SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Ryancnbb

Member Since
Oct. 27, 2019
Favourite Team
Toronto Maple Leafs
Forum Posts
3213
Posts per Day
2.0
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 16, 2022 at 5:46 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 16, 2022 at 5:43 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 20, 2022 at 4:39 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 23, 2021 at 10:41 p.m.
Thread: How far
cup
Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 31, 2021 at 1:46 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 24, 2021 at 3:51 p.m.
Thread: leafs line I wanna see
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LeafsFanForSomeReason</b></div><div>Yep. I'll just regurgitate what I said in an earlier post that had very similar forward lines.

"I think this is the best option right now. I don't want to pile on the guy, and nothing that has gone wrong this season is his fault, but Ritchie is just not a piece that fits this puzzle. He doesn't fit the mold of a complimentary player that you want in the top 6 on this team, his defensive prowess and ability to breakout and get the puck moving up the ice isn't strong enough for that 3rd line, and there just isn't room on this team for a $2.5m 4th liner.

I know they want that 3rd line to look like Kerfoot-Kampf-Kase, but right now the top priority needs to be getting the top 6 clicking, and moving Kerfoot up is the best chance to do that at the moment. He's had chemistry with JT and Willy before, so even if you don't switch Nylander and Marner, there might be enough of a different feel to get it going.

At the end of the day, if you want this team to be able to play to it's potential, I think you have to move Ritchie."</div></div>

I agree 100%. it was a predictable mistake signing him.
Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 24, 2021 at 2:42 p.m.
Thread: couldve been
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>draft_em_sign_em_trade_em</b></div><div>100% agree on Brooks, except it should have been Engvall waived, no team would want him because he is 1/2 million $ overpaid.

As for protecting 4 Dmen; Dubas so badly over rated Holl (and Dermott) but truth in fact, the Kraken would have passed on them, the amount of good Dmen that were exposed League wide, would have made the Kraken view them as a 7th-8th Dman.

N. Ritchie is another case of Dubas having tunnel vision (and being influenced by the stupid fans and media) just like when Dubas overpaid in the trade for N. Folingno (should have targeted J. Carter, playoff warrior and 1 extra season and far cheaper trade value; Carter looks great as a Pen). At least the tunnel vision to sign Bunting has been okay.</div></div>

could've waived both Amadio and Engvall and they wouldnt have been taken. if we would've protected 7 forwards then the kraken would either have taken Dermott or Holl cuz who else?