SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Ste_Catherine_Street

Member Since
Jun. 19, 2019
Favourite Team
Montreal Canadiens
2nd Favourite Team
Colorado Avalanche
Forum Posts
1659
Posts per Day
0.9
Forum: Armchair-GMSun. at 8:30 a.m.
Thread: Necas to MTL
Forum: Armchair-GMSun. at 8:16 a.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>Do you think that McDavid, MacKinnon, Kucherov and Panarin are good <strong>because</strong> they are flashy, or because they are <strong>not</strong> flashy?

Juraj Slafkovsky and Neighbours are at a similar point in the upward arc of their careers -- here are the three youngsters' first full seasons:
Neighbours: 77* games, 27 goals, 11 assists = 38 points, -16 (* 2 games remaining)
Slafkovsky: 79* games, 19 goals, 29 assists = 48 points, -19 (* 3 games remaining)
Zegras: 75 games, 23 goals, 38 assists = 61 points, -21

Slafkovsky turned 20 during his first full season and had 39 NHL games prior to it
Zegras turned 21 during his first full season and had 24 NHL games prior to it
Neighbors turned 22 during his first full season and had 52 NHL games prior to it

Now, I'm not about to predict, or even suggest, which one is going to have the greater, or longer, or more successful career. My point is the converse: that from what (little) we've seen so far, there is no fact-based reason to assert with any confidence that either Neighbours or Slafkovsky will ultimately turn out to be a more impactful player than Zegras.</div></div>

Short answer, obviously the league elites are flashy.
Long answer, you need a lot of nonflashy guys to win with. OReilly, Bergeron, Danault, etc. I'm not putting these guys in the same group, but when you can't find Elite players you need as many of these as you can find. Bergeron was Elite, but not flashy. More impactful? yes I like JN, yes I think he can be more 'impactful' than Zegras.
Forum: NHL SigningsSat. at 10:47 a.m.
Forum: NHL SigningsSat. at 5:25 a.m.