Warpbox

Member Since

Jul. 18, 2022

Favourite Team

Vancouver Canucks

Forum Posts

3101

Posts per Day

4.8

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 12:48 p.m.

Thread: If Clayton Keller doesnt want to go to Utah what would a trade look like

Canucks would be interested for sure probably be willing to Move a 1st, Lekkerimäki and Mickeyehev for him. If the price was more than that I'd think Vancouver would be out

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 12:35 p.m.

Thread: If Clayton Keller doesnt want to go to Utah what would a trade look like

Not sure if the Canucks would go after him or not, but if they did I assume a package starts with Lekkerimaki + a 1st + Mikheyev (for cap reasons)

Forum: Armchair-GMTue. at 5:27 p.m.

Thread: fix this mess

Garland has been so good for the Canucks this year. Whenever a line has been struggling Tocchet has put Garland on that line to get them going. The production has been slightly better for Garland over the past few years and Garland is younger. Cap hit is 1 million more for same amount of years. I think the Canucks stick with a guy they know works in their locker room and pass on the deal.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 12:33 p.m.

Thread: I have no idea what Im doing lol

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>notaplanet_1556</b></div><div>Im sorry what? Did you just call Willander a Small dman who cant defend well LMAO, he's 6'1 that's not small. The best aspect of his game is his defensive game lol.</div></div>

I assume he’s calling Cole Hutson a small dman who can’t defend well as in the description the OP has the Blues taking him round 1

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 1:38 a.m.

Thread: Insane

Yes please

Forum: Armchair-GMSun. at 10:14 p.m.

Thread: Insane

LA matches that with ease, it's gonna have to be 12.5 mil + for LA to not match

Solid Hronek trade

Not bad in value with the Keller deal but Utah can probably get more value elsewhere especially since they want to be competitive

Dillon gets less - Joshua gets more

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 8 at 9:34 p.m.

Thread: Brady

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TheBoyDuddus</b></div><div>Not a single top tier asset going the other way for Brady… come on now.</div></div>

Come on now.... :)

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 8 at 9:21 p.m.

Thread: Brady

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TheBoyDuddus</b></div><div>Not a single top tier asset going the other way for Brady… come on now.</div></div>

A top pair RHD isn’t a top tier asset?

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 8 at 9:21 p.m.

Thread: Brady

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TheBoyDuddus</b></div><div>Not a single top tier asset going the other way for Brady… come on now.</div></div>

I mean Hronek is a top pairing RD. Still not enough value but he is a very high tier asset

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 5 at 12:02 a.m.

Thread: What would you pay- Hronek

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Tjm220</b></div><div>It doesn’t make sense for Buffalo to pursue another expensive defender. They already have more puck movers than they can use.</div></div>

Plus, we need a “shut down” type & not another offensive defenseman
Sabres would have zero interest imo as well

Good player though
Someone will want him

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 5 at 2:13 a.m.

Thread: What would you pay- Hronek

I don't see NSH being in the running for him. Hronek wouldn't get utilized enough to justify whatever he wants on his next contract, plus what trading for him would cost in assets, when the Preds already have Josi.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 5 at 3:40 a.m.

Thread: What would you pay- Hronek

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Warpbox</b></div><div>I figured that because they have a ton of D but I was curious if they wanted a RHD.</div></div>

They wouldnt have traded for Byram if it concerned them

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 4 at 11:58 p.m.

Thread: What would you pay- Hronek

It doesn’t make sense for Buffalo to pursue another expensive defender. They already have more puck movers than they can use.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 4 at 11:48 p.m.

Thread: What would you pay- Hronek

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Warpbox</b></div><div>Would Liljegren + this years first work? Van could throw a third back if that would be wanted. My one issue with Toronto is how would they make it work cap wise</div></div>

I would easily do Lily and a 1st.

I would say Lily + 1st + one other smaller piece (prospect not named Minen, Cowan or Niemela).

The cap works for sure. They just couldn't resign Bert.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 2 at 1:47 p.m.

Thread: Habs a year from now

A 1st AND Prospects for Savard? Are you ******* kidding me? Lay off the dope bud.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 2 at 10:27 a.m.

Thread: Habs a year from now

Canucks pass easily. Raty and the 1st are the two best assets in that trade, wouldn’t give up either for Savard let alone both

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 2 at 7:44 a.m.

Thread: Habs a year from now

McLeod and RNH handle what Dvo would , so i dont get it from EDM POV
Anderson deal i dont see being a fit for SJS nor do i see him going to as he has a 8 team no trade list and they're at the start of their rebuilding
VAN has their Defense pretty locked up right now with Wallander and Petterson team Sweden top pair internationally in the WJC joining them sooner than later

Dvo back to ARZ makes some sense
It gives ARZ a way to profit off Dvo again
They could use a bulk faceoffs guy and MTL could use it to acquire McBain who fits our needs as a Physical Forward with Size we can use on Wing beside Dach for Support.
Mcbain-Dach-Anderson will see Andersons Value rise im sure as it did beside Dach alone the past few years but with Mcbain as well this would give him a big Power Forward line.
Even if that doesnt work out there is Josh Roy who could succeed beside them just as well if not more.

Savard until after the playoffs wont have a clear home
Too many teams acquired pending UFA players to fill a void they arent certain yet how thats gone
Until then looking at a Savard at anything less then a steal wont happen

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 2 at 7:20 a.m.

Thread: Habs a year from now

lmfao no

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 2 at 6:22 a.m.

Thread: Habs a year from now

Canucks pass.IMHO.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 2 at 2:50 p.m.

Thread: Hronek and Roy

Vancouver wouldn't move Hronek if he's willing to sign for that much

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 1 at 2:14 p.m.

Thread: Trades Ive seen

Mikheyev and a 1st for chychrun might be the start of something interesting but the sens can’t retain on that imo

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 29 at 6:35 p.m.

Thread: Habs

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Campabee</b></div><div>It was all the same play, it literally happened to Guhle last night by Konecny. Players know hitting is part of the game and sometimes the get hurt as a result if he holds a grudge over that then he should hold back to Europe cause he is gonna get a lot more hits like that if he stays</div></div>

Konecny didn’t forcefully slam Guhle down after the hit like Matheson did to Pettersson though. Guhle fell to the ice as a result of the hit, Pettersson fell to the ice as a result of a body slam

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 29 at 6:22 p.m.

Thread: Habs

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Campabee</b></div><div>I didn't know they had history lol

Edit** is the link below all you are talking about?! It's a clean hit and Petterson landed awkwardly. If Petterson holds a grudge over that type of thing then he is playing in the wrong league

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xFIAov-9RUU</div></div>

The original hit is fine, but after the puck is gone he picks him up and body slams him to the ice. That’s dirty

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 29 at 6:02 p.m.

Thread: Habs

Even if the value is fair on the Matheson-Hronek swap (personally I’d want more but that’s a different discussion), Matheson won’t ever be a Canucks because of his history with Pettersson

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 29 at 4:47 p.m.

Thread: Habs

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Campabee</b></div><div>Not really Hronek for Matheson isn't far off and was even proposed earlier today or yesterday by someone and Canucks fans didn't mind it too much (I just couldn't remember the details lol) and no one (especially me) cares what Bruins fans think about anything lol</div></div>

There's no grounds to the Canuck deal. Getting older for a slight cap decrease for a LHD when our right side is weak would be an awful move. Matheson may have had a decent year, but its more than likely a one off, and certainly not worth getting older for. I dont think the difference in value is only a 2nd either, but its the fit that doesnt make sense more than the value.

12 Next

Page 1

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

Warpbox

Member Since

Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day