ARCHIVE ▾

CBA ▾

CALCULATORS ▾

FANTASY-TOOLS ▾

TOOLS ▾

PLAYERS ▾

INTERACTIVE ▾

SociallyHawkward

Member Since

Apr 25, 2019

Favourite Team

Chicago Blackhawks

2nd Favourite Team

New York Rangers

Location

Chicago

Forum Posts

1082

Posts per Day

2.08

Forum Threads

9

ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS

Forum: Armchair-GM9 hours ago

Thread: Toronto Maple Leafs

Forum: Armchair-GM13 hours ago

Thread: Markstrom Virtanen Pesce

Rather have 4 years of pesce at 4 mil than 2 years of Gaudreau at almost 7 mil. Think calgary adds a pick instead of carolina

Forum: Armchair-GM13 hours ago

Thread: Ifbarkovgoes

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Theozler</b></div><div>Point was trending there but not surefire, I don't see where you have these other guys so far ahead of 90 point soon to be selke finalist barkov.

McDavid, mackinnon, draisaitl, Crosby are my top four right now, I think barkov is in the convo for five</div></div>

Forgot about drai. I'd put him at the top of the Pettersson, aho, point tier.

Forum: Armchair-GM13 hours ago

Thread: Ifbarkovgoes

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>flamesfan</b></div><div>Anyone who knows anything about hockey had point as. A top 5 center before the playoffs and Mallon and Matthews are easily better than him also pettersson is way better. Barkov was amazing last year but this year he wasn’t even top 15.</div></div>

I disagree. Only thing anyone can say for sure is mcdavid mackinnon and Crosby and the top 3. After that it's just opinion. In my opinion I'd put barkov with Matthews and Eichel (in no order) then point aho and Pettersson (in no order) behind them. I don't see malkin as top 10.

Forum: Armchair-GM14 hours ago

Thread: Ifbarkovgoes

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Theozler</b></div><div>Barkov is nmc so where he agrees to go may not be the best fit for assets they need, ekblad is a decent contract but he has been a bit up and down so you may not get value equal to value of letting him grow on your roster.</div></div>

You'd get a good amount of picks and prospects back for each of them no matter who you're trading with

Forum: Armchair-GM14 hours ago

Thread: Ifbarkovgoes

If florida were to trade barkov it'd be the start of a full rebuild so it'd be pointless to get guys like monahan and Bennett.

Forum: Armchair-GM14 hours ago

Thread: florida says screw it lets start over

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bdawwwgy1</b></div><div>Thanks for the input btw. Any realistic Ekblad trades you can think of? I wonder how leafs fans would feel about Ekblad for Reilly Engvall Hallander or Abruzzesse and PITs first</div></div>

There'd be a lot of takers for ekblad. I'd go heavy on the picks and prospects since it would be a long rebuild. The problem with trading him for reilly is toronto fans see reilly as better or as good as ekblad. They wouldn't want to add much to that

Forum: Armchair-GM14 hours ago

Thread: Ifbarkovgoes

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>Thats quite a lot for 2 years of Barkov but an understandable ask. I think its a little high though</div></div>

I'd say the opposite. Barkov is a top 5 center in the game. He's gonna cost a lot.

Forum: Armchair-GM14 hours ago

Thread: 3c and a goalie means success

Vegas is trying to clear cap by trading fleury. They'd probably retain the 2 mil but wouldn't want any more than a draft pick back

Forum: Armchair-GM15 hours ago

Thread: florida says screw it lets start over

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bdawwwgy1</b></div><div>I think someone's gotta be capable of playing C though. I contemplated bringing strome back but eventually did because you still gotta have some maturity in the lineup, this forward core is super young</div></div>

Sign some unwanted free agents or trade for more cap dumps. Your centers could be wenneberg rask turris

Forum: Armchair-GM15 hours ago

Thread: florida says screw it lets start over

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Nikolay_Zherdev</b></div><div>If you added ada you’d prob take away nils and have to add someone else (prob an offensive prospect)</div></div>

Take out strome and a third. Add ADA

Forum: Armchair-GM15 hours ago

Thread: florida says screw it lets start over

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RClay321</b></div><div>That Blues trade is one of the worst I have ever saw, complete hot garbage</div></div>

That's exaggerated. Maybe take out sundqvist and blais but nothing more

Forum: Armchair-GM15 hours ago

Thread: florida says screw it lets start over

If you're going full rebuild don't bother taking strome. Take a cap dump and get more picks/prospects back.
Feel like you can get more for barkov as it is.

Could also get a good return for ekblad.

Lastly take seabrook and the hawks 1st rounder

Forum: Armchair-GM23 hours ago

Thread: Marner without Ekblad

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Capitalfail67</b></div><div>fukc Priskie POS i hope he never makes the NHL.... i wouldnt trade for him</div></div>

Show me on this doll where he hurt you

Forum: Armchair-GM23 hours ago

Thread: Marner without Ekblad

Huberdeau is better than marner and makes half the money

Forum: Armchair-GM23 hours ago

Thread: Trade with Arizona

This would be a very stan bowman move

Forum: Armchair-GM23 hours ago

Thread: Kuemper Series-7

Think this is the first overpay I've seen for kuemper. A first and a good prospect should get it done

Forum: Armchair-GMSat at 2:56 am

Thread: would be a great team

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dan10900</b></div><div>If buried (which would be more comparable to Orpik bc they would both be completely dead cap) he's only at 6.6 mil split over 3 years</div></div>

It's actually 9.75 mil over 3 years. And it should be buried

Forum: Armchair-GMFri at 7:39 pm

Thread: What would it cost to move JVR

A lot. It cost toronto a first to dump 6 mil and that was before a flat cap

Forum: Armchair-GMFri at 7:36 pm

Thread: A young future top line

Take cover! Incoming toronto fans

Forum: Armchair-GMFri at 7:36 pm

Thread: would be a great team

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mhockey91</b></div><div>Yeah but he was a career backup. I think Murray trade will surprise people. Just depends if they attach JJ or not</div></div>

We'll see. Their gm isn't off to a great start trade wise in my opinion

Forum: Armchair-GMFri at 7:30 pm

Thread: would be a great team

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mhockey91</b></div><div>Grubauer also didnt have the pedigree/ value that Murray has. honestly at this point, I don't even care. I just want JJ off this team. Matheson could be a good D similar to Schultz under the right circumstances, but pairing him with JJ would just be a train wreck</div></div>

Grubauer wasn't coming off a bad season like murray is.

Not to mention it's gonna cost more to dump cap in a flat cap offseason

Forum: Armchair-GMFri at 7:08 pm

Thread: 13 and 23 hockey trades

Interesting trades but I still think it'd be a mistake to trade monahan. If lindholm is good enough to be a #1 center they should have been playing lindholm and monahan as their 1/2 centers.

Forum: Armchair-GMFri at 7:03 pm

Thread: would be a great team

Orpiks contract that was traded with grubauer only had 1 year left at 5.5 mil. Johnson has 3 years left for a total of about 10 mil. Might have to make the pick a 3rd or 4th. It's a lot easier to take on a cap dump that only effects your team for 1 year.

Forum: Armchair-GMFri at 11:02 am

Thread: strome

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ryancnbb</b></div><div>i though chicago was retooling</div></div>

They've been retooling for about 5 years now. Bowman needs the team to start winning before his jobs on the line

Page 1

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyForum RulesAboutCBA FAQContact Us

Follow @CapFriendly

© 2020 CapFriendly.com