you are trading a player that DET has a positional need for, but Stevie does not tolerate divas so doubtful PLD would be on his radar.
Also personally not giving up that much for PLD. 2023 pick should be low and with the draft so deep, that pick should be better than PLD.
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
Jun. 21, 2022 at 10:40 a.m.
Thread:
Next Generation Mtl 2021-2022-2
DET 100% declines.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 20, 2022 at 11:25 a.m.
Thread:
Next Step in the Rebuild
I like your direction. Been seeing a lot of ‘playoff contention’ and ‘going for it’ ACGMs for the Wings, but rebuilding for atleast next season is in their better interest. A few things I’d adjust (my opinion):
Not offer sheeting Hague. He has upside and we definitely have a need at LHD, but he seems more of a depth piece as of right now. I feel it would be better to acquire a fill-in D via free agency like Cole.
While D can be regarded as a position of strength, LHD is not. So I’d keep Johansson as well.
Personally don’t want KK, but his contract is too rich for where his value is right now. He’ll get a bridge deal for a lower AAV, likely under his qualifying offer.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 18, 2022 at 12:56 p.m.
Thread:
Time to Contend
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TheThunder</b></div><div>Unless AZ gets blown away they'd be mentally deficient to trade him and this offer isn't a blow them away offer</div></div>
Don’t disagree with you there. An overpay to pry him away essentially.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 18, 2022 at 12:20 p.m.
Thread:
Time to Contend
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DeadWingsv2</b></div><div>Detroit should not be in on Chychrun for what he'll cost. That return doesn't get him and at the same time, it's too much to give up.</div></div>
21 pts, -20 +/-, and injuries in 47games. Agree DET shouldn’t be in on him, but his values lower than it’s ever been and I don’t think he’s getting much more of a return than that. Yotes should hold on to him anyways and hope he rebounds.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 18, 2022 at 11:34 a.m.
Thread:
Go for it
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hockeymecka</b></div><div>Thank you! None taken. Waiting for deals to be made from experienced ACGMs. Looking at the deals right now anyone clearly knows they are crap. With so many experienced people around here it’s a great opportunity to sort out the real value but also take a look at where the emotional fan value aspect of everything is.</div></div>
‘Experienced ACGM’ is an oxymoron. You won’t find much of that on here and every fan base overvalues their players. It’d be cool if CF could adopt some sort of value trade system like with fantasy football.
If you’re looking for a player to acquire from DET, try Hronek if your intent is D or Bert. Seider and Raymond untouchables, they’d listen to offers on anyone else likely.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 18, 2022 at 11:29 a.m.
Thread:
Time to Contend
It’s not tho. Go for it next year. Deeper free agency and draft to suck for.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 18, 2022 at 12:52 a.m.
Thread:
Hey Dallas and RW fans
Nothing. Not a good time to make this trade, continue to build with a deep 23 draft.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 17, 2022 at 6:49 p.m.
Thread:
Lebrun says Petry to Detroit has potential
No way you are getting DET’s 2023 1st even in a swap. 23 wayyyyyy deeper than 22. DET’s hopefully gonna be garb again and have a shot at top 3 pick.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 17, 2022 at 3:46 p.m.
Thread:
next year
If I’m DET I’d accept.
Also, do the Sabres need Chychrun? Their D depth seems stacked. Too much for Chychrun in my opinion too.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 17, 2022 at 3:06 p.m.
Thread:
Roll the Di
Naz 6M, Campbell 3.4M, Giroux 1M!? $ amount is off for these contracts.
DET is also not swapping a 2nd for a 1st to take on Mraz. Needs to be a mid pick or switch out the 1st with other picks and prospects if you think it’s too much.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 17, 2022 at 2:22 p.m.
Thread:
EZPZ
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>zadinaveleno</b></div><div>Yeah, it's for a 4th round pick though, so in my opinion that would be worth the gamble. Chances are that 4th round pick never even sniffs a single NHL game, so I'd do it. Start the year with a Ned/Blackwood 1A 1B combo and see what happens.</div></div>
2 years of decline and he’s arguably going to a worse team. I’m taking a flyer on him personally, not in a position to trade assets even a 4th in my opinion.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 17, 2022 at 2:20 p.m.
Thread:
EZPZ
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wolverrobert</b></div><div>Detroit accepts. The Blackwood of last year wouldn't be great, but the Blackwood of the three years prior would be just fine until Cossa is ready, then decide between him and Ned.</div></div>
3.04 GAA, .902 save % year before. That’s a decline 2 years in a row.
First
2
3
4
Next
Page 3