DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
V1NnY2
V1NnY2
Member Since
Jul. 10, 2018
Favourite Team
Montreal Canadiens
Forum Posts
349
Posts per Day
0.2
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 10 at 2:07 p.m.
Thread:
Picking 8
Value’s close but RD isn’t a need for the Devils.. maybe a LD to upgrade on Bahl
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 6 at 6:36 p.m.
Thread:
Euro Itchy and Scratchy land open for business
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jonh514</b></div><div>I wanna hold Armia until next TDL. Something is different and I wanna see if he can find a second wind.</div></div>
Even if he has a good season next year, he won’t resign in MTL after next year.
I’d rather get rid of him and leave more ice time for Roy, RHP, etc
With Anderson as a RW on the 3rd line and Gallagher on the 4th..until we get rid of them both!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 6 at 3:04 p.m.
Thread:
Euro Itchy and Scratchy land open for business
That pretty much sums it up. Maybe add Armia for anything/anywhere
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 6 at 2:59 p.m.
Thread:
Ready To Rumble
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Stavros99</b></div><div>So be it, but that's probably the last chance you'll get at obtaining 1st rounder or anything of good value for him. That cap space sure must be valuable to a rebuilding team.</div></div>
Habs will have plenty of cap space next year and maybe the year after. I’d rather pay a high pick in 3 years to dump him than retain salary on him for 4 years for a late first
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 6 at 2:56 p.m.
Thread:
The Summer Shanny Went Crazy
Quantity over quality for Xhekaj - this doesn’t get it done
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 4 at 8:22 p.m.
Thread:
Blockbuster with BUF
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BUFF36</b></div><div>If I was to include Ostlund, I would need a pick back.</div></div>
In this case, I wouldn’t mind adding anything lower or equal than a 4th
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 4 at 8:16 p.m.
Thread:
Blockbuster with BUF
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Joblow</b></div><div>Don’t get me wrong, i like Mittlestadt but he isn’t a top tier forward. He would be a nice addition to Mtl roster that for sure but not at the cost of a futur top righthanded defenseman. Buffalo didn’t even received a prospect of that caliber in the Eichel trade.
A late first and Logan Mailloux or Justin Barron would be much more a return to expect. Historically if you look at similar profile player in a similar position then Mittlestadt this is the return. Fiala deal is probably a great start to what the return would look like.
At the time of the trade Faber was a good prospect but he wasn’t a high profile prospect with the 19th overall pick. I think that this is what to expect in a trade for Mittlestadt.
As for Reinbacher, 5th overall pick aren’t traded a year after being traded. Unless you are talking about the top tier players.</div></div>
Very valid points here.
It’s funny you mention the Eichel trade as I did look into it before making this trade. Although he didn’t pan out, Krebs was ranked as a top-20 prospect in the league at the time and Tuch was a young top-6 power forward (plus 2 picks).
Here, for a lesser player in Mitts, the cost is virtually a top-30 prospect (since we could say Savard gets Krebs 1 vs 1).
I’d love it if the price was Barron and WPG’s first, but I’d be surprised to see BUF say yes to that (if they do, be my guest, I’d do it in a heartbeat).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 4 at 8:03 p.m.
Thread:
Blockbuster with BUF
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BUFF36</b></div><div>I just don't like giving 2 Centers at once when I am not positive if Kulich or Savoie will be ready. How close do you need the prospect to be, and does he have to be a Center</div></div>
I think it would have to be 2Cs (prime position for prime position). How about Ostlund?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 4 at 7:42 p.m.
Thread:
Blockbuster with BUF
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Joblow</b></div><div>Reinbacher is untouchable unless they received a elite talent in return. That not the case here.</div></div>
Mitts has virtually the same numbers as Caufield this year and would have been second on the team in points last year by a mile. Is he a true elite/all-star caliber player? No. But is he a young quality top 6 player with decent size? Yes.
I’d be curious to see what you expect as a return in a legitimate offer for Reinbacher.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 4 at 7:35 p.m.
Thread:
Blockbuster with BUF
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Subbanator7667</b></div><div>Habs turned down better offers than this for Reinbacher, turned down Michkov, turned down 13th overall 22nd overall and Askarov AND turned down Cutter Gauthier for Reinbacher.
So this isn't particularly close to what they would be willing to accept</div></div>
The goal here is to find fair value in a trade. At the end of the day, you are right, GMs personal preferences can come into play, but who knows what really is in both GMs mind at any given time..
Players value fluctuate over time. I’m pretty sure NSH doesn’t make that offer today. As for Gauthier, it’s still and will always be a rumor…I think most experts would say Gauthier has a higher ceiling than Reinbacher.
The reason that triggered me to propose this trade is the recent rankings made by a few « experts ». Wheeler has Reinbacher at 25. Hockeywriters have him at 19. Stephane Leroux at 33. And so on..
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 4 at 7:25 p.m.
Thread:
Blockbuster with BUF
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MTLaveragefan</b></div><div>It's fair value... but I'm not sure the habs would pull the trigger on it so soon. IF you look at the pre-draft video, they see him as the prototypical top pairing RHD that help teams win a stanley cup.
Is he really (probably not)? it's too early to tell. but to pass on Michkov, they must have had a good reason.</div></div>
I agree they were pretty high on him (and are probably still) but players value evolve over time and so far Reinbacher’s stock isn’t trending up.
To me, this only becomes a possibility if the Habs are high on Levshunov and/or Parekh, end up drafting one of them, and they believe their ceiling is higher than Reinbacher.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 4 at 7:20 p.m.
Thread:
Blockbuster with BUF
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jpsnow13</b></div><div>You know you did something wrong when Buffalo fans accept your offer....
8 years of Reinbacher are worth way more than 4 years of Krebs. Not even close.</div></div>
In this trade, Mitts is the key piece coming over from BUF and not Krebs.. but yes, Reinbacher could end up being more valuable than Mitts. Just as Nazar could become more valuable than Dach…
If this were to happen, I’m thinking BUF might need to add a future piece, but judging from the comments, it seems pretty spot on in terms of fair value
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 4 at 7:13 p.m.
Thread:
Blockbuster with BUF
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BUFF36</b></div><div>Very interesting, I don't know if it I would trade both those guys in that Deal. I would be willing to add different pieces without Krebs.</div></div>
I’d be curious to see what you want to offer but if it turns into a quantity of pieces instead of quality, the answer would be a definite no
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 4 at 2:29 p.m.
Thread:
Blockbuster with BUF
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AntiAnalytics</b></div><div>Ok, now THIS IS FINALLY a trade package that could actually be of interest to Buffalo
We’d likely have to send u Clifton as well though,
bc we’d have too many defensemen
But Reinbacher COULD “move the needle” to get us to think about moving Mitts
And Savard might be of interest if he comes along with an “heir apparent” like that
Idk that it would happen
But this is at least reasonable from the Sabres perspective
I’m curious to see what other Habs fans think though….
is Reinbacher untouchable?</div></div>
Pretty sure fellow Habs fans won’t like this (it’s got Drouin vs Sergachev vibes) but the way I see it is the Habs will be in a position to draft either Levshunov or Parekh.
So, with Barron, Mailloux, Konyushkov (plus Boqvist in the Laine trade), Reinbacher can become expendable for the right player(s).
Probably makes more sense on the BUF side than MTL, but thought it was fun to entertain the idea !
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 4 at 2:25 p.m.
Thread:
Blockbuster with BUF
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shibbal18</b></div><div>Ive seen a lot worse, Reinbacher doesn't help Buffalo now, but that's what they'd be looking for in return</div></div>
He COULD be in the lineup next year and help right now, but if not, you get a serviceable RHD in Savard to wait an extra year.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 4 at 2:19 p.m.
Thread:
Hey Craig
No rush to trade Anderson with retention considering all the cap space the Habs have right now.
Maybe next year, but not worth it now..
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 2 at 9:04 p.m.
Thread:
More Clarity
Habs will want more for Savard with retention. That’s maybe the lowest value they would accept for Savard without retention.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 2 at 4:24 p.m.
Thread:
Blackhawks if they claim Kuzy
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Snowhawk18</b></div><div>Can the Hawks claim Kuznetsov, retain 50% and trade him right away to a team like Vegas?</div></div>
Don’t you think WSH has tried to do this before putting him on waivers ?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 2 at 9:04 a.m.
Thread:
Its already over summer moves
As a Habs fan, I’m telling you to be prepared to be roasted for that ANA trade 😬😬
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 27 at 11:00 a.m.
Thread:
Perron on the move
Habs absolutely take that offer (and you can actually keep Ghost instead of sending him to us with retention).
I’d do Berggren for Savard 1 for 1.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 26 at 10:09 p.m.
Thread:
KJ a HABS player
I think you are undervaluing KJ quite a bit…
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 25 at 7:34 a.m.
Thread:
trust
Habs don’t even come close to considering this..
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 25 at 7:33 a.m.
Thread:
Deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jonas_Seagull</b></div><div>The only trade that goes through is Carrier</div></div>
What’s wrong with the STL trade? I think both teams say yes on this one too.
Only the CGY one I don’t see happening
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 25 at 7:30 a.m.
Thread:
Deadline
I was gonna say that OTT isn’t trading Pinto, but for that return, they have to say yes
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 24 at 7:49 p.m.
Thread:
Trade deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bobrick</b></div><div>So... you want the Sens to basically trade Hamonic for Ceci (who makes 2 million plus more) and who isn't wanted back in Ottawa. And Janmark who doesn't help Ottawa in any way. A late 2nd round pick and Bourgault who also isn't needed. And you want Vlad at 50% retained? Ottawa can do better by just getting a 1st from another team.
Also there is no way SJ touches that deal. You're not unloading Campbell that easily.</div></div>
Look at the return Tarasenko got last year. It’s similar whether you like it or not. Plus, any trade with EDM has to be money in money out. Janmark is obviously a throw in to make the money work.
As for Campbell, sure, EDM may have to add but SJ getting a third first is enough for them to consider getting into talks considering they are light years away from contention
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com