DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Utah Hockey Club
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Utah Hockey Club
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
Trmaus12
Member Since
May 21, 2023
Favourite Team
Boston Bruins
2nd Favourite Team
Colorado Avalanche
Forum Posts
148
Posts per Day
0.4
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 22 at 7:04 a.m.
Thread:
Schmaltzy
Sweeney hangs up the phone immediately on that one
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 22 at 7:03 a.m.
Thread:
Improving the top 6
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Celtics21</b></div><div>Seversen was signed to an 8 year contract and was 2 years younger. I’m not sure a 8th year for a 30 year old player has a lot of value to the signing team. Maybe the two weeks is worth a marginal prospect like former fourth round pick Cole Spicer.</div></div>
Yea a 3rd for Lindholm's UFA rights is a bit too steep imo, I like the idea of a 6th/7th and a lower tier prospect so so we can get first dibs if Boston wants Lindholm that badly.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 22 at 6:51 a.m.
Thread:
Would this make sense for both teams
Not at all lol
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 21 at 6:57 p.m.
Thread:
peepeepoopoo1234
Necas is not a center nor does Carolina want Ullmark
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 21 at 6:55 p.m.
Thread:
Hmmm
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BruinsWoahWoah</b></div><div>Why move Geekie for that low of a return?!</div></div>
Exactly, Idk why everyone is trading Geekie in these posts. He's a great third liner than can be elevated when needed, plus he's and RFA next year.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 21 at 2:10 p.m.
Thread:
Its simple really
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Smitty426</b></div><div>Markstrom has a finite contract. Once done the idea is one of the young guys is ready.
<strong>NEXT YR FOR INSTANCE</strong>
Markstrom 2yrs left and Allen 1 yr left
<strong>FOLLOWING YR</strong>
Markstrom UFA and Daws/Schmid/Poulter/Brennan/Malek
<strong>THIRD YEAR</strong>
Two of Daws/Schmid/Poulter/Brennan/Malek
Its the only reason I see Fitz so interested in Markstrom to begin with. Not a bad plan, but he's gonna need some solid D in front of him.
<strong><em>Saves us from moving Holtz, Our 10 OA this year, '25 1st</em></strong></div></div>
Yea I personally like the idea of going with Markstrom if I’m NJ but I wonder what Calgary wants in return for him after a pretty good year
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 21 at 11:37 a.m.
Thread:
2024-2025
You're only 4mil and 5 years off for Sway lol
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 21 at 10:41 a.m.
Thread:
2024-2025
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Pdubs98</b></div><div>We seem to all want this LOL</div></div>
If any team offered a 1st for Ully I’d personally send him to that team. Hes a great goalie and deserves to be a true G1 and it’ll only help the Bs get more offense. Should be a win/win situation
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 21 at 10:27 a.m.
Thread:
2024-2025
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Celtics21</b></div><div>If Ullmark is willing to waive for an extension, I feel like he ends up in Ottawa.</div></div>
Man I’d take this deal in a heartbeat if he’d waive for the Sens
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 21 at 10:23 a.m.
Thread:
Its simple really
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Celtics21</b></div><div>The thing is NJ and Boston making a trade makes sense. I wouldn’t read too much into message board banter. The reality is none of us know what the teams are going to prioritize.
Even if Boston decides to wait and trade Ullmark at the trade deadline, it matters what you have in your roster before the playoffs. Things are rarely black and white.
There are plenty of deals with Jersey that make sense as long as both sides work together to get a deal done.</div></div>
Oh yea i definitely agree it makes more sense for us to facilitate a trade with NJ, it’s clear they want a goalie. They might not go for Ully, but we can accommodate a trade that allows us to bolster our offense, and them to bolster their goaltending
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 21 at 10:04 a.m.
Thread:
Its simple really
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Celtics21</b></div><div>What happens when Ullmark is traded to another team and you are left trying to bid for Markstrom with Calgary knowing there isn’t another goaltender on the market that is good enough to lock in premium goaltending for your team?
Talk all you want, the risk of loss between you not getting Ullmark dwarfs us losing Clarke/2025 second.
I’m not going to pretend there is not some desire to trade Ullmark. The difference is I don’t believe that it’s going to be nearly that difficult. You are acting as if he’s a cap dump or the goalie situation around the league isn’t what it is.
Husso is on a one year contract and they have the cap room to deal with it for a year or maybe they could trade him to NJ where he’d be an upgrade.</div></div>
I’ve seen some other trades involving Husso. Only way we could really make it work with shipping out Ully is getting Husso back at around 2mil for a backup position. Slight risk but if we’d get a good return on top of that, it could be potentially be better than what NJ wants to offer
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 21 at 9:57 a.m.
Thread:
Bring in some young guys
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>rednwhite</b></div><div>Where is Veleno? I think he was fine as a 4C, I wouldn't mind us bringing him back in a depth role. Also 3 million for Perron is too rich for me. I would offer him 2 at the most. I doubt Boston wants Husso back in any Ullmark trade, they would benefit from the cap savings of moving Ullmark. My guess is they would want a prospect a 2nd and 3rd for him. I would be curious if he would be willing to extend in Detroit knowing that Cossa and Augustine will be competing for starts in the next 2/3 years.</div></div>
Husso at 2mil isn’t terrible imo, but yea we’d need more to warrant that. But it would solve trying to find a competent backup in FA.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 21 at 9:52 a.m.
Thread:
How about this
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gofnut999</b></div><div>How about you give us your 1st this year for Ullnark and taking dump Husso.
Otherwise keep Husso your problem.
2nd/and one of Buium/Wallinder for Ullmark. It’s less than his actual value but B’s likely take it.</div></div>
I’d take this trade if they retained ~2mil on top of the prospects and lower picks in order to dump Husso. I feel like that would warrant the rest of the return for Ully too
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 21 at 9:33 a.m.
Thread:
Bruins next season after a draft day blockbuster
Imo Don't think Ullmark will waive his NTC for the Sens
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 21 at 9:25 a.m.
Thread:
Its simple really
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Celtics21</b></div><div>People need to stop pretending that either side has superior leverage. My guess is if NJ made that offer and decided to play hardball that Ullmark gets traded to Detroit for Shai Buium and a 2024 2nd round pick, which frankly is probably my favorite probable package from a team needing a goalie. I’d rather have that package than Alex Holtz and a 2024 third, but it’s close.
If the objective is to lose arguably the best option in goal because you are trying to squeeze Sweeney and pretend to be a tough negotiator, go ahead. You’ll likely lose. There is the perfect opportunity for a trade between these two teams if both GM’s are smart
The Devils need a goalie and the options on the open market aren’t in Ullmark’s class. Saros isn’t likely available and even if he is, you are talking about a different price point. I read the posts above and it’s as if Ullmark doesn’t have the best Goals Saved Above Expected / 60 over the past two years in the league or a Vezina. Boston has had two quality goaltenders. The description of platoon goaltender seems to fit Jake Allen and Kaapo Kapanen more than Linus Ullmark.
The Bruins need to trade him to secure another top 6 forward option in free agency or they are depending on Lysell and Heinen instead of resigning DeBrusk if they sign Lindholm. The irony is that probably is the more prudent approach from a cap mgmt perspective if they believe in Lysell’s talent (he did have a very good year in Providence)
There is NO cap crunch with pending teams that could trade for him. Most of the league has salary cap room, but some have less than others.</div></div>
I could definitely see Ullmark getting shipped off more more or less than a first. It really just depends on how negotiations go with the team in question.
Even if we don’t get the best return for Ully, we will at least be able to use that 5mil on an offensive player like Bert or Debrusk which is key. We can’t go for another playoff run with a goalie like Ully on the bench, he deserves to play a role on another team and we need offense.
I’d love to see Lysell have a good camp and make the team, could definitely pass on Heinen if we think either him or Merk will make the team.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 21 at 8:31 a.m.
Thread:
Its simple really
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NJTM</b></div><div>You can take Graeme Clarke’s RFA rights too in addition to the second round pick. Only the most irrational NJD fan would put up any fight here.</div></div>
If that’s a more fit return that sure that works.
The only other reason I listed NJ here if that they want a goalie, and it seems like Ully wants to be closer to the East coast. Nevertheless, whatever the return is that NJ wants to pay is fine if that ends up happening. If not no big deal. Saros and Markstrom could still be targeted for them but i bet that would cost way more to acquire one of those goalies
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 21 at 8:25 a.m.
Thread:
Its simple really
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hammerwise</b></div><div>True, but its a stretch to say Ullmark is a 1G for all the reasons I've put before, and if Sarros is available then Ullmark doesn;t stand a chance. Theres alot of solid backup/platoon UFA options out there and while Ullmark weould be the best of that lot, hes not the best quality starting goalie that is available in trade. Ullmark isn;t a starting goalie and has no history of being a number one goalie.
But the market for goalies is quite small and theres alot of options out there. Ullmark as a platoon number one and a 5mil expiring guy does not have the value of a Sarros or maybe even a Markstrom. Theres only a few contenders who would stump up for a starter (Toronto and NJD come to mind), but if Sarros, Markstrom are available through trade as well as some similar options to Ullmark available in UFA, no one is paying that much for one year of Ullmark.
And while I like the addition of Beertuzzi and Holtz, I think you pass on Heinen and use that money to upgrade the 5-7th dmen.
Just my opinion though</div></div>
I like what you have here, only thing I’d add is even Ully hasn’t played a G1 starter role, he’s still been one of the better goalies in GSAx which you can overlook from a data standpoint and he’s got a 5mil cap hit.
I know NJ wanted Markstrom, and I think he’d be a good fit. Only question is the age, same with Ully too, although Markstrom is a bit older and has a higher cap hit at 6mil.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 21 at 8:19 a.m.
Thread:
Its simple really
I edited the post for you guys. It doesn’t matter what the return is. The goal of the trade is to help a team in need of a goalie they want to run with.
Don’t care about the return. Needs to be a win/win for both sides so whatever that is it’s the goal
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 21 at 7:59 a.m.
Thread:
Its simple really
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hammerwise</b></div><div>Not sure you get a 1st and Holtz for Ullmark, a 5mil expiring UFA platoon goalie
I like Ullmark, but hes never been a number one goalie his entire career and has only played 40 games or more (49 being his high) 3 times in a 9 yr career. No one is giving up that amount for what hes been all his career - a platoon goalie.
Maybe a 3rd and Holtz is more realistic. Or a 1st and Kevin Bahl kind of thing
I like the moves, but Holtz should be given every chance to play higher up in lineup than 4th line, and I'd rather have a better 3rd pairing/7th than Peeke-Wotherspoon-Forbort</div></div>
I mean I’m mainly going off what others have listed. Doesn’t have to include a prospect, but the idea being holtz and a first is that NJ is desperate for a G1. I don’t think it’s unrealistic to see them try and be the highest bidder for the G1’s out there like Ullmark
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 20 at 8:44 p.m.
Thread:
24-25
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Whalers7997</b></div><div>You turned Zacha into a scoring machine. I think Holtz will out fine for you.</div></div>
I mean i'd take Holtz and a 2025 1st Round pick. I think that's more realistic if NJ believes Ullmark is their guy. Hotlz would just be an extra young fast guy that the Bruins do need imo.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 20 at 8:41 p.m.
Thread:
Delusion
I mean if Draisaitl doesn't want to resign in Edmonton it was rumored he'd come to boston, but even if he wanted to I don't think we'd be able to pay him what he wants
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 20 at 8:37 p.m.
Thread:
Realistic
I like this roster a lot, other than the trade for Lauzon, no need to dump one of our great forward signing of Geekie for a backend D we could sign for cheaper. Plus Geekie is an RFA next year so we should keep him as a solid 3rd line player that can be elevated when needed as he's proven this year
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 20 at 12:34 p.m.
Thread:
Bruins get some firepower
We need a better center, Guentzel isn't a good fit in Boston imo. Elias Lindholm is a better target with his dual eligibility
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 20 at 12:32 p.m.
Thread:
Delusion
Idk about that Draisaitl trade, but we do not need Reinhart at 9.5mil with his super high shooting percentage. I'd rather the Panthers overpay for him
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 20 at 12:29 p.m.
Thread:
24-25
Even as a Bs fan that's too much for Ullmark. Schmid isn't worth it for us, idk how Holtz would fit in our system, and NJ ain't gonna give up a top 10 pick for Ullmark imo
First
4
5
6
Next
Page 5
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com