RicXX

Blackhawks Faithful

Member Since

Jan. 9, 2018

Favourite Team

Chicago Blackhawks

Forum Posts

648

Posts per Day

0.3

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 7 at 8:01 p.m.

Thread: More on IR than on the ice time to call for help

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>Fu(k yes. Where do I sign to make this happen?</div></div>

That first lines average age is over 40... real OGL.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 7 at 8:00 p.m.

Thread: More on IR than on the ice time to call for help

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HockeyManiac95</b></div><div>Imagine Jagr bro lul. Kessel is probably the most realistic one of these</div></div>

Right, since Jagr has already pushed off his HHOF nomination time schedule... wouldn't that attract a huge draw!

Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 17, 2023 at 9:31 a.m.

Thread: Leafs get a 2nd to get Tanev deal done

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>I was actually just thinking of something similar recently. But I had TOR's 2026 1st instead of the 2024 1st, no 2nd going to TOR, 50% retention on Murphy, Donato going to TOR, and CHI taking back Reaves and Samsonov instead of Jarnkrok. So, TOR would be getting even more value than the 2024 2nd. Interesting... Maybe I was going overboard on giving TOR sweeteners, but CHI has a lot longer way to go than some CHI fans seem to think. So, adding more 1st round picks is pretty valuable to our rebuild, IMO. I never hit publish, though. I'd rather critique other peoples ACGM's than deal with critiques on my own. haha

Also, you're probably gonna have to pay more for Tanev. Given that he is a pending UFA rental and I personally think he is a bit overrated, I don't think he is gonna get as much as CGY fans want, but I definitely think he will get more than that. Especially with the retention.</div></div>

Come-on Garak we want to see what you put together! In a fictional Garak world what would he do?

Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 11, 2023 at 9:18 p.m.

Thread: Kubalik out

I believe the Hawks would say yes to this trade.

Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 11, 2023 at 9:16 p.m.

Thread: next year look

I believe that the pick would be going the other way. Hawks are pretty high on Dach, so if you want him you got to pay ;)

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 30, 2023 at 8:55 a.m.

Thread: cb12

That Hawks trade is absolutely 💯 a no.

It would be multiple 1st rd picks going to Chicago, not the other way around.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 28, 2023 at 8:57 p.m.

Thread: Hawks

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>Tell ya what, CHI will send you Cobbler the Bard for that package. He makes a great set of shoes and plays a mean fiddle.</div></div>

I can't like this one enough!

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 23, 2023 at 3:28 p.m.

Thread: So Depressed

Hawks may go for it, if they have trades set for Ceci and Broberg

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 23, 2023 at 3:20 p.m.

Thread: Let me know how i did as a leaf tan trying to fix u guys

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SociallyHawkward</b></div><div>Change the 5th to a 2nd and Chicago might consider it</div></div>

2 retention slots, that's at least a first... now for the players.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 23, 2023 at 3:17 p.m.

Thread: Blackhawks trade No 2

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SociallyHawkward</b></div><div>And they're not taking Reaves without Toronto adding a 2nd.</div></div>

More than a second.

A first and second to take Reeves and Klingberg, now add for Murphy and hawks will throw in Katchouk.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 23, 2023 at 1:37 p.m.

Thread: Nope no way but the price NOT SERIOUS

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rob32sjsharks</b></div><div>Sharks would NEVER do this
You trade the 4th OA Smith, the likely 1st OA in 24, plus 2 more 1sts and 2 more 2nds for 1 player. That’s selling the car to pay for gas!!!

I get none of those picks or Smith ever reach Bedard status…. But Smith & Celebrini alone are more valuable to the Sharks than Bedard, and of those other 4 picks I assume at least 2 if not 3 should end up being impactful pieces.

If this team had a Stacked prospect pool and team but needed a superstar I would consider, but the sharks are horrible with 1 quality youngster in the NHL and a couple with some potential and 2 aging stars and one very aged and bad former star (Vlasic) they need lots of high caliber pieces to build with.</div></div>

Good thing it's just a fun hypothetcal post for what would Chicago fans do if SJS offered them this package for Bedard.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 23, 2023 at 1:34 p.m.

Thread: Nope no way but the price NOT SERIOUS

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dr_Invictus</b></div><div>Lol...at 7MM of dead cap space I think you would need to pay for that family reunion

You'd need to add Eklund as well. Remove Vlasic, then maybe.</div></div>

Bedard is the main piece, I wasn't caring about the cap coming back, it's a hypothetical value for Bedard.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 23, 2023 at 12:18 a.m.

Thread: Nope no way but the price NOT SERIOUS

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dr_Invictus</b></div><div>Why is Vlasic in this trade?</div></div>

Just to put him with his Cousin. I like bringing family together!

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 22, 2023 at 11:59 p.m.

Thread: Nope no way but the price NOT SERIOUS

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NickC1988</b></div><div>You say no because Connor Bedard is already exceeding expectations with a horrible supporting squad. Additionally, the hawks have $50M in cap space next offseason, multiple draft picks in the first 3 rounds (over the next 3 years), and a pretty deep prospect pool. There's no need to make this trade from Chicago's point of view.

Lindros wanted out, the team had no choice.</div></div>

But look at what the trade did for Quebec/Colorado. Lindros didn't want to play for the owner of the Nordiques, had the sale already been in the works would he have stayed?

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 22, 2023 at 11:57 p.m.

Thread: Nope no way but the price NOT SERIOUS

With the 24 draft, are 2 of the top 4 players equal to Bedard? That is my only thought. The rest is well, magic beans. Bedard is good for business and will be exciting for years to come but could this lead to making a muti championship winning team for years to come?

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 22, 2023 at 7:02 p.m.

Thread: who knows

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CP11</b></div><div>Prospect?</div></div>

And where is the 3rd round pick for the retention?

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 5, 2023 at 10:30 a.m.

Thread: Leafs

Delete

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 4, 2023 at 10:23 p.m.

Thread: Block Rocker

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>exo2769</b></div><div>Klinger is awful. Hawks have the cap space...I'd probably do it and waive him to Rockford.</div></div>

I think Toronto still needs to add a pick to take Klingberg to be honest. Yes 2 young players and one going back but quantity does not equal quality in this league.

Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 31, 2023 at 1:52 p.m.

Thread: Contender Shift

I honestly don't believe that is enough to take Gallagher, I like the player, but not even a single top 10 pick is enough. Maybe add a 2025 2nd and 2024 3rd? That's a lot of cap being dumped for just a first.

Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 31, 2023 at 1:46 p.m.

Thread: next game

Swap T. Johnson and Foligno, puts the shooting side towards the respective center.

Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 31, 2023 at 1:36 p.m.

Thread: Weegs

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>YeahRighttt</b></div><div>They do need help in their top 6 but I fail to see how Beauvillier could supply it. He has never scored 40 pts. & hasn’t scored 20 goals since 2017-18. He would be another bottom 6 player for our collection. I’d rather look to free agency or give the ice time to a prospect to develop. A 6th rounder is very little but why throw it away?</div></div>

Because he is better than a 6th rd prospect...
And actually has higher value with retention to another team I'm sure (*cough* Tampa or Vagas *cough*)

Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 26, 2023 at 9:42 a.m.

Thread: Its time

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Snowhawk18</b></div><div>I think the Hawks decline, that pick is destined to be late in the 3rd round which just isn’t enough incentive to take on Mantha’s contract even with the retention.</div></div>

They have the space why not? It's almost a free pick... I would counter with, make it a higher pick (2nd) and no retention

Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 26, 2023 at 9:38 a.m.

Thread: What this team could look like

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>IconicHawk</b></div><div>I agree, the Reichel at center experiment has been a complete disaster, it’s time to move him back to the wing

And honestly I knew that experiment wasn’t going to work, he didn’t play center when he was called up last year so I thought it was quite a bad decision</div></div>

But you have to try, and experiment. You don't learn without trying and failing! The team is not trying to win this year, they are working to develop and evaluate what they have and how they adapt and mesh. I'm sure that there will be some moves people will call outrageous, but they will make the team better in the long run!

Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 24, 2023 at 10:22 a.m.

Thread: Getting desperate

Add a 2nd going back to Chi for the retention slot, and it might be palpable.

But I still don't see Chi doing this.

Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 24, 2023 at 10:16 a.m.

Thread: Leafs somehow Add Cooley Hall Thompson Petterson Hughes Aho Robertson and Kyrou

This is awesome and totally underrated!

Well done!

First23 Next

Page 2

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

RicXX

Blackhawks Faithful

Member Since

Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day