Avatar

RoyalBlueSabres

Member Since
Jun. 17, 2019
Favourite Team
Buffalo Sabres
Forum Posts
1563
Posts per Day
1.4
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 3 at 5:46 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 1 at 3:01 a.m.
Thread: Pesce and UFAs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lenny7</b></div><div>It's quantity over quality. The only reason contending teams trade away any of their top tier of players is because of cap issues. Pesce, at his current contract, has incredible value. Carolina would be digging a massive hole, and wouldn't be getting any dirt to throw in the hole. You're likely looking at 2-3 years at <strong>minimum</strong> for either of those picks to even sniff the NHL, at which point Carolina's window could potentially be a heck of a lot shorter than it currently is.

If I'm Carolina, I'm adding to my team, not subtracting.</div></div>

I think throughout all the comments that was certainly clear.

I also think that this proposal isn't as ridiculous as people are making it out to be.
I certainly understand why carolina wouldn't do it, but, it isn't outside the realm of possibility
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 1 at 2:58 a.m.
Thread: Pesce and UFAs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>evelutions2</b></div><div>Pesce should, and would be on the top pairing if it was anyone else other than Rod coaching the team. The only reason Rod plays him on the second pairing is because he doesn’t want all his eggs in one basket. Pesce is a legitimate top pairing defenseman, so 2 late firsts and a roster player who holds no value to the Canes would be a terrible move for the Canes. So the pile of junk you offered would be immediately shot down.</div></div>

Again bro I can't take anything you say seriously when you talk about 3 Firsts as a pile of junk.
As discussed through out the post I can u derstand the value of a certain player being worth more to a team than anything that can get traded.
But seriously you can't sound more annoying by keep saying this is a pile of junk.

Please tell me how many defenseman have netted a trade of 2 Firsts. And then tell me how they compare to Pesce.
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 31 at 2:54 p.m.
Thread: Pesce and UFAs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>evelutions2</b></div><div>Someone to fill the hole that Pesce would leave, a top 6 pure goal scoring winger, a top prospect, and high draft capital. Anything less gets immediately shot down.

That might seem like an overpayment to some, but at the contract he is on, and for what he provides on and off the ice, the teams that would want to acquire Pesce would essentially be asking the Canes not to make a run at the Cup that year. And that would require a big overpay, not just to pry him out, but to make the Canes not take a shot at the cup.</div></div>

Why would someone trade someone who can fill Pesce's role, plus a top 6 scoring winger, and high draft capital.

Let's take a look in the mirror bud. That is preposterous.
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 31 at 2:49 p.m.
Thread: Pesce and UFAs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>evelutions2</b></div><div>That junk pile won’t get Pesce. 16OA, 28OA, and Mittelstadt is of no help to the Canes now, but also subtracts more than actually adds. Canes have no need for any more Centers. Canes are contenders, not retooling or rebuilding. Canes won’t consider the thought of trading Pesce until Heimosalmi is comfortable at the NHL.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Canes2028</b></div><div>No shot the Canes do this.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>vikhodush</b></div><div>Why would CAR do this? How do two late first rounders help them when they're in the prime of their contender window with nobody to replace somebody like Pesce?</div></div>

Guys this is your 2nd pairing defense and you're getting 3 1st rd picks lol.
I get that it leaves a hole in your D and is tough to replace and that's fine and understandable.
But per Pesce's value this is more than fair and far from a pile of junk lol
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 31 at 7:22 a.m.
×