SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

RinksideOps

Member Since
Apr. 20, 2018
Forum Posts
82
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 24, 2019 at 1:50 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TheJoeMan</b></div><div>You're right, I disagree. I'm fine-ish with our forwards. I'd like to remove Ritchie and make room for Comtois and I think Sprong beats out Sherwood otherwise he needs to go. But we can't go with that as our D-core. Unless Larsson takes a huge jump, Guhle is actually good and Holzer suddenly transforms into an everyday, NHL d-man. We have a surplus of talented young forwards and there are teams with too many d-men. We need at least one top-4 RHD otherwise we're going to relying on Gibby big time again and I'd rather we didn't.</div></div>

I think moving Ritchie makes sense. Assuming he'd form part of a package for a quality top 4 RD like a Risto, Hamilton, Faulk, etc. I'd be game. However, I fear he'd only return a player like Colin Miller. Although better than our current situation, Miller doesn't stand out as a top 4 talent. More like a bottom pairing PP specialist.

In terms of Sprong, I think I hold onto him until we have a better idea of Kase's health. If Kase continues to get injured on a consistent basis, I would look to move him over Sprong. Kase brings more to the table than Sprong, but that's irrelevant if he can't stay healthy.

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RinksideOps</b></div><div>No need to worry about the expansion draft. Getzlaf's contract ends, so they can just expose him and resign him after, and Kesler's contract changes to a modified NMC that year so he can also be exposed.</div></div>

Good shout. Didn't think about that. Thanks!
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 17, 2019 at 11:51 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 17, 2019 at 11:31 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 17, 2019 at 10:06 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 16, 2019 at 7:08 p.m.
Thread: DUCKS
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 16, 2019 at 4:54 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RinksideOps</b></div><div>Thank you for being smart enough to call up prospects (I haven't seen a lot of that on here), but I don't think you actually have to make all these moves. Send all but one young winger down because it's better for their development to play top line minutes in the AHL than to be scratched/on the 4th line in the NHL (Paquette did a good enough job to resign for that role), and it will save you about $2M in scratches. Benn is getting old, so I'd rather sign Rutta (who might even be cheaper).
If you do all that, you would have enough money to only have to move one $5-6M player. Although Callahan is the anchor contract, he only has one more year and they could get a pick instead of giving one away if they move someone like Gourde. He had a terrible back half of the year and Miller is a year younger and more versatile. I think one of the prospects will be ready to replace Gourde in the next few years anyway, so might as well get him out now while there is still value.
Let me know what you think!</div></div>

Thanks man I appreciate it. My thought process with Barre-Boulet, Verhaeghe &amp; Raddysh was basically give them each a tryout and see which of the 2/3 fit best. After 12-15 games, send the odd man out to the AHL to play top line minutes and not stunt his development. That's actually a good call on Rutta. If you can get him for a similar price or like you said, cheaper, I 100% agree! In regards to Miller or Gourde, it was genuinely a 50/50 toss up as to who to trade haha, if they can get better value for Gourde I think that is the smarter move to make then. If they clear enough room to keep Callahan on the payroll that would obviously be best as well, since he only has a year left. Either way I think Tampa has a lot of good options!
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 12, 2019 at 4:58 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 12, 2019 at 5:26 p.m.