SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Skyraider112

Sabres are elite
Member Since
Jun. 9, 2017
Favourite Team
Buffalo Sabres
2nd Favourite Team
Buffalo Sabres
Forum Posts
7991
Posts per Day
3.2
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 12 at 3:07 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 12 at 2:49 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CD282</b></div><div>How much for Alex Tuch?</div></div>

Not available but his value is equivalent to 3 1sts I'd guess

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Fail4Nail</b></div><div>I think Andersson is good, but I think you can get a better RH dman if you're offering that much.</div></div>

Like whom? Andersson is a beast he's exactly what we could use in the top 4

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Stadel</b></div><div>The value here is probably close on all of it but like none of those guys are getting moved for a combo of NTC and team timeline (Andersson is probably Calgary’s next captain)

The Sabres need to stockpile some picks and start adding some high upside d-men, like buium or parekh. The trade route isn’t viable for them and free agency seldom bears fruit</div></div>

Plenty of targets that meet our needs that don't have NTC. Agree we need to draft high level D men but that doesn't help the team for many years and we need to be improving the NHL roster right now.

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KrakBirds23</b></div><div>There's not really much incentive for Seattle to trade players with term for players in contract years. The pieces could have more potential but overall trade looks really lopsided in Buffalo's favor.</div></div>

Gourde, Tanev, and Borgen are both UFAs after 2024-2025 they don't have term. All three players I traded to them are younger, team controlled (RFAs), and have higher ceilings. No way Seattle would decline that lol
Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 24, 2023 at 5:19 p.m.
Thread: Next Year