SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

YesThisIsFlo

Canucks Fan... Help
Member Since
May 2, 2017
Favourite Team
Vancouver Canucks
Forum Posts
526
Posts per Day
0.2
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 28 at 1:19 a.m.
Thread: Petey
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Christian17</b></div><div>Lacombe definitely moves the needle you just don’t know who he is, but other GMs definitely do, and he looks like he’ll be bonafide top 4 dman with offensive upside.

The trade was the Ducks pick top 5 protected and the rangers 1st. Along with the other pieces. It’s pretty much same value as the panthers Tkachuck trade just different age groups and expanded team control on the assets.</div></div>

Oh no, I know who he is.

He's a dman with solid defensive accumen, but almost zero offensive or puck moving ability. He's playing 2nd pair minutes on Anaheim because the team is awful, and he's getting absolutely buried in it. But he's also 23, and will improve and stabilize, but I see him as a future defensive 3rd pairing dman on a good team or top 4 on a bad one.

Anyways, that doesnt move the needle for EP40.

Anyways 2.0, the trade was the 2025 Anaheim 1st. I wrote that it needs to be the 2024 Anaheim 1st.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 27 at 8:22 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 18 at 1:04 a.m.
Thread: I might be cooking
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Epic_Ninja_Dude</b></div><div>Value wise the Canucks trade is probably somewhat close, just don't see the Canucks doing that. Joshua-Blueger-Garland has been an amazing line and I don't think they'll break it up. If they do end up having to move Garland due to cap constraints, I'm sure they'd rather just move him for a pick, then sign someone to replace him (something similar to the Suter contract last offseason). That's cheaper, less term, probably a younger player, and all around less risk than bringing in Gallagher.</div></div>

I gotta think that the Canucks would do this though, the value is really solid and they're already looking like they won't be able to keep the line together. This may even give them to room to keep Blueger/Joshua, plus add the assets
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 6 at 1:43 a.m.
Thread: Vancouver
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>habitantlecolon</b></div><div>I love how other fans bash Anderson but would be surprised how the guy offers a second effort and even tries to block or break play in the neutral zone. Defensively he's not a wreck either. Our team is ba at managing gap space and stick lines. Our system is also a mix of man-to-man which is a hell to play with so many ahler or rookies. Anderson deserves a better understanding</div></div>

Maybe he does, but Mikheyev is head and shoulder better than him defensively, and is one of the fastest skaters in the entire league, and contributes more offensively. Why would the Canucks be paying to exchange him for Anderson? Anderson has the edge in physicality and net-front offense, but that's it. Mikheyev is way better in every other facet.