DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
TM11
Member Since
Jun. 27, 2017
Favourite Team
Washington Capitals
Forum Posts
672
Posts per Day
0.3
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 hours ago
Thread:
Let The Pain End
Umm....... I think that would be Chychrun and a first and maybe more the the Kings to entertain anything around Clarke
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 20 at 3:16 p.m.
Thread:
Sell Sell Sell
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Justafan79</b></div><div>No actually I'll. type. it. slow. maybe that'll. help you. He was. used. to move up. 54 spots</div></div>
so a first round pick?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 15 at 6:18 p.m.
Thread:
Sell Sell Sell
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Justafan79</b></div><div>It was Goodrow and a Third for a late 1st so saying he got a first is very disingenuous.</div></div>
so he got a first??? as a winger too. gosh I wonder what a guy whose under contact for another year and one of the best pk and faceoff percentages might get surely better than that. (ik youre a guy that sees a team you dont like get a late first and be like "its basically a second", then watch your team get an early 2nd and be like "its basically a first" lol
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 15 at 6:17 p.m.
Thread:
Worst Contracts Controversial Sorry
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rags21</b></div><div>Schneider does not play top 4 minutes lol
Jarvis was put in the top 6 from day one and QB wasn’t in the top 6 until this year they put him on top line</div></div>
QB played last year in L1, and they didn't put Jarivs into the top 6 he earned it lol.. the rangers will i guess continue to fail at developing anyone and you'll still say its because they are contending yet wont win anything again...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 13 at 12:16 p.m.
Thread:
Sell Sell Sell
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Justafan79</b></div><div>Coleman was 28 scored 21 goals before he was traded as well as having 21 the season before . Dowd is 33 has 23 more goals in his entire 9 year career as Coleman had the season he was traded and the one before. Coleman is a terrible comp. For Dowd</div></div>
Coleman had a career high of 36 points, Goodrow 24. If coleman got a 1st and a former first and goodrow got a first alone I would say pretty eaisly that dowd falls in between those two and that was a great comp for the range that dowd gets thats somewhere between lol
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 13 at 12:13 p.m.
Thread:
Worst Contracts Controversial Sorry
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rags21</b></div><div>And I’d bet if ranger got Hughes or Nemec or anyone else the devils drafted, they would be buried and not developed well lol
Same goes for Kakko being drafted by a bottom feeder and getting top line minutes from the get go</div></div>
I mean no Braden Schnieder found his way into top 4 minutes on the Rags, you just gotta be good lol, Byfield on the Kings playing L1, Jarvis on the canes playing L1 and those are both contending teams
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 9 at 6:47 p.m.
Thread:
Worst Contracts Controversial Sorry
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rags21</b></div><div>Nemec was a no brainer because of positional need and of course they were gonna take Hughes brother to make him happy
Lmao you devil fans hold on to that “NYR fans cheered so loud when Hughes/Kakko was drafted” meanwhile its so far wrong 😂</div></div>
Jircek Was ranked higher by alot of people and There was alot of talk about clarke. Yes they couldve all been top 5 picks but look at guys like Tucotte, Joleuvi, Kakko, Pulijarvi etc just because they were a "no brainer" doesnt mean their bound to work out, also Bratt in rd 6 was a pretty good pick
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 9 at 6:32 p.m.
Thread:
Worst Contracts Controversial Sorry
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>tryger</b></div><div>So your issue with Danault isn't his contract or his play, but that LA shouldn't have got him because in 2 years they would sign PLD?
Yeah Im not saying him or the contract is bad, this was like more of an organzational thing, Like how i put Dougie from NJ. Hes been worth every penny for far, but they have Hughes, Nemec and Casey coming up so soon will be paying an offensive D 9M to not even run a PP. I dont blame you kings fans for loving everything about that contract, this is just an outsider's perspective of wondering how the team would be with Kop-Byfield-Dubois as a C core and of spen the Danualt money elsewhere
Byfield has played one game at center, Turcotte is more likely to be given that opportunity. It's ok that you haven't watched that many Kings games, but you know he's a shutdown guy and on a points pace he's been much better in LA, so I don't understand why you think that someone who would likely get more in free agency now is on a bad contract. Because I can tell you Habs fans would sign him at $6M in a heartbeat.</div></div>
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 9 at 6:27 p.m.
Thread:
Worst Contracts Controversial Sorry
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rags21</b></div><div>I mean their picks are no brainers (hirshier, both Hughes, nemec) so how much credit are you really gonna give? The only thing I’d say their GM is good at is getting good value on their top players contract (except Meier because I don’t think he’s that good)</div></div>
Nemec wasnt a no brainer, Patrick was the project 1 over Hischer and Hughes wasnt a gaurenteed top 5 pick either
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 9 at 6:20 p.m.
Thread:
Worst Contracts Controversial Sorry
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>tryger</b></div><div>You do realize that when Kopitar retires Danault is the Kings best option at 1C. Byfield has played wing better than any position, he might move to center but he still would need time to adapt. Danault has gone to the cup finals against the hardest 1Cs in the league. His playoff prowess is one of his best qualities.</div></div>
Im just saying if their C depth went like Kopi-Byfield-Dubois RN and they spent that Danualt money on a top 6 winger are the Kings better or worse, especially if they let Byfield develop at C the last year. I am not an in depth Kings know it all so I wont say I am but from an outsiders perspective they werent really cup contenders when they singed him and I just think letting the young kids grow into their roles as centers might of been more benefical to the Kings 5 yeas down the line
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 9 at 6:19 p.m.
Thread:
Worst Contracts Controversial Sorry
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>Pipeline? They're trying to win now, and Turcotte ain't gonna come anywhere near spelling Danault.</div></div>
They signed Danualt a couple years ago when they had Byfield and Turcotte in the pipeline. Im just saying if their C depth went like Kopi-Byfield-Dubois RN and they spent that Danualt money on a top 6 winger are the Kings better or worse, especially if they let Byfield develop at C the last year
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 9 at 6:17 p.m.
Thread:
Worst Contracts Controversial Sorry
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MisstheWhalers</b></div><div>I think Danault's contract is fine and Duchois will rebound next season though his contract is still a bit high and didn't think the Kings needed him.</div></div>
Yeah I said it in the description is that I dont know if the current Kings makeup wins them the cup and would you look back in 2 years and say maybe those 2 early playoff exits weren't worth not having Byfield play his normal positon to develop and keep Turcotte down? The cap and the contract is not bad, its what signing him has done to their pipeline. And even if Dubios "rebounds" to his career high of 63 points thats still not an 8M Center
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 9 at 6:12 p.m.
Thread:
Worst Contracts Controversial Sorry
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jfstompers</b></div><div>Copps been a disappointment but comphers been good no complaints about the player.</div></div>
I dont watch the wings alot, just know they were kinda similar players and production and thought it was weird Stevy Y signed them back to back years
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 9 at 6:11 p.m.
Thread:
Worst Contracts Controversial Sorry
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GuyGuyGuy</b></div><div>I agree with most of this list except Danault and Chabot</div></div>
Yeah they are definitely! still good players, I gave my reasoning for them in the description
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 9 at 6:10 p.m.
Thread:
Worst Contracts Controversial Sorry
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>tryger</b></div><div>"Danualt is the best shutdown center in the NHL" yet is one of the worst contracts? He also has reached career high goal scoring and bolstered his average a ton more.</div></div>
The point im saying is I dont know if the current Kings makeup wins them the cup and would you look back in 2 years and say maybe those 2 early playoff exits weren't worth not having Byfield play his normal positon to develop and keep Turcotte down? The cap and the contract is not bad, its what signing him has done to their pipeline.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 9 at 6:09 p.m.
Thread:
Worst Contracts Controversial Sorry
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>Krug 100%. Parayko and Binnington have no business being here. At least not right now.</div></div>
Yeah I said that in he description I dont ever watch the blues I was more or less just boxscore picking haha
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 9 at 5:36 p.m.
Thread:
Worst Contracts Controversial Sorry
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NYR_Biggest_Fan</b></div><div>It's funny how Devils fans think their gm Tom Fitzgerald is the best(one of) in the league</div></div>
They have been excellent at drafting in recent years and I do think he is a decent GM but as a caps fan idk what he say in Vitek t o want to roll with them again going into this year and yeah the Dougie contract I think is awful. I can't even remember if he was the one that signed that but yeah its like im pretty sure Holtz in a bigger role could do what Palat or Timo are doing this year, I think the obsession of wanting a new shiny piece got to him. But the Hughes and Bratt Contracts are whats really gonna help them
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 9 at 4:48 p.m.
Thread:
What do these Players get us if we sell hard
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>I think what teams are looking at with Pacioretty is, "can we put him in the right situation where he can catch lightning in a bottle?" Followed by, "if we do that, can he stay healthy." Both really big question marks, so I think any team taking him on is taking a gamble. I actually really like the bruins as a fit here - relatively low cost (unless there's some bonkers bidding war, which isn't impossible), and I think he would fit in well with Zacha and Marchand. If it doesn't work, oh well. I think that sort of deal could work if the bruins take a swing at a big target like Hanifin, fall short, but still want to add to their roster.</div></div>
Yeah he deserves a cup and the Bruins are loaded (plus like when tampa choked Rd1 they came back and won it all) so I think he love to get that cup the only thing stopping him would be his Habs pride haha. But yeah I think like a 3 from Boston
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 9 at 4:46 p.m.
Thread:
What do these Players get us if we sell hard
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Canesfan21_</b></div><div>Pacioretty definitely isn’t returning a first considering he got traded for future considerations last time and has played like 15 games since then</div></div>
Yeah thats why I said this isn't what their values are just teams that could fit was more of a discussion. Secondly, he got traded for FC because Vegas was in cap Hell he was like a PPG that season. but Idk if his value will be higher because GMs will look at his past or it will be lower because of the injuries
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 9 at 4:44 p.m.
Thread:
What do these Players get us if we sell hard
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>i think pacioretty is likely in the 3rd to 4th round pick range.</div></div>
Yeah, he's weird because he actually looks better than his production and a huge locker room guy, but there's massive risk with taking him espcially because hes been good at setting up but cant put the puck in the net this year which used to be his best thing.
Forum:
Mock-Draft
Feb. 9 at 4:41 p.m.
Thread:
2017 1st round re-draft
Its funny at the time it was deemed a very weak draft class and in reailty we got two top 5 D along with many other elite players
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 9 at 4:38 p.m.
Thread:
Sell Sell Sell
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Canesfan21_</b></div><div>Give up the Dowd for a 1st thing already. It isn’t happening.</div></div>
Goodrow and Coleman got first, Dowd has another year left and is the best 4C in the league (Im a caps fan so im wishful thinking) but I dont see how it is out of the realm of possibilites to get the best 4C whos elite at Pk and Faceoffs for 2 years at 1.5 mil
Forum:
Mock-Draft
Feb. 9 at 4:36 p.m.
Thread:
2022 NHL DRAFT REDO
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kyle_Okposo_Lover</b></div><div>Geekie is having a good year as a DY+2, im not gonna write about about it. There are plenty of 2022 guys im taking before him, tbh probably 20+</div></div>
Agree, he still cannot skate. I was the number one Kakko hater during the draft process because he couldnt skate, looked like he was in quicksand and Geekie is even worse. Geekie wont be a center and def a JVR type winger
Forum:
Mock-Draft
Feb. 9 at 4:35 p.m.
Thread:
2022 redraft top 10 with analysis
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ht42</b></div><div>Big feeling that Hutson can be in this conversation.
And I see multiple games of Nemec, but he is a turnover machine........</div></div>
So you call Nemec a tunrover machine but want Hutson whose even more of a turnover machine there??? dont get me wrong Hutson is sick and gonna be amazing but I think hes gonna be like prime Tony D, Barrie,Klingberg etc. probs getting 60-70 points from him but no D. Nemec gives you better D and size
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 9 at 4:32 p.m.
Thread:
What do these Players get us if we sell hard
My Guess is Dowd with his extra year could fetch a first (Goodrow/Coleman-like), Mantha if retained probably a 2 but who knows GMS loves big players, Patches has a NMC so idk if hed want to chase a cup but hes another guy who could fetch a 2/3ish pick. NAK is definitely a player contending teams want as depth and see him as a 3/4 as well. Next Edmundson isn't good but again big tall dude so maybe a 3rd from a team. But lastly I think TVR/Jensen are out given the Bear signing and think either with the term could net a decent return of a 2/3 and prospect but nothing elite. Finally, I think you have to entertain a Lindgren trade especially if a Carolina/NJ/Tor call.
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com